Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

[закрыто] Religion Trigger confession

@atheismconf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

280subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002437689854
TypeChannel
Username@atheismconf
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/atheismconf

Growth

2807 Aug 2026, 17:40 — 280 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:33 — 280 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:408 Aug 2026, 08:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 279–281 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 08:33280no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:40280first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
153
Videos
57
Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 38s
Average length
1m 19s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

268 reactions across 18 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5922.0%
💔2710.1%
269.70%
🤝259.33%
🔥248.96%
😢238.58%
❤‍🔥155.60%
🍾124.48%
🤬114.10%
😭103.73%
👌93.36%
🤗51.87%
👾41.49%
🎄31.12%
😨31.12%
20.746%
💘20.746%
💯20.746%
😐20.746%
😱20.746%
2 further kinds20.746%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 268reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2025 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Jul 2026, 16:44 UTC91 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Продам канал за 100 рублей

😭8

Signed Оля

15 Feb 2026, 08:05 UTC298 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @petrovtelPhoto

В РПЦ призвали молиться за «вразумление» чиновников из-за замедления Telegram Для многих соотечественников мессенджер стал не просто средством связи, но и пространством для молитвы, душевного разговора и помощи ближнему, считает священнослужитель Александр Микушин. Поэтому, по его словам, сотрудникам Роскомнадзора и Минцифры следует одуматься. КК 🐀

👌9💘21

Signed Оля

5 Feb 2026, 08:09 UTC332 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vgostyaxmanVideo

🎧В РПЦ заявили, что россиянки, решающиеся на аборт, несут ответственность за продолжение СВО. По словам представителей церкви, к «виновным» они также относят экстрасенсов, колдунов, тарологов, нумерологов и гадалок — священники утверждают, что «ведьм» стало в три раза больше.

🤬7😨3

Signed Оля

5 Feb 2026, 08:09 UTC299 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вот вам новости, раз не отписались

❤‍🔥5

Signed Оля

16 Jan 2026, 05:07 UTC425 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Канал продаётся, цена договорная. Писать @vetrayer Актуально до удаления поста

💔16😢61

Signed Оля

16 Jan 2026, 05:06 UTC424 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мне надоел кф, всем пока

😢17💔11🤬4

Signed Оля

11 Jan 2026, 09:49 UTC467 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Добрый день, хочу напомнить, что в нашем кф обсуждается негативный опыт, ПРИЧИНОЙ которого стала религия (или религиозные люди и тп.). Мне искренне жаль, если вы переживаете тяжелое время. Мы можем даже порадоваться за тех, кто после страшных событий нашёл покой в вере, но тейки с подобным содержанием не публикуются. Всего хорошего

20

Signed Оля

7 Jan 2026, 20:03 UTC468 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

как же заебали мусульмане из регионов рф типо дагестана. "новый год харам" БЛЯТЬ ТЫ ЖИВЕШЬ В СВЕТСКОЙ СТРАНЕ. здесь свобода вероисповедания и даже если в твоем регионе большинство мусульмане это не значит что все жители обязаны исповедовать ислам. они требуют к себе уважения а потом толпами совершают намаз в москве. представили их лица если у них в дагестане крестный ход совершить?) в тик токе читала коммент что чело

🤝2522❤‍🔥1👾1🙏1

Signed Оля

7 Jan 2026, 18:04 UTC389 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Почему мусульмане не могут нормально поработать над имиджем своей религии? они всё ещё выглядят как варварская секта #тейк > @atheismconf Adm: мусульман очень много, значит их все устраивает..

🤗5😭2👾1

Signed Оля

7 Jan 2026, 09:40 UTC376 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Мусульмане: почему нас воспринимают как секту? Также мусульмане: #тейк > @atheismconf

2😱2👾1😇1

Signed Оля

4 Jan 2026, 07:04 UTC318 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я придумала, как отомстить маме с её христианским культом >:3. Я случайно вдарилась в славянско-языческую культуру--. Ну, настолько, насколько можно всего вдариться в нынешних реалиях И теперь у меня на все её закидоны есть уно реверс. Типа она поздравляет меня с рождеством - я поздравляю её с зимним солнцестоянием--. Сегодня вот устроила "пожар"(пафосно свечку подожгла) и позвала её смотреть на это после того как ме

🔥16

Signed ciabatta

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @atheismconf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 718,874 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[закрыто] Religion Trigger confession” (@atheismconf), 280 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atheismconf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.