Channel
@auction_g1ft
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
48subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002373186418 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @auction_g1ft |
| Description | NFT • Giveaway • News Всё самое интересное здесь : Новости, Розыгрыши, Информация про NFT и Крипту. 👑 Администрация - @d1rk_lady |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 16 January 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/auction_g1ft |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 48 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:40 | 48 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 16 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
13 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6298671811345254603 | 4 | 30.8% | |
| custom 5454400915920413262 | 3 | 23.1% | |
| custom 5460751484629048087 | 3 | 23.1% | |
| custom 6136464120779638846 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| custom 6296367896398399651 | 1 | 7.69% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2025 to 7 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2025 to 7 June 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Йоу! Внимание всем те, кто хочет в будущем начать зарабатывать (НЕ КРИПТА, НЕ ЧЕРНЫЙ ЗАРАБОТОК). Мы сейчас в поисках креативных людей, которые умеют придумывать, воплощать свои идеи в сценарий и сюжет. В ближайшее время мы хотим начать работу над проектом, который будет в игровой стилистике. Писать в лс @pandeenfa
Posted without readable text
Sticker, posted without a caption
Это была не шутка?
Рынок NFT подарков стал потихоньку падать, да и вообщем рынок крипты, автомобилей и пр. заморозился. Когда только пошли новости по аукциону подарков, все надеялись на улучшение рынка, но и при этом знали, что он не станет прежним. Лично моё мнение, аукцион был создан для большего заработка в сторону Telegram, т.к. на аукцион было потрачено ОЧЕНЬ много денег, а в плюс эти покупатели так и не вышли. Если рассматриват…
Вышел аукцион - делаем камбек? 🙈
custom 54544009159204132621
Расспространите пожалуйста
Поздравляю! Галочки РКН хуета! Уебище заскамил на туфельки
Если тебе интересны NFT подарки, саморазвитие, розыгрыши и всё самое крутое - то тебе @pandeefam Тут Я, обсуждаю различные темы, как саморазвитие, так и NFTишки. Заходи, рад видеть!
New OWNER channel Auction Telegram! 😁❤️
custom 54544009159204132621
🐺
🎁 Сейлор Мун официально получили разблокировку в передаче, и теперь начинается самый интересное состязание - Сейлор Мун vs Пепе. Кто будет ТОП 1? ✅ Сейлор Мун 😭 Пепе
custom 62986718113452546034custom 62963678963983996511
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @auction_g1ft. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Auction Telegram” (@auction_g1ft), 48 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/auction_g1ft.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.