4 measurements spanning 18 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 270–271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 19:15
271
+1
7 Aug 2026, 16:30
270
-1
6 Aug 2026, 23:33
271
no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:00
271
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 24 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
15
78.9%
❤
2
10.5%
🖕
2
10.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2022 to 18 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟 Bot Updated!
1. Migrated to TypeScript for tighter code logic, and solved several potential bugs.
2. The download speed is significantly higher (up to 8x).
This is done by downloading several chunks in parallel and specifying the DC to download from. (theoretically it can be higher, but I think the current number of workers is more stable. You can self-host the bot and make your own adjustments)
If you noticed any…
Electron 的官方文档竟然没几个人去贡献翻译。感觉我已经见到过不少基于 Electron 的应用了(比如 Clash for Windows、阿里云盘 PC 客户端、夸克网盘 PC 客户端),但是官方文档的翻译完成度却不高
Electron 官方收录得很快,翻译的东西通常几分钟之内就能出现在文档里。但是对已经翻译过的文档的修改貌似不太及时。以前的一些文档有些机翻味(虽然我感觉我也有点),并且中英文之间竟然不加空格,读起来就有点不顺眼(
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @atabots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ATA Bots” (@atabots), 271 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atabots.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.