Ура! 55 тыс подписчиков!
🔥6

Channel
@asya_headhunter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
290subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001478817529 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @asya_headhunter |
| Description | О карьере и мотивации для всех Автор: @asyakabarga |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/asya_headhunter |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 290 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 290 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 February 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 561 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
181 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 66 | 36.5% | |
| 🔥 | 41 | 22.7% | |
| 🤯 | 28 | 15.5% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 9.94% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 8.29% | |
| 💯 | 13 | 7.18% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ура! 55 тыс подписчиков!
🔥6
На злобу дня просто)
😁5❤3
Как выглядят будни безработных людей 💀
😁11
Вообще я пришла с вами поделиться большой новостью — в понедельник выхожу на новую работу. Причем сама я ее не искала, храни боже навык продавать себя и свои умения абсолютно всегда и везде. Думаю записать про это видео, поэтому что искренне считаю, что это сейчас мой самый сильный скилл. Работа, кстати, не связана с HR. Для меня это шаг в сторону, но туда, где мне дичайше интересно и куда тянет с неимоверной сило…
❤11👏5🤯1
Поделюсь маленьким оффтопом: я довольно активно веду телеграм-канал. Но вот только не этот) 🤩 У меня есть другие каналы, которые живые, активные, и там я просто ловлю отдушину и веду их просто в кайф что-то навроде личного дневника, но по определенной теме. 🤩 Что-то мне кажется, что пора и этот уголок превращать в зону свободного полета мысли, потому что ну вот такой формат, как посты выше, совсем мне не идет. Я лю…
❤3🔥2👏1
Иногда меня спрашивают: к кому ты сама идёшь, когда нужно принять сложное решение? Ответ — к своей наставнице. Она для меня не просто коллега. Она опора и наставник. Тот человек, к которому я прихожу с вопросами, когда внутри хаос и сложно отделить тревогу от стратегии. Недавно мы почти час обсуждали мою ситуацию: выходить ли снова в найм или продолжать полностью фокусироваться на своих проектах. Формально это мой …
🔥12
Сегодня провела вебинар про фриланс в рекрутинге. И если честно, в какой-то момент поймала себя на мысли, что вся тема сильно проще, чем кажется. У большинства выходит криво потому, что нет системы. И из-за этого весь фриланс скатывается в хаотичные попытки "сделать хоть что-то". Фриланс так не работает. Это не разовая попытка, а регулярный, часто муторный и неинтересный процесс. Но без регулярности он просто не бу…
🔥5
Залететь в последний вагон на вебинар про выход на фриланс
Video message, posted without a caption
👏3🔥3
У нас сегодня важное событие — День Рождения нашего управляющего директора, Василисы 🥳 Если вы хоть раз заходила на наш сайт, знайте — он такой большой и функциональный благодаря ей. Личные кабинеты — благодаря ей. Рассылки, контент, и удобная оплата — благодаря ей. Выверенные программы и вебинары — благодаря ей. И даже этот тг-канал — благодаря ей 🥰 У Василисы было одно желание — добить этот канал до 1000 участни…
❤5
Столько сомнений и страхов на тему выхода на фриланс, а по факту все просто. Приходите к нам, расскажу про свой опыт и поделюсь первыми простыми шагами, которые помогут вам разобраться надо ли вам оно или нет, и с чего вообще начать)
❤7
у нас тут с ребятами новый веб на весьма насущную тему — фриланс в рекрутинге. Если у вас давно зреет мысль, что пора бы выйти в свободный полет, но есть куча страхов, ограничений и сомнений — вам сюда надо
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @asya_headhunter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 828,785 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Асьворкинг” (@asya_headhunter), 290 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asya_headhunter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.