Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Гегий от слова гений

@atsusimp666

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

626subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002060776320
TypeChannel
Username@atsusimp666
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/atsusimp666

Growth

626629627.56 August 2026 — 629 subscribers6 August 2026 — 629 subscribers7 August 2026 — 628 subscribers13 August 2026 — 626 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 626–629 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:46626-2
7 Aug 2026, 01:14628-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:33629no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:37629first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 25 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
140.6%
avg views ÷ 626 subscribers
Avg views / post
880
1 post measured
Reaction rate
8.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held15 (25 February 202627 July 2026)
Views total880
Reactions total78
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

738 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 539133733988260429617123.2%
custom 541141456823468589313518.3%
custom 539123469445920210110314.0%
9813.3%
custom 53887583408703803937610.3%
custom 54135876713626122567410.0%
custom 5388619849649919991689.21%
custom 5395655860779259714121.63%
custom 539123517549553514110.136%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 738reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 14 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @atsusimp666. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 February 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 20:57 UTCviews —34 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

22custom 539133733988260429610custom 53886198496499199912

16 Jul 2026, 11:47 UTC880 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026

☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ ☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️: 🤩Художники:🤩 🧷@linashesh 🧷@CtylKreslo 🧷@blacrywanttosleep 🧷@Eblanchiiik 🧷@restingkissface 🧷@marmarmarusya 🧷@b0rtegul 🧷@Kory002 🧷@Knmbm789 🧷@dostoharova 🧷@YANYANAYANAYA 🧷@curd_etc 🧷@mmoewk 🧷@lolfytch 🧷@elk_40 🧷@sssaiko 🧷@pyzyohayo 🧷@NefliOC ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🤩Писатели:🤩 🧷@Tuanohcka 🧷@CHUIKALIWW 🧷@Hahidare 🧷@restingkissface  ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ❗️Через время мы с Сан отправим ва

custom 539123469445920210116custom 541358767136261225698custom 54114145682346858936custom 53886198496499199912custom 53913373398826042962custom 53912351754955351411

8 Jul 2026, 20:06 UTC770 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Помните тут про ивентик да?

custom 538861984964991999120custom 539133733988260429643custom 53912346944592021011

8 Jul 2026, 20:06 UTC767 views58 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩Акутагава Рюноске коротко про Ацуши Накаджиму:🤩 🤩🤩🤩 #ученые #коротко_о (Картиночка описывает Ацуши) "Мне нечего говорить про него. Как вообще подчиненный должен относиться к своему "начальнику"? Мне многие говорят о том, какой Накаджима строгий и злой, что он очень много кричит и жалуется на других. В основном это говорят те, кто находятся у него на практике, и мне кажется, что они зря обвиняют Н

custom 541141456823468589325custom 539123469445920210111custom 5413587671362612256104custom 53886198496499199913custom 53887583408703803933custom 53956558607792597142

1 Jul 2026, 15:20 UTC794 views35 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Привет ребята, тут у нас это самое...🥺🥺

custom 5413587671362612256255custom 53886198496499199913custom 53887583408703803932

1 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC583 views39 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @swallowcoalsPhoto

🎀 ☺️🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬 ☺️🥬🥬🥬🥬 ☺️🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬 🎀 от глотай угли и гегий от слова гений ДЛЯ ХУДОЖНИКОВ И ПИСАТЕЛЕЙ 🌟 В чём суть ивента? 🤩 Суть ивента — показать Ацуши и Рюноске в условиях апокалипсиса. Это может быть абсолютно любой тип апокалипсиса: мир после ядерной войны, зомби-эпидемия, техногенная катастрофа, климатический и экологический кризис, вторжение инопланетян или любой

custom 5391337339882604296179custom 53887583408703803935custom 53912346944592021015custom 54114145682346858932custom 53886198496499199911

17 Jun 2026, 09:06 UTC845 views64 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я что-то совсем с концами начала пропадать....вы там вообще как?

custom 539123469445920210134custom 539133733988260429613custom 541141456823468589395custom 54135876713626122562custom 53886198496499199911

17 Jun 2026, 08:58 UTC916 views54 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩Ацуши Накаджима коротко про Акутагаву Рюноске:🤩 🤍🤍 #ученые #коротко_о (Картиночка описывает Акутагаву) "Акутагава....я даже не знаю, что мне нужно сказать про него, кроме того, что он единственный, кто не доставляет мне столько проблем и хлопот, как делают это другие. Возможно, с моей стороны это покажется бестактным и грубым — пусть так, — но я считаю, что он гораздо лучше, чем сборище студентов,

custom 5391337339882604296309custom 53887583408703803936custom 53912346944592021014custom 54135876713626122563custom 54114145682346858932

5 May 2026, 15:21 UTC≈1,160 views90 reactions10 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩 С днем рождения, Ацуши Накаджима! 🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩#зарисовка 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩Вновь врываюсь в последний вагон со своей зарисовкой на день рождения моего любимого Ацуши. Спасибо, что я все-таки успела! 🤩🤩🤩Приношу вам новую, одноразовую и коротенькую аушку по шинсам в разводе, которые так и не смогли отпустить и разлюбить друг друга даже спустя большое количество времени и факт новых отношений у Ацуши. 🤩🤩 ⭐️ Часть первая.

custom 539133733988260429643custom 53887583408703803931911custom 539123469445920210110custom 54135876713626122563custom 53886198496499199912custom 54114145682346858932

30 Mar 2026, 20:57 UTC≈1,240 views70 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🙌 #зомби #зарисовка 🙌 🖤 ГЛАВА 1. "ЗДЕСЬ СТОИЛО БЫ ПРИДУМАТЬ ШУТКУ" 🖤 🪽🪽🪽🪽🌧️🖤🖤🦋 😀 Странное ощущение накрывает обоих именно в тот момент, когда вместо ужаса и горького отчаяния от того, что происходит вокруг следует лишь громкий смех и поток нескончаемой иронии. Безусловно, никому не пожелаешь оказаться в таком мире, но до чего же смешной и нелепой оказалась эта дата. Первое Апреля — день дурака, а в случае Ацуши

custom 538875834087038039334custom 538861984964991999113custom 539123469445920210113custom 539133733988260429654custom 54114145682346858931

3 Mar 2026, 17:05 UTC≈1,210 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Разбавляя обстановку и отходя от главы. Появился недавно вопрос, ответ на который мне очень будет интересен: После какой моей аушки/зарисовки вы начали, скажем так, следить за мной? Или какая из моих аушек вам запомнилась больше всего? Мне очень интересно узнать 💛💛

custom 54135876713626122562111custom 53912346944592021017custom 54114145682346858935

3 Mar 2026, 15:09 UTC≈1,170 views84 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

К сожалению нас не порадовали шинсами и Акутагавой, но зато у нас есть Ацуши в куртке и красивые фреймы с ним А еще тот факт что он оставил цветы директору 😭 Больше сказать особо нечего

custom 541141456823468589348custom 539133733988260429619custom 5395655860779259714104custom 53887583408703803932custom 53912346944592021011

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @atsusimp666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 12,818 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Гегий от слова гений” (@atsusimp666), 626 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atsusimp666.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.