Channel
@astro_boom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
501subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001282429035 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @astro_boom |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/astro_boom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 501 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 503 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 503 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 6 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
37 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 23 | 62.2% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 10.8% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 8.11% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 5.41% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 5.41% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.70% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.70% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 2.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 21 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @astro_boom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 April 2026 to 21 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я уже столько информации перечитала про антидепрессанты… аж сердце разрывается, почему столько людей пьют их бездумно, потом выйти не могут… их уже назначают даже для профилактики! 😨 Но вот эта инфа про бесплодие просто 💔 Глобалисткая машина работает полным ходом 😭😭
Signed Ирина Сердюк 💠
В России в течение нескольких лет растет число впервые поставленных диагнозов «бесплодие». Одну из причин видят в антидепрессантах По последним открытым данным Росстата, за 2024 год его выявили у 245,8 тыс. женщин (+5,5% к 2020-му) и у 32,7 тыс. мужчин (+6,9%). Часто встречается сочетанное бесплодие, то есть в паре проблемы находят и у мужчины, и у женщины, сообщили репродуктологи. Одной из причин снижения фертильно…
Signed Ирина Сердюк 💠
Стояла дилемма: выступать на олимпиаде или отмечать юбилей любимого 🤪🥰 Он сказал, что хочет чтобы я ни в чем себя не ограничивала, и с удовольствием будет поддерживать меня на турнире в этот день. И звезды повернулись к нам, чтобы мы убили двух зайцев)) За несколько дней до турнира я узнала, что выступать буду вечером. У нас был целый день на праздник! Я придумала квест с заданиями на полдня, ушла из дома рано утро…
🔥3🥰3⚡2👏1🙏1
Signed Ирина Сердюк 💠
Неделю выступала на Всемирной танцевальной олимпиаде в Москве. Это такой кааайф!!! Просто не передать… Такой масштаб! 58000 участников! Благодарю Вселенную за такой шикарный опыт, за возможности, за классных людей рядом, тренера, семью и одноклубниц за поддержку, свое тело за послушность, я очень счастлива ❤️ Желаю каждому найти такое хобби по душе, которое будет вдохновлять вас на подвиги и скреплять ваши семьи 🤗🙏 …
🔥7🎉4
Signed Ирина Сердюк 💠
Я обожаю работать с МАК-картами — это неотъемлемая часть моих трансформационных кругов и ретритов. И я прекрасно знаю, как вы любите, когда я достаю для вас карту. И сегодня — тот самый день ☕️🌿 Мы не всегда бываем в ресурсе. Почему? Потому что нас тянет назад какая-то — часто невидимая программа. И вот что важно: именно в нашей тени кроется огромная сила. Теневая сторона прячет ресурсы, заставляя тратить уйму энер…
🔥5
Signed Ирина Сердюк 💠
⏰ АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ АНОНСЫ: 🌿🌿🌿МАЙ ❣️ 06.05-12.05 - еду в Москву на турнир. Кто хочет встретиться, пообщаться, пишите, организую встречу в кафе из желающих ❣️ 15.05 (пт) 18:00 - звездный круг (астро-нетворкинг) в кафе (Ростов) ❣️ 18.05 (пн) 11:00 - церемония рапэ, 12:00-16:00 телесная сессия ПФР (Ростов) ❣️ 19.05 (вт) 11:00-16:00 - трансформационный круг с церемониями (Ростов) ❣️23-25.05 - рабочая поездка в Москву, напиш…
❤2
Signed Ирина Сердюк 💠
На днях проводила одну из самых сильных практик ПФР (психо-функциональная разблокировка) для 15 прекрасных женщин. Случились мощные проживания🔥 Всего 3 сеанса, и то, от чего люди годами не могут освободиться, остается в прошлом навсегда. Офлайн в Ростове-на-Дону или онлайн по всему миру. Набираю группу онлайн @boom_astro
🔥2👍1
Signed Ирина Сердюк 💠
На 1 курсе я подружилась с парнем, который триггерил меня своей свободой, нестандартным мышлением и спонтанностью принятия решений. Он мог за час принять решение поехать на море или в Пятигорск, купить билеты и умчать туда кататься на велике. Я не могла позволить себе такую роскошь - зависела от семьи и в целом была такая пай-девочка)) Мы много путешествовали с родителями, но все поездки были заранее планируемые. Вы…
🔥6
Signed Ирина Сердюк 💠
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @astro_boom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 119,312 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Загадки отношений с Ириной Сердюк” (@astro_boom), 501 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astro_boom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.