3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 200–203 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 01:09
203
+3
8 Aug 2026, 11:32
200
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:48
200
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 10 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.9%
avg views ÷ 203 subscribers
Avg views / post
52.5
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
19 (10 December 2025 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
315
Reactions total
5
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
35 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
31
88.6%
❤🔥
4
11.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 December 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
چرا devChan فراتر از یک کامیونیتی هست؟ و چالش هامون در اول مسیر چیه
امروزه دیگه این که کسی یه ماشین حساب رو کد بزنه و یه سری پروژه ساده بزنه و چند تا الگوریتم رو پیاده سازی کنه برای hr ها رزومه محسوب نمیشه!
چون همین الان Ai اینا رو میزنه ... پس چیکار باید کنیم؟
ما توی devChan اومدیم تا مشکل رزومه و کار برنامه نویسان رو هم درست کنیم، devChan یه کامیونیتی و پلتفرم هست که با فعالیت شما رزومه آنلاین و زنده براتون میسا…
پلتفرم DevChan
این روزا همهجا پر شده از پروژههایی که با چندتا پرامپت به AI ساخته شدن، بدون اینکه سازندهشون واقعاً بفهمه زیرش چی میگذره. به این نوع محتوا و پروژهها میگن slop؛ چیزی که سریع تولید شده، شبیه محصول واقعیه، ولی پشتش درک، تلاش و فکر نیست. حجمش هم هر روز بیشتر میشه؛ فیدها، گیتهاب، حتی کامیونیتیهای برنامهنویسی هم دارن پر میشن از این جنس چیزا.
DevChan دقیقاً واکنش به همینه.
یه پلتفرم و کامیونیتی که …
یه بازی بامزه که همین الان میتونید بازیش کنید...
یادتونه در مورد این اثر تعاملی گفتم؟ اثری که در مورد دنیا و تفکر رایج در عصر پسا هوش مصنوعی یا post-AI صحبت میکنه و توی هکر نیوز کلی رای گرفته بود؟
یادتونه گفتم که اثر با CLAUDE نوشته شده بود و بخش زیادی از کد هاش اصطلاحا Hard-code بودن و نمیشد ترجمش کرد؟
و یادتونه که گفتم این ترجمه نزدیک به 500 خط کد شد؟ اونم تو یه شب؟ الان تونستم دیپلویش کنم (به دلیل فیلترینگ و ند…
فاطی خودش کسی بود که اوایلی که دو سال پیش وارد کامیونیتی CS12 شد از ریاضی متنفر بود واقعا خوشحالم که الان این دوره رو مینویسه... آدم ها میتونند عاشق چیزایی بشن که یه روزی ازش بدشون میومده. و به نظرم دقیقا این حس خیلی جذابه این که یه دانشجو و دانش آموز اسبق که از ریاضی متنفر بوده خوشش میاد و شروع میکنه به خوندن و مطالعه کردن و بعد از مدتی یه دوره پرکتیکال رو مینویسه که افرادی مثل خودش یاد بگیرند ...
خوبی این دوره این…
#void #int
این محتوا هم به درد برنامهنویسها میخوره و هم غیربرنامهنویسها!
داستان از این قراره که یه کورس جبر به سبک «تِرِد» (Thread) آماده کردیم. این دوره طوری طراحی شده که اگر ریاضیات و جبر دوران دبیرستان رو درست یاد نگرفتید یا یادتون رفته، بتونید از صفر و به سادهترین شکل یادش بگیرید.
بهزودی، فکر کنم ظرف یکی دو روز آینده، این دوره رو همراه با دورههای «دیتا ساینس»، «ماشین لرنینگ» و «سیستمعامل» منتشر میکنیم…
استارت آپی که از اوایل جنگ شروع به توسعه اش کردیم، در نبود هوش مصنوعی، اینترنت و ....
کلی حرف دارم که بعدا براتون بگم ولی این هفته میاد.
https://t.me/webhablog/18
یه ایده خفن خورده به ذهنم به زودی کاری میکنم که .... زندگی بهتری داشته باشیم، و به زودی تبدیلش میکنم به یه سایت. اسمشو میزارم راهی به سوی خوشبختی
پ.ن : مامانم همین الان این اسم رو گفت، منم دامنه rbsk.ir خریدم میرم طرحشو بزنم و طرحشو میزارم اینجا، ایده سادست و البته اوایلش شاید یکم بترسونتتون یا احساس کنید که سخته همه چیز ولی کم کم اوکی میشه باور کنید❤️
@farhantbyte
راهی به سوی خوشبختی چیه؟ (با شاکینگ المنت)
راهی به سوی خوشبختی یا rbsk یه چیز زرد و چرت و پرتِ عنگیزشی نیست، یه اتفاق بامزست چند مدت پیش اوایلی که نت ها باز شد برگشتم به ردیت و مثل همیشه شروع کردم به پست زدن (طبیعتا در مورد عشق و علاقم به C) و در نهایت چی شد؟ یه گروه از بچه های علاقمند به برنامه نویسی سطح پایین رو پیدا کردم و خلاصه روانه دیسکورد شدیم و بعد از مدتی یکی از بچه ها گفت من کتاب the art of computer progra…
روز قلم را به تمام دوستان و همراهان پلتفرم وبها تبریک میگم.
امیدواریم که وبها با شما تبدیل به خانه ای همیشگی برای متخصصان قلم شود.
تیم فنی و مارکتینگ وبها
#blogging #وبلاگ_نویسی #وبلاگ_نویس #وبلاگ_نویس_ها #نویسنده #نوشتن #قلم
@webhablog
تجربه ساخت یک سرویس وبلاگ دهی
۶ یا ۷ سال پیش اولین تلاشم برای ساخت وبسایت منتهی شد به داشتن یک وبلاگ چیزی که امروز با این که دیگه ندارمش بهش افتخار میکنم.
سرویس وبلاگ دهی وبها ورژن اول خودش رو 20 روز دیگه در اختیار وبلاگ نویس ها، خبرنگار ها، ژورنالیست ها، و کاربران حرفه ای محتوا و... قرار میده، اولین سرویس وبلاگ/وبسایت دهی creator-first در ایران
سرویسی که تمام این مدت روش بودم. من یک کامپیوتر ساینتیست جونیور هستم،…
حرومزاده بودن هم لول داره مثلا لول صدا و سیما رو هر کسی نمیتونه بهش برسه...
❤7
Signed FWD
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @atfarhanwd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@atfarhanwd named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@dmagical12 named in 3 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@dmagical12gap named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Farhan WD - Code Lover🫏” (@atfarhanwd), 203 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atfarhanwd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
