Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Atletico Madrid | Colchoneros

Channel

Atletico Madrid | Colchoneros

@atleticolchoneros

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

161subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003922189344
TypeChannel
Username@atleticolchoneros
DescriptionДелюсь только своими наблюдениями. Без новостей и прочего Для связи @EluvATM
Created8 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded18 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held1
On Telegramt.me/atleticolchoneros

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 06:22161first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 8 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
344.6%
avg views ÷ 161 subscribers
Avg views / post
555
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026
Posts held17 (8 September 2026 – 17 September 2026)
Views total8,321
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Sept 2026, 06:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2055.6%
👍1644.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Sept 2026, 10:17 UTC≈1,610 views17 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Что еще радует в последних матчах - это движения Гримальдо в центр, как он это делал в «Байере». Отрезками видели это в матче с «Севильей», с «Сосьедадом» он начал делать такие маневры только в концовке, а вчера блуждал на позиции десятки весь первый тайм. Может казаться, что это какой-то зашкварный маневр, который делают все фулбэки, чтобы быть в тренде. Но пока я вижу только плюсы - теперь у Лукмана (и у Ортиса) …

❤9👍8

16 Sept 2026, 18:57 UTC≈1,240 views15 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Нужна была такая победа - без нервов, с разгромом. Самое то, чтобы спокойно готовиться к дерби.

👍8❤7

16 Sept 2026, 17:53 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 18 September 2026

Выносит «Атлетико» соперника по игре, но не по счету. Странное ощущение от Дэвида. С одной стороны мог забивать второй, знает как и в каких зонах открываться, но выглядит тяжеловатым и, простите, как будто он с лишним весом. Связка Ли / Льоренте справа - сбалансированная, на бумаге хорошо друг друга дополняют.

16 Sept 2026, 17:27 UTC819 viewsread 18 September 2026

Вот и Алекс Гримальдо! Левый защитник с позиции правого вингера ассистирует.

16 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC790 viewsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Любопытный состав. Впервые увидим Ли Кан Ина полноценно на фланге без Джулиано. Надеюсь также увидеть Мендосу.

13 Sept 2026, 20:58 UTC576 views1 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Как же классно вышел Арнау Ортис. Отличная игра от обеих команд. Но главный выход - это все же Коке. Сразу забрали мяч и впервые надолго обосновались на половине «Сосьедада». Для меня открытие - что Гримальдо умеет бить пенки. Мало смотрел «Байер».

❤1

13 Sept 2026, 17:56 UTC445 views1 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

В центре, похоже, будет Льоренте. Не верю в вариант с Баэной

❤1

13 Sept 2026, 07:45 UTC358 views2 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

После травмы Барриоса очевидно, что пару в центре поля составят Коке и Юлманд. Понятно, что в современном футболе требуется хотя бы один опорник, который умеет пасовать, контролировать темп и делать прочие витинья-педриобразные штуки. Но что, если открыть конспекты Эмери или Ковача, у которых пара опорников - это разрушители или бокс-ту-боксы? Не сказать, что прошлосезонная пара Камара - Онана была пасующей: оба б…

❤2

12 Sept 2026, 14:47 UTC276 viewsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Наконец-то Симеоне спросили о Джулиано. Но сам вопрос странный: — Что думаете о кампании, которая разворачивается вокруг Джулиано Симеоне, с утверждениями, что он не должен играть за «Атлетико Мадрид»? Считаете ли вы, что таким образом пытаются атаковать вас через вашего сына? — Мне нечего сказать. Все просто: факты и работа Джулиано говорят сами за себя. Как будто вопрос задавал чиновник, мол, люди так не думают …

10 Sept 2026, 07:18 UTC213 views0 reactionsread 18 September 2026

Пройдемся по каждому игроку из состава после матча с «Ливерпулем» 1. Ян Облак – провел отличный матч, несколько раз выручил. Но на мяче, как мы знаем, он плох. Из-за этого «Атлетико» не мог долго контролировать мяч, хотя явно этого хотел. 2. Марк Пубиль – не понимаю, почему его так сильно занижают. Да, ошибался в передачах, но в обороне традиционно смотрелся солидно. Средний матч относительно той планки, которую он…

9 Sept 2026, 20:58 UTC185 viewsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Первый тайм «Атлетико» провел прекрасно. Пропустили нелогичный гол. Во втором тайме, как и говорил, никто не усилил со скамейки. У «Ливерпуля», например, выходят Фримпонг, Гравенберх, Муньос - вполне основные игроки. В прошлом сезоне проблемой были гостевые матчи, теперь - вторые таймы. Надо что-то с этим делать.

9 Sept 2026, 19:57 UTC168 viewsread 18 September 2026

Эта вариация с Льоренте / Пубилем справа, а Джулиано слева выглядит многообещающе. Теперь проблемы Симеоне-младшего на мяче плюс-минус маскируются, Баена больше берет мяч в той позиции. Видно, что Альварес физически до конца не готов, но сразу дает колоссальную разницу в атаке. Ромеро пока убедителен, но выбор позиции (самая слабая его сторона) хромает, часто необоснованно выдергивается. Думаю «Атлетико» стоит бол…

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @atleticolchoneros. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Atletico Madrid | Colchoneros” (@atleticolchoneros), 161 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atleticolchoneros.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.