Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

哲学与宗教

@atheism_discuss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

916subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001453460651
TypeChannel
Username@atheism_discuss
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/atheism_discuss

Growth

916917916.512 Aug 2026, 16:03 — 917 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 21:06 — 916 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 16:0312 Aug 2026, 21:06
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 916–917 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:06916-1
12 Aug 2026, 16:03917first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 23 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 44s
Average length
1m 44s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

5 May 2026, 15:09 UTC274 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

“我不能这么做,因为这么做有违我的信仰。” —— 这是信仰自由。 “你不能这么做,因为这么做有违我的信仰。” —— 这不是什么信仰自由。 source

10 Feb 2026, 20:10 UTC611 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

这个网友解释的印度神话倒是挺好理解的 source

27 Jan 2026, 00:48 UTC612 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

想象一下,如果我们用描绘原住民宗教的方式,去描绘天主教 —— 恐怖电影中的女主角缓缓打开一本圣经,说道:根据记载,很久很久以前,有一位半人半神被一群暴徒捉住,遭受了可怕的折磨。最后,暴徒把他钉在了两根木头架起的十字上,任由他活活饿死... 但是,几天后,就在今夜这个日子!这些暴徒看到本已死透的半人神缓缓爬出了墓地... 如今,这位半人神的信众们正在苦苦等待人神的再次现身。为了纪念这位半人神,信众们每周聚在一起,举行仪式,吟唱颂歌,然后在仪式结束之后生啖这位半人神的血肉。 女主角的朋友听了,不由吓了一跳:天呐...好瘆人... 马上会死掉的人傻胆大的男生:有什么好怕的,不过是个神话传说而已! source

30 Oct 2025, 21:58 UTC857 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

近日,这段关于人体构造的讨论引发了几万网友的参与和转发 —— 甲:我们的身体构造如此精妙,这正是造物主存在的证明。 乙:我们喉咙里有两个管道,一个是“吃的东西必须从这里进入”的食管,一个是“吃的东西绝对不能从这里进入”的气管,两者并排相连,开口之处紧贴在一起,难分你我。 丙:假如人体是一座城市,那造人区和享乐区正紧连着城市的化粪池。如果这是真的是一位设计师设计出来的,这位设计师应该立即被炒鱿鱼。 丁:我们演化出了双足行走的能力,但我们膝盖的强度却完全没有跟上。 戊:在人类的演化中,人类的头越来越大,人类的屁股却没有等比变大,因此我们必须提前把根本没有发育成熟的胎儿生下来。拿人类做“造物主存在”的证据,你是认真的吗? source

2 Oct 2025, 16:15 UTC744 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

天主教民俗: 1. 丢东西找不到的时候把圣安东尼抱着的耶稣宝宝藏到圣像底座里,等到圣安东尼指引你找到失物后再把耶稣宝宝还给他。 2. 卖房子的时候把圣约瑟夫倒埋在院子里,等到圣约瑟夫帮助你成功卖掉房子之后再把他挖出来。 3. 把圣徒们邀请出来祈雨,如果圣徒们没有履行职责下雨,就把圣徒们倒过来放进井里,直到这些圣徒成功完成降雨为止。 评论:我终于明白为什么我太奶总说“有东西找不到了就找圣安东尼帮忙”了... 评论:猜猜为什么圣安东尼的底座总是有一个小抽屉... 评论:我们巴西的风俗是找不到东西的时候先把圣安东尼倒挂在井里( 评论:我邻居买了个圣安东尼,因为她想找男朋友😂 评论:是的,找对象确实是圣安东尼的标准业务之一! 评论:我们哥伦比亚人也用圣安东尼找对象! 评论:我们巴西人用圣安东尼找对象的时候会先把圣安东尼关在冰箱里( 评论:还愿的时候要记得跳三跳哦 source

24 Aug 2025, 04:43 UTC861 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Love seeing something from TikTok and going “girlie that is literally what led to the downfall of the Papal States” Jewish baby named Edgardo Mortara is seemingly about to die in Bologna, 1851 Catholic nanny secretly baptises him to save his soul, which she’s not exactly the kind of authority who can do that, but w/e, it’s interpreted by the church as valid later Kid survives 1857 her secret gets out, a baptising

23 Jul 2025, 23:15 UTC854 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @zhihu_bazaar

从逻辑上讲,“祖宗保佑”和“投胎转世”是否自相矛盾? | 原文

2 Mar 2025, 17:33 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translateVideo

我以前是一个摩门教徒(摩门教的正式名字是耶稣基督后期圣徒教会)。那时候,我是摩门教徒里很常见的那种“传统的妻子”。 那是五年前。我38岁。有六个孩子。我结婚很早,一结婚就开始生孩子。我没有受过正经的教育,为了“选择”那样的生活,我放弃了我所有的梦想。 那时候,如果你问我,我的人生是不是我自己的选择。我会很自信地和你说,是的。我选择成为一个“传统的妻子”。我对我这个选择非常满意。成为“传统的妻子”是我在全面了解之后自主自愿的选择。我非常快乐。 现在,我完全离开摩门教已经整整三年了。回过头去看,我看得非常清楚了,我在摩门教的三十多年来,我从来没有真正有过任何选择的机会。 那种感觉就像有人给我十个糖果让我自由挑选,但这个人和我说,看,这个糖果是正确的糖果,别的九个糖果当然你也完全可以自主自愿选择,但那九个糖果都是有毒的,即使你吃了没死,这种吃下这种邪恶糖果也会让你身边的家人朋友全部都死掉。来,告诉我,你想选哪个糖果呀?我在摩门

24 Feb 2025, 14:40 UTC975 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

从现在开始,我要和所有相信“因为自己是男的所以不能随便哭泣”的人说,他们已经背弃了基督教的信仰! “我是男的我不能哭” “圣经的经文里说耶稣哭泣。耶稣在众多场合下痛哭失声。所以你在说耶稣不是男的?有点意思有点意思” source

24 Feb 2025, 14:40 UTC876 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

天主教学校规定男生不能留长发,但所有教室里又总是挂着一个留长发的男生的照片,而且好像还是那个“最最重要的男生”(指耶稣)😂 source

3 Feb 2025, 01:06 UTC931 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

所以耶稣和人睡觉吗() source

3 Feb 2025, 01:06 UTC832 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

几年前,一位网友公开表示自己在医院做义工的时候曾经偷偷溜进病房为死胎受洗,以免“孩子的灵魂落入地狱”。这位网友声称自己做的是伟大而正确的事情。很快,帖子引发了广泛的关注和讨论。有人评论说,“你知道吗,为什么曾经教宗国如今只剩下了梵蒂冈?” 这里说的,是一段久远的历史了。 1851年,在隶属教宗国的博洛尼亚市(现属意大利),一位名叫埃德加多·莫尔塔拉的犹太婴儿奄奄一息。这时,一名信仰天主教的保姆秘密为他施洗,以“在死前拯救他的灵魂”。尽管原则上这位保姆是没有权力这么做的,后来教会还是判定洗礼有效。 婴儿最终活了下来。 1857年,此事被公之于众。教会认定,埃德加多已受洗成为了天主教徒,而在教宗国,天主教徒不可在非天主教徒的家庭抚养长大。于是,教会动用警察,把埃德加多从其父母身边绑架带走。此事在国际上声名狼藉,而教皇似乎并不能理解为什么包括他的盟友在内的所有人都在谴责他的做法。也是这件事,直接造成拿破仑三世对意大利独立的态度

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @atheism_discuss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,312,899 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“哲学与宗教” (@atheism_discuss), 916 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atheism_discuss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.