Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for любовь, аутентика и брови // LAB by @astalabrovista 🤍

Channel

любовь, аутентика и брови // LAB by @astalabrovista 🤍

@astalabrovistaishere

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

66subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002058478496
TypeChannel
Username@astalabrovistaishere
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/astalabrovistaishere

Growth

636664.57 August 2026 — 63 subscribers10 August 2026 — 63 subscribers29 August 2026 — 65 subscribers16 September 2026 — 66 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 40 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63–66 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 21:4066+1
29 Aug 2026, 00:4365+2
10 Aug 2026, 03:4563no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:5963first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

57 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53327329062656597341933.3%
custom 53485372090939041911831.6%
custom 53303175755721788961017.5%
custom 54337728623076016221017.5%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC20 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53303175755721788963custom 53485372090939041913custom 53327329062656597342

8 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC31 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

как уместить эту красоту в один пост? 🥹🥹🥹

custom 54337728623076016225custom 53303175755721788961custom 53327329062656597341

8 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC31 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53485372090939041915custom 53327329062656597342

8 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC33 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Мне кажется, второй раз за полгода в 9 утра я уже работаю 🤍 Хороший опыт 💔 поработал с утра – и продуктивным себя ощущаешь, и на свои дела остается добрая половина дня 😎

custom 53327329062656597344

7 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC35 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

четыре часа в статике на ногах настроение: печь пироги с яблоками или ягодами 😂 всю усталость перекрываете вы, дорогие мои девочки, приходите, дарите свои улыбки, цветы приносите Ульяна, если ты это читаешь, еще раз огромное тебе спасибо 💔💔💔 я в восторге!

custom 53327329062656597344

5 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC41 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

❤️‍🩹 сегодня тут будет пост приятного удивления медициной по ОМС так как бÓльшая часть моей аудитории – прекрасные девочки (в том числе из одного ЖК), думаю, что почитать будет актуально, ведь речь пойдет о поликлинике №117 на Толубеевском, где есть всё! вдохновившись историей Насти, подумала, почему бы мне тоже не воспользоваться возможностью, и записалась в женскую консультацию (а что, зря я налоги плачу что ли?)

custom 53485372090939041915

4 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC43 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

lash routine 🐚 мне кажется, ламинирование ресниц – лучшее решения для лета (и не только) – просыпаешься с уже красивым взглядом (я говорю freeeeshhh) – забываешь про тушь и переживания, что она может потечь от жары и осыпаться – подкрученные ресницы выглядят длиннее, темнее, объемнее – сокращаешь время утренних сборов – выглядишь роскошно 24/7 а результат держится от 6 недель и даже дольше! обсуждали сегодня, что

custom 53485372090939041915custom 54337728623076016222

4 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC41 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

меня сегодня безумно вдохновили эти глаза 💔💔💔

custom 53303175755721788965custom 54337728623076016223custom 53327329062656597342

3 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC43 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Такие мелочи очень подпитывают ресурс, кстати 💔 И такие красивые завтраки для себя тоже. Я тут увидела у своей Анечки оранжевую тему для телеграмма, забрала себе. Еще у меня оранжевая щетка, паста с оранжевыми буквами (тут просто совпало 😁) и бутылка гидрофилки тоже оранжевая 🍑 Дофаминовые пятна в нашей жизни всегда уместны 🐈

custom 53303175755721788961custom 53327329062656597341

3 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC39 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Обожаю крабики. Мне важно, чтобы они были красивыми 💅🏻 Этот брала тут ❤️

custom 53327329062656597343

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @astalabrovistaishere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“любовь, аутентика и брови // LAB by @astalabrovista 🤍” (@astalabrovistaishere), 66 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astalabrovistaishere.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.