Channel
@atmo_nez
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
569subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001963479758 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @atmo_nez |
| Created | 2 June 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/atmo_nez |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 569 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 570 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 570 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 31 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
251 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 94 | 37.5% | |
| 🔥 | 69 | 27.5% | |
| custom 5318935671719609601 | 34 | 13.5% | |
| custom 5318978629982505708 | 30 | 12.0% | |
| custom 5318955810821259322 | 24 | 9.56% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 251reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2025 to 21 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @atmo_nez. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 May 2025 to 21 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😐 ://ExMachina теперь и в артбуке «Арт Мастерская XXI» от Творческого союза художников России. :// Мне нравится сам момент, когда цифровая работа выходит за пределы экрана и становится частью печатного издания. У неё сразу появляется другой вес, другой контекст, другое ощущение от просмотра. :// Очень ценю такие продолжения жизни у своих работ 🤘
🔥16custom 53189558108212593228custom 53189356717196096016❤2
:// [ ExMachina ] :// Мой новый проект, делал его долго, собирал по кускам и несколько раз переделывал пока не добился того результата, который представлял и этот арт в процессе стал чем-то большим, чем просто работа для выставки. Этот арт целиком и полностью посвящен моей жене 💗 :// Проект в первую очередь показал оффлайн - выставки, печать, публикации 🤘 :// Сейчас выложил подробно с #wip и процессом: Behance // …
🔥19custom 53189558108212593229custom 53189356717196096017❤2
😐 :// НУР продолжает собирать комьюнити цифровых художников Без формальностей - просто место, где арт и технологии двигаются вместе Туда можно попасть из любой точки мира, если у тебя есть серия работ с характером и стилем Без привязки к опыту, без оценок - просто живое пространство для тех, кто делает👍 Если ты чувствуешь этот ритм - вот форма для подачи
🔥10❤7custom 53189786299825057085
😐 :// Доброе утро, киберпанки! :// Пока я набираюсь сил и вдохновения в киберпанк обителей, собирая неоновые референсы и кошмар из проводов в Китае - появилась классная возможность для художников и артистов о которой поделюсь ниже ⏬⏬⏬
custom 531893567171960960111❤5custom 53189786299825057084
🤘:// Приятно - когда твои сцены случайно оказываются в подборке от ребят, по чьим туториалам твой сын делал свои первые шаги в блендере 💚
❤17custom 53189558108212593227custom 53189786299825057083🔥2
Сила текстуринга в действии💥 Работы Artem Filippov — отличный пример того, как грамотная проработка материалов и мелких деталей превращает 3D-сцену в сочный киберпанк-сетап. Берем в референсы ✍️ #вдохновение
❤15custom 53189786299825057086🔥4
😐 //: [ Опен-колл от “Страны Света” — маппинг на Дворцовую ] :// Если ты медиахудожник, моушен-дизайнер, режиссёр анимации или 3D-маппер — держи годную возможность. До 15 июня открыт приём заявок на конкурс современного медиаискусства "Страна СВЕТА – 2025". :// Задача – сделать видеомэппинг-презентацию на тему «Сказки, легенды, мифы» для показа на фасаде здания Штаба Гвардейского корпуса в Санкт-Петербурге. :// Чт…
❤7🔥3custom 53189786299825057083
😐 :// [ Постеры на стену ] // Вдогонку к открыткам - немного моих постеров в интерьере. Печатал их давно, но с цветом тогда всё равно был квест: подгонка профиля, выбор бумаги, чтоб не в синеву и не в кашу. Теперь бы научиться делать это на потоке и нормально отправлять в тубусах 😰 Пусть живут на стенах, а не лежат в папках. :// п.с., да, мы живём в джунглях 🐸
❤17🔥6custom 53189356717196096014custom 53189786299825057082
😐 :// [ Открытки и немного бумажного арта ] :// Иногда хочется, чтобы CG выходил за рамки экрана — поэтому напечатал себе партию открыток с артом. Просто чтобы дарить друзьям. Без продаж и маркетинга — просто приятно делиться. :// На дизайн выходных в Казани раздал ещё несколько — маленькие бумажные куски личного мира. :// Потом ребята скинули фото, как открытки устроились у них на полках, столах и в студиях. Любл…
❤14custom 53189356717196096016🔥5custom 53189786299825057083
😐 :// Второй день лекций на Дизайн выходных в Казани. :// IT парк идеально вписывается в эту движуху, но лектории битком, на улице +32° и это добавляет антуража к жарким лекциям о дизайне и спорах за шрифты 😂 :// 7000 дизайнеров (по замерам организаторов), интересные темы дискуссий, кибер-кокошники, крутой опен маркет и всё это настоящий кайф! Впереди еще воркшопы и конечно же афтерпати 🐸
❤8🔥4custom 53189786299825057084
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @atmo_nez. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,261,888 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@atmo_nez named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Atmonez” (@atmo_nez), 569 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atmo_nez.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.