Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tirtha 🇺🇦

Channel

Tirtha 🇺🇦

@atirtha

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

9,723subscribers

-92 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001486609185
TypeChannel
Username@atirtha
DescriptionПриглашение в Чат https://t.me/TirthaBTG Welcome to BTG chat in English. https://t.me/TirthaPerpetuumMobile
Created6 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/atirtha

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,7219,8169,768.56 August 2026 — 9,815 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,815 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,816 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,810 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,800 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,804 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,802 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,798 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,781 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,782 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,784 subscribers7 September 2026 — 9,783 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,787 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,782 subscribers19 September 2026 — 9,774 subscribers30 September 2026 — 9,760 subscribers7 October 2026 — 9,759 subscribers13 October 2026 — 9,748 subscribers16 October 2026 — 9,750 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,745 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,738 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,732 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,728 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,726 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,728 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,727 subscribers8 November 2026 — 9,721 subscribers11 November 2026 — 9,723 subscribers9,7236 August 202611 November 2026
28 measurements spanning 98 days, net -92. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,707–9,830 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 21:559,723+2
8 Nov 2026, 06:469,721-6
4 Nov 2026, 18:169,727-1
1 Nov 2026, 21:519,728+2
30 Oct 2026, 05:569,726-2
26 Oct 2026, 21:409,728-4
24 Oct 2026, 06:519,732-6
21 Oct 2026, 12:479,738-7
18 Oct 2026, 20:189,745-5
16 Oct 2026, 03:079,750+2
13 Oct 2026, 04:279,748-11
7 Oct 2026, 03:419,759-1
30 Sept 2026, 01:379,760-14
19 Sept 2026, 16:019,774-8
15 Sept 2026, 07:559,782-5
11 Sept 2026, 20:599,787+4
7 Sept 2026, 06:189,783-1
2 Sept 2026, 03:529,784+2
30 Aug 2026, 13:259,782+1
27 Aug 2026, 20:119,781first reading

Engagement

109 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 9,723 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,370
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.895%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 109 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held109 (28 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total24,720
Reactions total219
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 11:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,680
Videos
≈5,190
Links
≈1,330

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 52m
Average length
2m 11s

Measured directly from 79 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

799 reactions across 108 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥25431.8%
👍23329.2%
❤11614.5%
😁627.76%
🤔405.01%
👌354.38%
⚡324.01%
😱81.00%
💯70.876%
🙈60.751%
🤯30.375%
👎20.25%
🤷‍♂10.125%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 108 of the 109 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 799 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 109 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (5.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC248 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🆕 Свежая новость от 11.11.2026 ⚠️ Ошибка перевода. ⚠️ Ошибка перевода. 🔗 Источник

Signed CyborgNewsBot

9 Nov 2026, 18:21 UTC970 views26 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Студенты канадского университета вошли в историю ракетостроения! 🚀 Пипец, она все же круглая 😁 Команда ракетостроителей Университета Ватерлоо запустила студенческую жидкостную ракету Polaris на невероятную высоту 63 497 футов — около 19,35 км над Землей.Этот полет побил предыдущий мировой рекорд в 56 590 футов, став самым высоким запуском любительской жидкостной ракеты.17-футовая ракета была спроектирована и построе…

👍14🔥6❤2😁2⚡1👌1

9 Nov 2026, 10:26 UTC≈3,500 views5 reactionsread 12 November 2026

https://youtu.be/45Vv85fmnKA

👌2⚡1❤1🔥1

7 Nov 2026, 11:27 UTC967 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍5🔥3

Signed R.I.V.

4 Nov 2026, 18:48 UTC≈1,290 views20 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥7❤6⚡3👍3👌1

31 Oct 2026, 20:31 UTC≈1,440 views15 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

📹 Магнитная яма своими глазами 🤔🤓

👍14🔥1

31 Oct 2026, 17:57 UTC≈1,260 views9 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @RafaelAnrialPhoto

Вот и увидели установку генератора Шубергера которую повторил Слободян.Именно про неё он рассказывал что на определённых оборотах она давала искажение на видео! Для работы этого БТГ нужно было раскрутить установку до определенных оборотов и она резко начинала мало потреблять.А съём шёл через гидро генератор.Наклон самой спирали на сколько помню 21 градус(обязательно по Фибоначчи и золотому сечению,он проверял другие …

🔥5⚡2👌2

31 Oct 2026, 17:54 UTC≈1,460 views9 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Видео с хорошим звуком и качеством

🔥5👌2⚡1🤯1

30 Oct 2026, 11:30 UTC≈1,620 views14 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Сгоревшая лаборатория Андрея Слободяна: кадры после сильного пожара На видео Шон, помощник изобретателя Андрея Слободяна, показывает последствия разрушительного пожара в лаборатории, где велись работы над БТГ бестопливным генератором, известным как «Крутилка Слободяна». На кадрах можно увидеть обгоревшее помещение, повреждённое оборудование, остатки электронных компонентов и элементы конструкции знаменитой «Крутилки»…

❤8😱4🔥2

30 Oct 2026, 11:22 UTC860 views12 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @RafaelAnrialPhoto

Крутилка Слободяна после пожара

❤8🔥3🤯1

28 Oct 2026, 23:06 UTC≈1,140 views12 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍7🔥2⚡1❤1👌1

28 Oct 2026, 16:50 UTC971 views16 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @Video_Nauch_TirthaVideo

🧲 Опыты Фарадея, которые помогли лучше понять природу электричества

👍12🔥2⚡1❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 109 posts we hold for @atirtha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@atirtha edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @atirtha as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
25 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
22 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tirtha 🇺🇦” (@atirtha), 9,723 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atirtha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.