Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for تلخ همچون چای سرد

Channel

تلخ همچون چای سرد

@atiyeeblogir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,096subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001040490950
TypeChannel
Username@atiyeeblogir
Created9 March 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/atiyeeblogir

Growth

3,0803,0963,0885 August 2026 — 3,080 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,080 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,081 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,090 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,093 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,096 subscribers5 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,078–3,098 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:443,096+3
12 Aug 2026, 15:243,093+3
9 Aug 2026, 12:023,090+9
6 Aug 2026, 07:313,081+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:513,080no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:363,080first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.5%
avg views ÷ 3,096 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held17 (3 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total9,437
Reactions total248
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

458 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
39185.4%
👍6514.2%
👎20.437%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 458reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC487 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

اون دلی که شکست، مال کی بود؟ @atiyeeblogir

9

Signed Atiye Mirzaamiri

26 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC≈1,870 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

نمی‌دونم واقعا. کاش کیارستمی بودم. بلد بودم قدر یه چیزهایی رو بدونم. قدر درخت. قدر زندگی. قدر آسمون، هوا، بارون. قدر همین چیزهای کوچیک.

34

Signed Atiye Mirzaamiri

23 Jul 2026, 10:59 UTC≈1,480 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

‏انسان گیاه نیست و بهار زندگی‌اش تکرار نمی‌شود. ‏[آسیا | تورگنیف]

36👎1

Signed Atiye Mirzaamiri

22 Jul 2026, 16:21 UTC≈1,520 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026

خیلی حالم بد بود. رو تخت دراز کشیده بودم و یهو چشمم خورد به کتابی که این روزها می‌خونم. یهو دیدم من نویسنده‌ی موردعلاقه دارم. نویسنده‌ای که اگر هرجایی اسمی ازش ببینم، قطعا سمت اون کتاب یا هرچیزی که به اون نویسنده ربط داشته باشه، میرم. بعد سر همین احساس خوشبختی کردم. احساس خوشبختی برای نویسنده‌ی مورد علاقه داشتن توی این زندگی!

43

Signed Atiye Mirzaamiri

22 Jul 2026, 08:29 UTC≈1,680 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

قلبم ملتهبه. یک دمل چرکی روی روحم نشسته. به این فکر می‌کنم چطور خودم را نجات دهم؟ تنها چیزی که به ذهنم می‌رسد گم شدگی است. گم شدن و پناه به چنین فضایی. زیر تله‌ای نور و باد، سرگرم کتاب و نوشتن. با مرهم‌هایی از جانب خود. بدون تیرهایی از جانب دیگری‌ها. @atiyeeblogir

27👍5

Signed Atiye Mirzaamiri

19 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTC≈1,340 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @maneaashofte

چند سال پیش،یک دوستی مجازی ای با کسی داشتم،چون ظریف و نازک بین بود می توانستیم باهم حرف بزنیم.اشتراک دیگری نداشتیم.توی جهان هم جا نشدیم.کم کم فاصله گرفتیم و تمام شد. چند روز ‌پیش،یک پیام عادی امد روی موبایلم،نوشته بود:من آسترالیا هستم. خنده ام گرفت. اصلن یادم نبود که قصه ای که فقط بین من و دو سه نفر از دوستهایم بود را برایش تعریف کرده ام یک روزی. ماجرا این بود که محل کارشوهر یکی از دوست های صمیمی من آستارا بود .چند

30👍5👎1

Signed Atiye Mirzaamiri

19 Jul 2026, 10:29 UTC≈1,060 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026

از نوشته‌های بدون فکر: ما از بچگی با همسایه‌هامون خیلی صمیمی بودیم و رفت‌وآمد داشتیم. از یه سالی به بعد که به‌قول معروف سن ازدواج من بود، خانم یکی از همسایه‌ها وقتی من رو می‌دیدید می‌پرسید: «خبری نیست؟» و وقتی می‌فهمید جدی جدی خبری نیست با خوش‌رویی تکرار می‌کرد سخت نگیر و ... . متوجه نیت صحبتش بودم، متوجه بودم که این مکالمه کاملا مختص این سن‌وساله و یه جور ارتباط گرفتنه، اما خوشایندم نبود و هربار واقعا اذیت می‌شدم.

46👍11

Signed Atiye Mirzaamiri

18 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC987 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

کتاب سومی که معرفی کردم: https://www.instagram.com/p/Da8IaKJCAux/?igsh=bm5qenp1ZTV0MW5v

4

Signed Atiye Mirzaamiri

14 Jul 2026, 19:22 UTC≈6,070 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

‏از رایج‌ترین/دردناک‌ترین احساسات‌ انسانی، احساسِ حذف‌شدگی‌ست ما معمولاً عضو چند حلقه از دوستانِ نزدیک هستیم و گاه حس می‌کنیم که از این حلقه‌ها بیرون مانده‌ایم. پرسشِ دردناک این است: من به اندازهٔ کافی «نزدیک» نبودم؟ و‌ ناگهان می‌فهمیم چقدر به دوستِ نزدیک محتاجیم. ‏ ابراهیم سلطانی @atiyeeblogir

26👍8

Signed Atiye Mirzaamiri

13 Jul 2026, 08:42 UTC≈1,410 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

‏کتاب دوم: ‏کتاب تالیفی که هم مناسب بچه‌هاست و هم مناسب آدم بزرگا! ‏چون به هرحال: ‏از نظرگاه است مغز وجود ‏اختلاف مومن و گبر و یهود ‏نویسنده علی اصغر سیدآبادی ‏تصویرگر هادی بغدادی ‏از انتشارات طوطی @atiyeeblogir

19

Signed Atiye Mirzaamiri

13 Jul 2026, 08:41 UTC≈1,160 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

‏من یه سری کتاب‌ها رو توی دسته‌ی «کودک‌بزرگسال» می‌ذارم. یعنی کتابی که اکثر صفحات تصویریه و نوشتار کمی داره،اما موضوع فلسفیش برای بزرگساله. ‏مثل کتاب «روح گمشده».زیباترین مفهوم و تصویرگری رو داره. موضوع عمیقش درمورد اینه که گاهی روحمون از سرعت زندگی جا می‌مونه و یهو بی‌روح میشیم! @atiyeeblogir

19

Signed Atiye Mirzaamiri

11 Jul 2026, 18:55 UTC≈1,200 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

علی الحساب این پست زیبای کتابیم رو ببینید، فردا برای کسایی که اینستاگرام ندارند اینجا اکران می‌کنم:)

7

Signed Atiye Mirzaamiri

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @atiyeeblogir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 292,737 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تلخ همچون چای سرد” (@atiyeeblogir), 3,096 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atiyeeblogir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.