Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tolvajkergetők

Channel

Tolvajkergetők

@atolvajkergetok

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

699subscribers

+91 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003149253068
TypeChannel
Username@atolvajkergetok
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/atolvajkergetok

Growth

608699653.57 August 2026 — 608 subscribers8 August 2026 — 608 subscribers15 August 2026 — 613 subscribers22 August 2026 — 631 subscribers29 August 2026 — 682 subscribers7 September 2026 — 699 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net +91. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 594–713 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 08:40699+17
29 Aug 2026, 09:54682+51
22 Aug 2026, 02:59631+18
15 Aug 2026, 11:38613+5
8 Aug 2026, 03:04608no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:17608first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 18s
Average length
1m 18s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

264 reactions across 18 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8030.3%
😁5119.3%
186.82%
🤣124.55%
👏114.17%
🤮114.17%
💯93.41%
🙉72.65%
🥰72.65%
🥱72.65%
🫡72.65%
🙏62.27%
🤯62.27%
🍌51.89%
😢51.89%
🤔51.89%
🤬51.89%
👀41.52%
💊20.758%
🤡20.758%
4 further kinds41.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 264 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC205 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Bartal Andrásék már indulnak is a furgonnal! :D https://hvg.hu/itthon/20260803_a-fidesz-szerint-forsthoffer-agnes-a-sandor-palota-illegalis-lakasfoglaloja

😁8🥰5

28 Jul 2026, 10:46 UTC400 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ő itt Litresits András, a pedofil Zsolti bácsi áldozatának, Bangó Sándornak, alias Sanyikának az ügyvédje. Ő itt még mindig Litresits András, Var(á)nusz Xa(r)ver, a saját rokonát is megrontó pedofil bűnelkövető ügyvédje. Egy sötét tekintetű szkinhead, aki egyszerre véd egy pedofilt, valamint egy másik pedofil áldozatát. Ellentmondás lenne? Aligha, hiszen mindkét ügy több, mint aminek látszik – komoly politikai botr

👍121

20 Jul 2026, 10:29 UTC577 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ha már Magyar Péter az izraeli állampolgársággal is rendelkező Polgár Juditot kívánja felkérni köztársasági elnöknek, a viszonossági elvet alapul véve javasoljuk, hogy Benjámín Netanjáhú mondassa le Jichák Hercogot és kérje fel Polgár Tamást köztársasági elnöknek. Így mindkét országot egy Polgár vezethetné. Mindazonáltal ha már itt tartunk, tennénk néhány alternatív javaslatot: 1, Lakatos Brendon cigány-magyar álla

👍18🥱73🤯1

22 Jun 2026, 06:54 UTC715 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Paszkált beperelte Rogán Antal. Részletek a videóban. Sajnos a NER bukása után ez az ügy már kevésbé izgalmas, de ettől függetlenül tudósítani fogunk róla. Kiderül, hogy a bíróság hogy fogja kezelni egy bukott politikus bosszúhadjáratát. Azt persze most sem fogjuk megtudni, valójában ki és miért ölte meg Nancyt. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8_cAxkK4p0

🤔4

19 Jun 2026, 06:12 UTC721 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Bestiális gyilkosság magyar elkövetőkkel, de amikor elolvasod a cikket és megnézed a videót, mindig rájössz, hogy cigányok... Köszi index és társai... https://index.hu/kulfold/2026/06/18/magyarok-gyilkossag-csaladapa-toronto-kanada-nok-ferfiak-utcai-tamadas-buncselekmeny-bunugy-aldozat-hangoskodas/

🤮11🤬4🖕1

18 Jun 2026, 19:55 UTC606 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

A rasszista Mecser Tamás rendőrfőkapitány cigányokat akar taposni. 😮 https://index.hu/belfold/2026/06/18/rendorfokapitany-mecser-tamas-parlamenti-meghallgatas-tek-rendorseg/

🙏6👍3🥰1

6 Jun 2026, 18:34 UTC626 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁107👍1

29 May 2026, 19:53 UTC767 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Már megint a norvég cserediákok...

🙉72

22 May 2026, 15:52 UTC835 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @szentkoronaradio_officialVideo

LEBUKTATTA MAGÁT A CIGÁNYOK KÖZT RENDET CSAPÓ ÁLZSARU 👮‍♂A Pest vármegyei rendőrök elfogtak egy 43 éves férfit, aki isaszegi vasútállomás aluljárójában több cigányt🐒 tartott fel, mert azok a vonaton hangoskodtak és zavarták az utasokat. A hangoskodó utasokra egy polgárőr figyelt fel, aki értesítette társait, majd feltartóztatták a csoportot és hívták a segélyhívót. 🚨Nem sokkal később jelent meg a helyszínen a 43 év

👍8🫡7

20 May 2026, 13:23 UTC646 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Szakács Árpád is arra gondolt, amire mi: https://www.szakacsarpad.com/p/hogyan-profitalhat-az-afd-sikerebol-konstuktiv-javaslat-a-part-megujulasara

👍10🤡2🔥1🤔1🤨1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @atolvajkergetok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tolvajkergetők” (@atolvajkergetok), 699 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atolvajkergetok.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.