Channel
@au1rio
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
19subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002168013958 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @au1rio |
| Description | challenges (just anything that comes to my mind actually) @ulttxt |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/au1rio |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 19 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 19 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 12 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
˚ ʚ୨ +×+ ୧ɞ ˚₊ @yeongyuu_beomjunn you’d be in yeongyu’s yes, professor fiction ! you would probably be a psycho friend to gyu and yj’s therapists paying them to manipulate yeongyu so that they eventually get back together and you could enjoy stalking and watching them kiss… YES
˚ ʚ୨ +×+ ୧ɞ ˚₊ @naarengee you’d be in yeonkai’s gorgeous mini ! you would probably be kai’s English teacher so when you find out he hit on s.one in English you just become so proud that after yeonkai start their relationship you post on them on your IG account to show your students a great result of your classes…
˚ ʚ୨ +×+ ୧ɞ ˚₊ @buxmy you’d be in yeongyu’s terrible driver mini ! you would probably be a nurse and also related to soobin, so when you find out that soobin actually rode over gyu, you can’t stop laughing which makes gyu mad a little bit, but don’t worry, kai comes defend his sexy nurse
˚ ʚ୨ +×+ ୧ɞ ˚₊ @harmonyau you’d be in beomkai’s circles mini ! you would probably be kai’s oomfs on twitter and hype him to confess to gyu, but he just wouldn’t. SO you lied to him when he asked about the circles option and told him it was still available…
˚ ʚ୨ +×+ ୧ɞ ˚₊ @liblueluv you’d be in yeongyu’s marshmallow mini ! you would probably be gyu’s sister who can play magic somehow, so you do a abracadabra and be able to talk to their dog, marshmallow, and tell it to do evil things to your brother (just like what he did in the bathroom)
˚ ʚ୨ +×+ ୧ɞ ˚₊ @zootosooda you’d be in soogyu’s sick bros mini ! you would probably be the company’s new doctor and on your first day you figure out about soogyu’s relationship so you ask them to give you a massage unless you’d tell the fans about them (all fans already knew they lovers and shit) sooo you’d definitely get fired on your first day…
˚ ʚ୨ +×+ ୧ɞ ˚₊ @Jjuniehome you’d be in yeongyu’s yes, professor fiction ! you would probably be the first of many of yj’s students who’d found out about his relationship with gyu and become his n1 hater cause you knew he was married and shit, so you start to make a gang and plan to murder your professor, but eventually you’d be under arrest cause you suck at committing crimes
˚ ʚ୨ +×+ ୧ɞ ˚₊ @txtaupan you’d be in yeongyu’s catfish mini ! you would probably be yj’s n1 fan and you always suspected why is he acting like that in his IG account and that maybe it’s not him? but other fans didn’t believe in you. so you definitely were the first one finding out about yeongyu’s relationship and yes, you gatekept it…
˚ ʚ୨ +×+ ୧ɞ ˚₊ @so4xio you’d be in soogyu’s nicknames mini ! you would probably be soobin’s penpal who helped him ranking his nicknames given by gyu correctly not to make him mad…
˚ ʚ୨ +×+ ୧ɞ ˚₊ @soogyuuiiu you’d be in soogyu’s half naked mini ! you would probably be soogyu’s next door neighbour and hear soobin shouting (the day that he was seen bottom naked by gyu), not only you weren’t bothered but also you were enjoying whatever that was going on cause you secretly shipped them together
˚ ʚ୨ +×+ ୧ɞ ˚₊ @solum_e you’d be in yeongyu’s discount mini ! you would probably be just a poor person wanting to buy yj’s book and you have been begging him to give you like 2% discount but he was too tough. and out of a sudden you see not only s.one else (gyu) has got the book over you, but also he got it for free…
˚ ʚ୨ +×+ ୧ɞ ˚₊ @tosharewords you’d be in taegyu’s bet on me mini ! you would probably be gyu and tae’s mutual trusted friend, be there for tae and help him write his letter to beom and teach him all these romantic things (obv he doesn’t learn) you may even design their marriage card…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @au1rio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 890,025 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@au1rio named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“dubaduau” (@au1rio), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/au1rio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.