Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Asya_Chaus

Channel

Asya_Chaus

@asya_chaus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

2,211subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001681927755
TypeChannel
Username@asya_chaus
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/asya_chaus

Growth

2,2072,2182,212.57 August 2026 — 2,218 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,218 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,215 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,210 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,207 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,209 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,213 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,211 subscribers2,2117 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 19 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,205–2,220 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 03:552,211-2
24 Aug 2026, 04:372,213+4
20 Aug 2026, 08:542,209+2
17 Aug 2026, 17:272,207-3
14 Aug 2026, 05:142,210-5
11 Aug 2026, 01:482,215-3
7 Aug 2026, 17:322,218no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:242,218first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.1%
avg views ÷ 2,211 subscribers
Avg views / post
533
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held7 (20 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,600
Reactions total106
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 24s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

386 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12632.6%
🔥8622.3%
👍8421.8%
🤣7018.1%
❤‍🔥82.07%
🥰71.81%
👏41.04%
🍾10.259%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 386reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC436 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

За что еще люблю магазин ЮМИ 🩷Гели для душа Уже не первый год беру только их. Банку с помпой взяла единожды, беру запаски, меняю запахи. Сильно пахнет мылом🫧 не знаю как объяснить, но сразу понимаешь «что-то японческое» Мужской с охлаждающим эффектом🧊 🩷Ватные диски и ушные палочки Maneki Ван лав. Диски не лезут, плотные, но не колючие. Нет ощущения, что ты Протер лицо стекловатой с остатками оной на коже. Палки пл

22🔥7❤‍🔥2🥰1

Signed A A

4 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC444 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Экскурсией назвать сложно😂 Забежали/убежали 😅 Реально очень крутые дезодоранты от фирмы LION Мужской с цитрусовым запахом, женский фруктово-цветочный. Пару минут есть ощущение, что запах спиртовой. Держат великолепно, оттестили с подругой и на мужчинах в том числе. Цена приятная. Кажется, что он сильно жидкий, но высыхает моментально, ходить и играть в «уточку кря-кря» не прийдется🫶🏽 Уверена, что есть и на ОЗ

22🔥6🥰1

Signed A A

31 Jul 2026, 03:20 UTC720 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

31🤣8🥰4❤‍🔥2

Signed A A

29 Jul 2026, 12:08 UTC783 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня Шакира чуть подустала😂 Женский чатик 🥰💔

🤣55🔥43

Signed A A

29 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC764 views98 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вчера у нас случилась вечеринка по случаю дня рождения Юли Крупа 🥰 Юля у нас королева праздников. Если отмечает, то всегда весело, сыто-пьяно, с танцами до упаду 😅 В 2023г мы с ней «купили» мне костюм Cult Gaia (понятно, я надеюсь, что купила я, а Юля подобрала и одобрила). И я его вчера надела впервые. Я не знаю, как это объяснить, но я в нем чувствовала себя «как голая» и мне было не очень комфортно. И плюс не м

🔥6825❤‍🔥4🥰1

Signed A A

23 Jul 2026, 04:20 UTC≈1,030 views76 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Все что было ДО пустота белый шум😂 Как енот - полоскун со стажем заявляю, что я отказываюсь от японских FAFA в пользу тайцев 😅 Знал бы Луи Вюттон, чем я планирую пахнуть не выходил бы из России. Средство концентрированное и безумно приятный аромат (каждому свой разумеется, для этого есть тестеры) Ей богу, я как парфюм выбирала. Брала до этого на Озон, 100сп, а нашла в Тайской Лавке, там куча всяких разных. Отмеч

👍5013🤣7👏4🍾1🔥1

Signed A A

20 Jul 2026, 03:25 UTC≈1,100 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мешок для стирки кроссовок Или вводите в строку поиска 👌 Пена для очищения обуви: GRASS - мне очень нравится, но в последний раз была какая-то неприятная стоимость🫠 SIMPLE LINE - ничуть не хуже, но бюджетнее Кроссовки я сначала смачиваю водой, запшикиваю, даю постоять. Особо чумазые места могу зачистить старой зубной щеткой. Далее закидываю в мешок и стиралку на деликатную стирку🧺💦

👍3410

Signed A A

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @asya_chaus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Asya_Chaus” (@asya_chaus), 2,211 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asya_chaus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.