Channel
@atefeh_khosrravii
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
553subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002091325270 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @atefeh_khosrravii |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/atefeh_khosrravii |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 553 | -4 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:42 | 557 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 00:22 | 558 | no change |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:47 | 558 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
41 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 41 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2025 to 7 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
صد در صد وجود داره ✅ ولی با این چیزایی که درموردش میگن و شنیدین خیلی متفاوته 👇🏻 این تیک رو بزن تا بری اکسپلور ریلزتو از اینجا آپلود کن تا کیلو کیلو فالوور جذب کنی جدیدترین مقاله اینستاگرام در مورد الگوریتم میگه: محتوایی تولید کن که مخاطب دوسش داشته باشه، روی اون وقت بذاره ( واچتایم ) و با اون تعامل کنه ( لایک، کامنت، شیر، سیو ) منم هر روز الگوریتمم رو بهبود میدم تا محتوای محبوبتر از نظر مخاطب، به افراد بیشتر…
❤10
الگوریتم وجود داره ؟
خالقترین خلاق جهان، خداست. اگه خدا از روح خودش به تو دمیده، پس قطعا نورِ خلاقیت حتی در حد یه سوی کوچیک تو وجودت هست! :) چندتا نکته برای اینکه خلاقتر باشیم: 🦋 اولین کسی که با نظرت مخالفه، میتونه مسیر خلاق بودنت رو بسازه 🦋 همه ایدهها در جهان ابتدا ناقص هستن و نیاز تکامل دارن بنابراین خودتون رو برای ایدههای اولیه، سرزنش نکنین 🦋 خلاقیت دقیقا مثل یک عضو بدنه و نیاز به ورزش داره! 🦋 خلاقیت استعداد نیست، یه مهارت
❤5
سلام عاطفه جان من فکر میکنم حتی یذره هم خلاق نیستم بنظرتون خلاقیت ذاتیه یا میشه پرورشش داد؟
دقیقاً شروع با ریل انتخاب هوشمندانهایه. فقط استوری رو هم از همون اول داشته باشین؛ چون چیزی نیست که یکدفعه توش حرفهای بشین؛ یه مهارته که فقط با انجام دادنش و بودن توی جریانش پیشرفت میکنین...
سلام وقت بخیر من تازه میخوام پیجمو بزنم بهتره اول کار تمرکزم روی ریلز باشه؟مثلا ۲۰ تا ریلز درست کنم و بعد ببینم کدومش بازخورد داره ؟ بعد کم کم برم سراغ استوری و اسلایدی؟
تو یک ماه و نیم اول 20کا شدیم. حقیقتا سالی که گذشت برای این پیجم کم کاری کردم؛ حتی نزدیک چهار ماه نه پست گذاشتم نه استوری و خب قطعا بیدلیل نبوده... اما چیزی که باعث شد تو مدت کوتاهی پیجم رشد کنه؛ ۱. محتواهام رو بر اساس دغدغه شما ساختم، نه سلیقهی شخصی خودم. ۲. قبل از شروع، زمان گذاشتم و خوب تحقیق کردم تا ببینم تو این مارکت دقیقاً چه چیزایی جاش خالیه. ۳. تو هر پست سعی کردم تا جایی که میتونم خلق ارزش کنم. (م…
❤6
میشه نقشه راه رشد صفحهی خودتونو بگین
با تمرین کردن زیاد یه مهارت کسب کنین که نیاز بازار باشه و برید تو دل کار ⚠️از رویافروشاهم دوری کنین
چطوری به درآمد برسیم ؟
نه نمیدونم، چون باید مشخص کنی چه محصولی میخوای بفروشی؛ بعد درمورد هزینه تولید یا تامین اون محصول تحقیق کنی و با توجه به تعدادی که میخوای موجود کنی؛ تخمین بزنی...
من خیلی دوست دارم آنلاین شاپ خودمو بزنم شما میدونی چقدر سرمایه میخواد؟
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @atefeh_khosrravii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“عاطفهخسروی | تولیدمحتوا” (@atefeh_khosrravii), 553 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atefeh_khosrravii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.