бля может зря я переехал

Channel
ПЕРЕЕЗД @ATTENTIONPORTF ПЕРЕЕЗД @ATTENTIONPORTF ПЕРЕЕЗД @ATTENTIONPORTF ПЕРЕЕЗД @ATTENTIONPORTF ПЕРЕЕЗД @ATTENTIONPORTF ПЕРЕЕЗД
@atieujd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
47subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002205198583 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @atieujd |
| Description | заказы открыты ВСЕГДА !! писать: @W3Rtu2 материал: @mafiaetos1 @MGNHLP @SMARThlp @passion_hlp @IM4GEHLP @melody_my_melody |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/atieujd |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 47 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 67
- Links
- 24
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
480 reactions across 12 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5280922999241859582 | 70 | 14.6% | |
| custom 5326051066729487573 | 37 | 7.71% | |
| custom 5456216132308462012 | 35 | 7.29% | |
| custom 5073560096995279592 | 32 | 6.67% | |
| custom 5364096209160008881 | 27 | 5.63% | |
| 🆒 | 20 | 4.17% | |
| 💘 | 20 | 4.17% | |
| custom 5280651583078556009 | 19 | 3.96% | |
| custom 5280858699286471614 | 18 | 3.75% | |
| custom 5280501615705480800 | 17 | 3.54% | |
| custom 5280511481245361900 | 17 | 3.54% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 3.13% | |
| custom 5463137996091962323 | 13 | 2.71% | |
| 🐳 | 13 | 2.71% | |
| custom 5280947338821524402 | 11 | 2.29% | |
| custom 5357317569650911348 | 10 | 2.08% | |
| custom 5364288168428334204 | 10 | 2.08% | |
| custom 5373236586760651455 | 10 | 2.08% | |
| custom 5462990652943904884 | 10 | 2.08% | |
| custom 5255956191141454203 | 9 | 1.88% | |
| 11 further kinds | 67 | 14.0% |
Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 480reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2025 to 18 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 35
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 4
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
- Most on one post
- 23
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @atieujd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 March 2025 to 18 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
подписываемся СРОЧНО
—— 𝗔͟͟𝘁͟͟𝘁͟͟𝗲͟͟𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 -> 𝖭𝖾𝗐 𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗋 🩵 ᯾ 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝘆𝗼𝘂 ≥ : @практика 𝗟𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗺𝗲 : 𝗛𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗺𝗲 time : 14 hours мнение: вроде азуенно, а вроде руина, а вроде скопировал. ну, вообще мне нравится эта работа, от нее вайбы вируса, а аттентион со своим лором тут очень пригодиля копирование строго запрещено
𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝖶𝖮𝖱𝖪 𝜗𝜚 𝗔𝗧𝗧𝗘NTION.com 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲: 11 Hours 🔍 𝗙𝗼𝗿: liya’s hb ㅤㅤ 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿 копирование строго запрещено
ᅠ 𝗔𝗧𝗧𝗘NTION / 가족🔍 : 𝙋ortfolio an𝗼𝗻 me͟͟s͟͟s͟͟age < 𝑊nd 𝟵𝟬𝘀 문 > Conn𝗲𝗰𝘁 ⌨ info𝗿𝗺 🌐 _ Pint
—— 𝗔͟͟𝘁͟͟𝘁͟͟𝗲͟͟𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 -> 𝖭𝖾𝗐 𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗋 🩵 ᯾ 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝘆𝗼𝘂 ≥ : @блог 𝗟𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗺𝗲 : 𝗛𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗺𝗲 time : 3-5 hours мнение: чето хуйня,задумка была прикольная,но реализация мне не так сильно нравится,хотя, возможно, я себя занижаю😁 копирование строго запрещено
custom 528085869928647161411🐳10☃9custom 54562161323084620124
—— 𝗔͟͟𝘁͟͟𝘁͟͟𝗲͟͟𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 -> 𝖭𝖾𝗐 𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗋 ❤️ ᯾ 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝘆𝗼𝘂 ≥ : @youngyugenm 𝗟𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗺𝗲 : 𝗛𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗺𝗲 time : 5 hours мнение: ахуеть. начнем с того,что аватарка выглядит менее хорошо,чем разделители. ноооо,мне нравится,что получилось,хотя сначала вообще не знал что именно делать с этой работой. итог в принципе меня радует. копирование строго запрещено
custom 52559561911414542039custom 53640962091600088819custom 52809473388215244028custom 52805114812453619003
ᅠ🖤 𝄒 HAPPY 𝗡𝗘𝗢 . 𝗗𝗔𝗬 / 𝟤𝟩𝟢𝟦 ᅠ赤い : ♪ На часах пробила полночь — а это значит, наступил очень важный момент: начался день рождение Нео! Новый год жизни только открыл свои двери, впереди множество ярких событий, тёплых встреч и радостных эмоций. Давайте вместе заглянем в мир его поздравлений — почувствуем, сколько любви, заботы и искренних слов дарят ему друзья. И, конечно же, присоединимся к этим тёплым пожеланиям, чт…
⬜⬜⬜🤩< 𝕹𝖤𝖮'𝗌 𝖡.𝖣𝖠Y -- [<3] этот канал сделан для очень крутого человека, продолжай сиять так же ярко.
ℌ𝖺𝗉𝗉𝗒 𝖻𝗂𝗋𝗍𝗁𝖽⍺𝗒 - 𝔐𝗒 𝖿𝖺𝗏𝗈𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝖻𝗈𝗒 💕 этот канал - мои чувства к тебе и то как я их выражаю через этот канал 27.04 > ♡ 𝔐𝗒 𝖿𝖺𝗏𝗈𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖾 ∂𝖺y / >33.
—— 𝗔͟͟𝘁͟͟𝘁͟͟𝗲͟͟𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 -> 𝖭𝖾𝗐 𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗋 🩷 ᯾ 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝘆𝗼𝘂 ≥ : @horieoi 𝗟𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗺𝗲 : 𝗛𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗺𝗲 time : 2 hours, 2-3 дня на задумку мнение: такая работа вабйовая,тот самый момент,когда работа буквально пахнет весной. но изначально я вообще не хотел ее выставлять,но подкорректировав ее немного в снс виде,то понял,что реально вайьыыы копирование строго запрещено
custom 53191754382689132558💘7custom 53305509941598159307custom 52583931341103639855custom 53192474691654337984
—— 𝗔͟͟𝘁͟͟𝘁͟͟𝗲͟͟𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 -> 𝖭𝖾𝗐 𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗋 🩵 ᯾ 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝘆𝗼𝘂 ≥ : @attentionportf 𝗟𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗺𝗲 : 𝗛𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗺𝗲 time : 4 hours мнение: мысли сделать новую эру пришли еще давно,примерно спустя 2 недели моя эра перестала мне нравится и я решил,что это время для новой работы,которая возможно станет эрой. так и случилось,мне очень нравится эта работа,потому что обычно я делаю что-то легче,а эта работа прчм сияет копирование строго запреще
custom 528092299924185958215custom 50735600969952795927custom 53260510667294875737custom 54562161323084620126
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @atieujd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 864,146 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@atieujd named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПЕРЕЕЗД @ATTENTIONPORTF ПЕРЕЕЗД @ATTENTIONPORTF ПЕРЕЕЗД @ATTENTIONPORTF ПЕРЕЕЗД @ATTENTIONPORTF ПЕРЕЕЗД @ATTENTIONPORTF ПЕРЕЕЗД” (@atieujd), 47 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atieujd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.