Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for wire

Channel

wire

@atwire

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,007subscribers

-192 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003301800552
TypeChannel
Username@atwire
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/atwire

Growth

1,0071,1991,1037 August 2026 — 1,199 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,199 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,178 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,134 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,099 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,061 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,032 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,016 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,007 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 20 days, net -192. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 978–1,228 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 04:041,007-9
25 Aug 2026, 01:551,016-16
21 Aug 2026, 20:141,032-29
18 Aug 2026, 19:131,061-38
15 Aug 2026, 10:381,099-35
11 Aug 2026, 19:171,134-44
8 Aug 2026, 08:501,178-21
7 Aug 2026, 23:181,199no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:481,199first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
58s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

79 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😭3240.5%
2835.4%
👀1822.8%
🤯11.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 18 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Apr 2026, 21:42 UTC659 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ JUST IN: User @dead has legitimately confirmed he’s fallen off financially in a Telegram post, stating he’s “4 figures,” needs methods, and that “everything I have is fake.” No indication of trolling—appears to be a serious admission. 💌 @atwire | @dyingactor

😭75👀4

18 Apr 2026, 19:04 UTC654 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ JUST IN: Per ZachXBT, a crypto whale was drained out of $280M+ across Ethereum and Arbitrum. The stolen money was moved into a fresh wallet an hour ago, and is believed to be the result of a social engineering compromise 💌 @atwire | @dyingactor

18 Apr 2026, 12:08 UTC480 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ JUST IN: ZachXBT offers $25K bounty for investigation into Ravecoin Per ZachXBT, the project appears to be controlled by an insider group and is being labeled as the biggest pump and dump coin. Ravecoin price went up by ~100x, with price increasing ~1000% daily. 💌 @atwire | @dyingactor

3

17 Apr 2026, 21:39 UTC467 viewsread 7 August 2026

join @aethals I’m going to end the giveaway in a little bit

17 Apr 2026, 16:59 UTC458 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ JUST IN: Threat actors are sending fake Ledger hardware wallets to victims Threat actors are now mailing fake Ledger hardware wallets to selected victims, along with a download link to a fake 1:1 Ledger Live app designed to appear legitimate. 💌 @atwire | @dyingactor

1😭1

16 Apr 2026, 11:30 UTC456 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

⚠️ JUST IN: Vitaly Zdorovetskiy apologizes after falsely accusing man in sting video He admitted Akash Singhania was wrongly labeled a chi** predator and has since been cleared of wrongdoing. The video spread widely — reaching friends and family — leading to backlash and harassment before being deleted. Vitaly has removed the clip and urged people to stop sharing and targeting Singhania. 💌 @atwire | @dyingactor

👀2😭2

16 Apr 2026, 09:04 UTC393 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ JUST IN: 15-Year-Old Behind $20K Plush Pepe NFT Scam Teen allegedly used a fake middleman to trick a user into sending a rare Pink Galaxy Plush Pepe NFT worth $20K. Victim only realized after the transfer was completed. Same scammer reportedly linked to a January theft involving @slim, losing a Plush Pepe Pink Latex worth 50,000 TON ($79K). 💌 @atwire | @dyingactor

😭4

16 Apr 2026, 09:02 UTC360 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ JUST IN: Two victims kidnapped in France for a €400K crypto ransom demand The victims, linked to a wealthy crypto investor, were abducted and held for ransom in Bitcoin. Authorities confirmed the victims were safely freed, with 7 individuals arrested. 💌 @atwire | @dyingactor

😭3

14 Apr 2026, 10:23 UTC529 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ JUST IN: Fake Ledger Live App on Apple Store Linked to $9.5M Theft Fake “Ledger Live” app on Apple App Store drained $9.5M+ from 50+ victims (Apr 7–13) across BTC, EVM, Tron, Solana & XRP. Largest losses: • $3.23M USDT (Apr 9) • $2.07M USDC (Apr 11) • $1.95M BTC/ETH/stETH (Apr 8) Laundered via 150+ KuCoin deposit addresses tied to “AudiA6” mixer. The fake app was removed by Apple yesterday. 💌 @atwire | @dying

👀2🤯1

12 Apr 2026, 23:59 UTC478 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️UPDATE: Victim who lost 5.9 BTC (~$400K) to a fake Ledger app receives 2 BTC donation The victim raised ~2 BTC (~$190K) in support after losing their entire Bitcoin savings to a malicious Ledger app targeting MacBook users. 💌 @atwire | @dyingactor

3

12 Apr 2026, 23:58 UTC440 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ JUST IN: Crypto whale loses 5.9 BTC (~$400K+) after downloading a malicious “Ledger” app from the App Store A fake Ledger app currently listed on the App Store is prompting users to connect wallets and enter their seed phrase, leading to full wallet compromise 💌 @atwire | @dyingactor

1

12 Apr 2026, 22:20 UTC422 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ JUST IN: A threat actor is selling a phishing kit mimicking Ledger wallet interfaces, designed to steal seed phrases and login credentials. The kit includes anti detection features, keylogging, and Telegram alerts for real time victim tracking. In yesterday's case, a user reportedly lost 5.92 BTC after installing a malicious fake Ledger app from the App Store.

👀4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @atwire. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,349,827 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“wire” (@atwire), 1,007 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atwire.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.