Channel
@asyagurzo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
215subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001175274285 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @asyagurzo |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/asyagurzo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 215 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 215 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (28 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,064 |
| Reactions total | 100 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
100 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5409186386446144182 | 28 | 28.0% | |
| custom 5404362304949081227 | 20 | 20.0% | |
| custom 5244792368548292293 | 16 | 16.0% | |
| custom 5404492012961420739 | 11 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5404560337301166136 | 11 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5244704566531858275 | 9 | 9.00% | |
| custom 5424597137126080197 | 5 | 5.00% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
прошло 2 месяца с тех пор, как я завела алоказию. её никто не хотел брать на маркете, потому что она была ну очень крохотная. с тех пор алоказия увеличилась в 5 раз и сегодня захватила новый, уже третий по счёту горшок. что будет через полгода? она меня выселит из дома?
custom 52447923685482922933
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52447923685482922936custom 54043623049490812273
так здорово сегодня прокатилась на велосипеде по перекрытым улицам, спасибо какому-то внезапному велопробегу!
custom 54044920129614207396
ТРЕК ВЫШЕЛ!!!! 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 by Pebble Слушать: https://vhqmusic.band.link/8xUvN
custom 54091863864461441827
смарите у кого трек вышел.... а чей продакшн? а мой! поздравляем Марфу с релизоооооом!!!
custom 52447923685482922936
будьте осторожны
custom 54091863864461441827
⚡друзья, официально приглашаю всех на мой сольный концерт в москве! большая программа, полный звук, эксклюзивные невышедшие песни. на концерте также будет мерч — клевые футболки с вышивкой. если слушаете мою музыку или просто хотите поддержать, прийти на концерт — самый лучший способ. места пока есть, а мерча осталось очень мало. 18 августа, 20:00 16 тонн арбат билеты — https://afisha.yandex.ru/moscow/concert/mi…
custom 54091863864461441825custom 54043623049490812273custom 54045603373011661362
приходите на офигенный концерт моего прекрасного друга!! люблю Вовины песни бесконечно
custom 54091863864461441824custom 52447923685482922931custom 54045603373011661361
плохие новости: - мне некогда работать
custom 54044920129614207395custom 54245971371260801972
хорошие новости: - я перевела три рекомендательных письма (писала о том, какая я exceptional, теперь жду подписей людей, которые поверят и подтвердят этот факт) - вчера у меня был первый урок с преподавателем по английскому. я прошла mock test ielts на 7.5 и 7 по reading и listening. а вот отзыв на speaking у меня пока такой:
custom 54045603373011661368custom 54245971371260801973custom 52447045665318582751
меня в этом году не взяли ни на один музыкальный фестиваль и ни на одну резиденцию, не позвали спикером ни на одну лекцию, но я почему-то считаю, что какой-то охрененный иностранный вуз посмотрит на меня, восхитится, заберёт к себе, еще и докинет денег на обучение. только демотивирующие посты на этой неделе
custom 540436230494908122714
спасибо, что заблокировали четвертый мессенджер, в котором я общалась с семьей, и оставили только те, где никто не получает уведомления. да в целом какая разница, мобильного интернета-то тоже особо нет. связь.
custom 52447045665318582758
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @asyagurzo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 900,786 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ася Гурзо secret club” (@asyagurzo), 215 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asyagurzo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.