Channel photo updated

Channel
النِّطَاسِيّ ے
@atharq04
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
269subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002848621778 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @atharq04 |
| Description | باحثٌ عن المعرفة 📚.. « هِمَّتي هِمَّةُ المُلوكِ وَنَفسي نفسُ حُرٍّ تَرىٰ المَذَلَّةَ كُفرا » عن عبدِ اللهِ بنِ يحيى بنِ أبي كثيرٍ، قال: سَمِعتُ أبي يقولُ: «لا يُستطاعُ العِلمُ براحةِ الجِسمِ». |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/atharq04 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:49 | 269 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:51 | 269 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 270 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 214.5%
- avg views ÷ 269 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 577
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (22 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,964 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 47
- Videos
- 23
- Links
- 19
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
إنَّ الأمور تظل مُتشابكة في الحسِّ والعقل، والطُرق تظل متشابكة في النّظر والفِكر، والباطل يظل متلبِّساً بالحق عند مفارق الطريق، وتظل الحجّة تُفحِم ولكن لا تُقنِع، وتُسكِت ولكن لا يستجيبَ لها القلب والعقل، ويظل الجدل عبثاً، والمناقشة جُهداً ضائِعاً؛ ذلك ما لم تكن هي "التقوى"، فإذا كانت استنار العقل، ووضح الحق، وتكشَّف الطريق، واطمأنَّ القلب، واستراح الضمير، واستقرّت القدم وثبتت على الطريق..! إنَّ الحق في ذاته لا يَخف…
القارئُ المُتأمِّلُ لآياتِ سورةِ الكهفِ يومَ الجمعة، يعيشُ حتمًا وقطعًا حقيقةَ وطعمَ وحلاوةَ التّوحيد ♡~
مُخيف..! يجبُ أن نُعِيدَ ترتيبَ أَولويّاتنا وفقَ المَنظُور القُرآني؛ ليسَ بالنّظر في تفضيلِ أعمالِ الآخرةِ علَى أعمالِ الدُّنيا فحَسب، بل بالنّظرِ في التوفيقِ بينَ العلمِ والعملِ الأُخرَويين! لم يُطْلَب العِلمُ إلّا للعملِ، انشغالنا بالعلمِ على حسابِ العملِ بهِ يُعَدُّ خُسرَانًا في الميزانِ الأُخرَوي!!
العقلُ البشريُّ، حين يعتادُ النِّعمةَ، يتوقَّفُ عن ملاحظتِها! وهذه ظاهرةٌ تُعرَفُ في علمِ النفسِ بـ «التكيُّفِ الإدراكيِّ»، حيثُ يتجاهلُ الذِّهنُ ما لا يتغيَّرُ، مهما كان عظيمًا..! وقد نبَّهنا القرآنُ إلى هذا الميلِ البشريِّ، فقال اللهُ تعالى: ﴿وَقَلِيلٌ مِنْ عِبَادِيَ الشَّكُورُ﴾. أستذكِرُ هنا بعضًا من الأهوالِ التي عِشناها في ذروةِ حربِ غزَّة، (ما بين أكتوبر ٢٠٢٣ ومارس ٢٠٢٤)، حيثُ انقلبتِ الحياةُ رأسًا على عقبٍ، …
إنّ في القلب قسوة لا يُذيبها إلّا «ذكرُ اللهِ تعالى» .. - ابن القيم.
قال الله تعالى: ﴿وَما نُرسِلُ بِالآياتِ إِلَّا تَخويفًا﴾ قال رسول الله ﷺ: «لاَ تَقُومُ السَّاعَةُ حَتَّى يُقْبَضَ الْعِلْمُ، وَتَكْثُرَ الزَّلاَزِلُ، وَيَتَقَارَبَ الزَّمَانُ، وَتَظْهَرَ الْفِتَنُ، وَيَكْثُرَ الْهَرْجُ -وَهْوَ الْقَتْلُ الْقَتْلُ- حَتَّى يَكْثُرَ فِيكُمُ الْمَالُ فَيَفِيضُ». رواه البخاري. كلما تقدّم بنا الزمان؛ اشتدّت الحاجة لذكر الله واستذكار أحاديث آخر الزمان...
اللهُمّ انقلنا من ذلِّ معصيتك إلى عزِّ طاعتك، واجعلنا في حِصن أمنِك ولا تجعلنا عند مواقع خوفك!
الحمدُلله الذي وهبنا يومًا جديدًا من عنده، وأذِن لنا فيه بذكره، ولطف بنا فيه من فضله، ولم يُعاجلنا على سيئ أقوالنا وأفعالنا بعقوبته!
اعتاد النّاسُ أن يستدلُّوا بأول كلمةٍ نَزَلَت على سيِّدنا مُحمّد صلوات ربي وسلامه عليه ليقولوا نحنُ أُمّة «إقرأ»، غيرَ أنَّ المُفتاح ليس في هذه الكلمة مع أهميتها، بل في: «باسم ربِّك»، أي أن تقرأ باسم ربِّك، فمن قرأ بغير اسم الله، أي على غير ما يريد الله؛ فهو والجاهل سواء، وإنْ جَمَعَ العلومَ من أطرافها..!
كان الرجلُ يأتي النبيَّ صلّى الله عليه وسلّم (في جلسة واحدة) يتعلم أمر دينه؛ فيؤمن بالله، بل وينطلق إلى قومه داعياً.. ما أبسط رسالة الإسلام حينها من منبعها الصافي.. فلما تركنا المنبعَ إلى قال فُلان وقال عِلَّان؛ لو جاءك أحدهم اليوم ليُعلِّمك (عقيدتَك) لعَقَّدَك من الدِّين كُلِّه!! #عقم_منهجي
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @atharq04. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 821,564 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“النِّطَاسِيّ ے” (@atharq04), 269 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atharq04.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.