Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ATLAS Бронешлемы.

@atlas_armor

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

963subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001874045936
TypeChannel
Username@atlas_armor
DescriptionОфициальный канал компании ATLAS. Заказы только тут vk.ru/atlas_armor
Created16 October 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/atlas_armor

Growth

9637 Aug 2026, 13:06 — 963 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 00:47 — 963 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:068 Aug 2026, 00:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 962–964 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 00:47963no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:06963first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 30 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.3%
avg views ÷ 963 subscribers
Avg views / post
282
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.709%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held13 (30 April 202620 July 2026)
Views total282
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
441
Videos
99
Links
91

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10m 39s
Average length
3m 33s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

90 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4347.8%
👍2123.3%
1516.7%
😁66.67%
🆒22.22%
11.11%
💩11.11%
🤗11.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 13:33 UTC282 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ptsr_teamPhoto

Фулл-комплект от Milgear РБУ Gen.1. Ares, Mantis, поджопник Ursus защищают и дают комфорт на мототехнике. Голову как обычно защищает ATLAS MK2. Покатались, полетали, прогулялись! Всем 🅰️🫡 «Безымянный»

1🔥1

1 Jul 2026, 07:50 UTC575 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @uavuralVideo

С просторов 😄

😁61

22 Jun 2026, 03:31 UTC≈5,870 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Близкий друг, давний пользователь наших бронешлемов и по совместительству один из админов @ptsr_team🤙🏾

🔥5

1 Jun 2026, 03:52 UTC944 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @disarmi_blyaVideo

Дорогие мои! Свершилось, обзор шлема новой генерации, а так же лицевой системы (она же мандибула) от компании ATLAS! На этапе проходок я таскал этот шлем 3 дня к ряду, на разные дистанции и по разной местности. Крайний проход который вы видите воочию, составил 8 километров пути, 3 из которых проходили по ебануто-заросшей местности. Разберем весь шлем как комплект, включая мандибулу и чехол. Плюсы: 1. Класс защит

👍52🔥2

24 May 2026, 08:12 UTC764 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @disarmi_blyaVideo

Дорогие мои! Пока мы делаем полноценный обзор, вот вам небольшое превью броне шлемов ATLAS Чуть больше информации напишу в следующем посте)

🔥7👍1

15 May 2026, 06:40 UTC891 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @two_d_groupPhoto

#Operators Bon Jovi - You Give Love A Bad Name 🎧

🔥321👍1💩1

13 May 2026, 04:05 UTC751 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ptsr_teamPhoto

Всё в ваших руках.

🔥21

8 May 2026, 09:15 UTC≈1,530 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дополненный дубль поста о заметках по форм фактору, возможно кто-то не видел. Заметки на полях📒 Те кто давно с нами помнят, что когда то давно мы производили "полуухие" шлемы формата Mich 2002 на базе платформы АСН\Mich, в силу обратной связи, эксплуатационных особенностей данного форм фактора, и равности значений в площади защиты, мы заменили его на OpsCore fast. Но! Работы по данному направлению шлемов не закончи

👍21🔥1

8 May 2026, 09:15 UTC≈1,160 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Наглядно о посадке нового и старого бронешлемов. Далее развернуто:

👍2🔥2

4 May 2026, 14:00 UTC≈1,360 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Данную "платформу" бронешлемов мы разрабатывали с 2019 года, но ввиду "обстоятельств" 2022г. было принято решение отложить переход, и сосредоточится на имеющихся в тот момент решениях. Так продолжалось примерно до осени прошлого года, когда удалось провести и закончить "пусконаладку" нового оборудования, и ряд очередных испытаний и проверок, перед запуском изделия в серию. И это не конец эволюции данной платформы, сл

👍54🔥2🤗1🆒1

4 May 2026, 14:00 UTC773 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Начнем с того, что многое изменилось 😎 Теперь официально Бронешлемы ATLAS выполняются в новом формфате, на базе доработанного OpsCore Sentry, вместо классического АСН и FAST. Новые форм-факторы бронешлемов унифицированы между собой, для ускорения и упрощения производства. Размерная сетка так же в трех размерах, но немного отличается для "Ушастого" и "Безухого". "Безухий" форм-фактор как и говорилось унифицирован с н

🔥11👍43🆒1

4 May 2026, 06:54 UTC748 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ptsr_shopPhoto

Закаты гораздо прекраснее на боевых,так же в кадре шлем от t.me/atlas_armor Все ещё в наличии: - "МРАЧНЫЕ" - Квадрат - Треугольник олива об

🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @atlas_armor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ATLAS Бронешлемы.” (@atlas_armor), 963 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atlas_armor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.