Channel
@astraxoff
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
29subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002387662941 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @astraxoff |
| Description | Благодарку можно на крипту ( @grencars ) |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 27 January 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/astraxoff |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 29 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 29 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 27 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2025 to 12 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 2 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 2 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
В виде благодарности - ещё не придумал, но можно бабками
https://t.me/otc_easymarket https://t.me/OTC37 https://t.me/blockchain_OTC https://t.me/terncrypto_otc https://t.me/otcp2pnft https://t.me/RisingStarOTC https://t.me/otcship https://t.me/ProfitOTC https://t.me/otcmarket_gotham https://t.me/otc_youngapp https://t.me/otc_cryptonft https://t.me/one_top_otc https://t.me/OTCBlack_Market https://t.me/cake_otc_market https://t.me/otc_market_nft_crypto https://t.me/chat_nft …
https://t.me/poseidon_otc https://t.me/Mediaotc https://t.me/plus4accountbar https://t.me/otcship https://t.me/mudrevskiy_otc https://t.me/MarketICOBOG https://t.me/doubletop_otc https://t.me/OTC_DragonMarket https://t.me/otc_youngapp https://t.me/TVS_OTC https://t.me/OTCmarketByChain https://t.me/otc_service_ban https://t.me/nftotc https://t.me/terncrypto_otc https://t.me/otc_wl_chat https://t.me/OTCtrust1 https://t…
❤1
https://t.me/countryverefi https://t.me/sellbuycoins https://t.me/DETROIT_VERIIIIIF https://t.me/switcoin21 https://t.me/verefikaciy1 https://t.me/ganster6101 https://t.me/schemes_no_scam https://t.me/income_tg https://t.me/birzha_verifikaciya_akkauntov https://t.me/otcverifs https://t.me/noscams_and_idiots https://t.me/bitcoin2434 https://t.me/louisverifity https://t.me/worktopua https://t.me/veriff_yanko https://t.…
https://t.me/ice_veriff https://t.me/otc_doubietop https://t.me/darkbuhta https://t.me/btchkmeetup https://t.me/verifyaccountcoin https://t.me/otciceminty https://t.me/otcgrizzly https://t.me/nashenskiy_verif https://t.me/otc_marketcrypto https://t.me/vereficcations https://t.me/goatmenfamily https://t.me/toptrustchat_otc https://t.me/bettingmarkeet https://t.me/stalkerverif https://t.me/burmalde_verif https://t.me/m…
https://t.me/SweatCoin_OTC https://t.me/ferifoxf https://t.me/topclab_otc https://t.me/MagicEden_OTC https://t.me/otc_ocee https://t.me/redappleotc1 https://t.me/worldwide_otc https://t.me/otc_premium https://t.me/cake_otc_market https://t.me/CryptCotOTC https://t.me/terncrypto_otc https://t.me/web_investors https://t.me/otc_marketgucci https://t.me/arbitraj_daddyaff https://t.me/doubletop_otc https://t.me/boOm_Zyc h…
File, posted without a caption
https://t.me/otc_verification
https://t.me/mediasocialmarket https://t.me/tadubu1992 https://t.me/workcommunitys https://t.me/p2pverif https://t.me/verificationbyskorm https://t.me/cremindsverif https://t.me/pops_2222 https://t.me/Verificationformoneyua https://t.me/nashenskiy_verif https://t.me/honeyverefCHA https://t.me/Legit_buyer_investor https://t.me/kyckycchat https://t.me/ukraineverificationteam https://t.me/verify|forlmr_bin_777 https://t…
https://t.me/hao123go https://t.me/usdt_king https://t.me/plus4accountbar https://t.me/swoptoky_exchange https://t.me/otc_market_eu_ru https://t.me/nftmarkettotc https://t.me/cryptomasonlofficialotc https://t.me/otc_market_europe https://t.me/buyacclegit https://t.me/otc_premium https://t.me/otc_is_free https://t.me/OTC37 https://t.me/terncrypto_otc https://t.me/otcp2pnf https://t.me/RisingStarOTC https://t.me/otcshi…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @astraxoff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 617,400 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@astraxoff named 102 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
52 more handles are in this same list but not shown individually here — capped at 50.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ASTRAX - Official Channel” (@astraxoff), 29 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astraxoff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.