![Telegram profile photo for [ МШ Ассоциации ] cf](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/62/62e67782b9df68cd21ea7a10bb9dc03e918a9dd852a63fa7085511683fbc7346.jpg)
Channel
@associationssscf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004311499439 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @associationssscf |
| Description | КФ с ассоциациями по МШ |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 8 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/associationssscf |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 19 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (8 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 407 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5190588871955490767 | 1 | 33.3% | |
| custom 5190800141396779672 | 1 | 33.3% | |
| custom 5192901806333666727 | 1 | 33.3% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
𝒟оҕᴘоrо вᴘᴇмᴇни сʏток ! 𝘇Zz ° 🫂 𝟢꯭𝟣 ⁺ 、📡 𓂃 ᱙᱙ 𝒦ᴀᴩᴏчᴇ ϶ᴛᴏ ʍᴏй ᴋᴀнᴀᴧ я ᴛуᴛ буду ; ᴨᴏᴄᴛиᴛь ʙᴄяᴋᴏᴇ ᴩᴀɜнᴏᴇ , буду ᴄᴛᴩиʍиᴛь ᴛуᴛ жᴇ инᴏᴦдᴀ , дᴇᴧиᴛьᴄя нᴏʙᴏᴄᴛяʍи , ну и ᴋᴏнᴇчнᴏ чᴛᴏ жᴇ ᴧᴏᴩᴏʍ нᴀɯᴇᴦᴏ 𝐑𝐨𝐟𝐥𝐒𝐡𝐢𝐞𝐥𝐝 !! ୨ৎ 🛸 つく 、 🌲 zZz 𓂃 ¡
Signed ВиселицаНадаOWS™
#вп
Signed ВиселицаНадаOWS™
#админтейк #аудио #Веназар 🤩 ⲀⲤⲤⲞЦⳘⲀЦⳘЯ 🤩 ✅ “Клянусь, это Веник. Особенно его речь на Shield Awards в этом году” ❎ Неанон ВиселицаНада 🐈: Дайте тейков pls guysss, а то админ ебанётся скоро. Какие нахуй МЛП? С какими песнями ассоцируется у вас Веназар? Обсудить данный вопрос можно в комментариях, либо продолжить обсуждение в форме тейка♥️ТЕЙК 🐈: P.s также теперь своё мнение можно выражать молчаливо с помощью реакц
custom 51905888719554907671custom 51908001413967796721
Signed ВиселицаНадаOWS™
#вп
Signed ВиселицаНадаOWS™
💥 ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🤓 📜📜📜📜📜📜📜📜📜📜📜 〽️〽️〽️〽️〽️〽️〽️〽️〽️〽️〽️ 〽️Здравствуй мимо проходящий путник! Приветствуем тебя в Конфешен по одному из самых иных и милый пейрингов!🐾 ⭐️Блин, я нарисовал таких милых душекби. 🌟У меня есть интересный хэдканон на них. Желаете поделится контентом по этим очаровашкам? Тогда тебе к нам! ✅✅✅: База+Хейтеры душекби. 🟡🖋🖋🖋🖋🖋🖋🖋🖋🖋🟡 Вп ; адм ; бот - @DushecBBot Хэштеги #Тейк #ВП #АдминПост #Эди…
custom 51929018063336667271
Signed ВиселицаНадаOWS™
#админтейк #аудио #Руник 🤩 ⲀⲤⲤⲞЦⳘⲀЦⳘЯ 🤩 ✅ “С самого начала, когда мне удалось лицезреть Руника впервые, только эта песня в голову и приходит. Настроение песни и характер Руника схожи. Оч сильно ассоциируется с ней” ❎ Неанон ВиселицаНада 🐈: Каких по-вашему мнению вайбы песен имеет Руник? Обсудить данный вопрос можно в комментариях, либо продолжить обсуждение в форме тейка♥️ТЕЙК
Signed ВиселицаНадаOWS™
#админтейк #пикча #Гельмо 🤩 ⲀⲤⲤⲞЦⳘⲀЦⳘЯ 🤩 ✅ “Если апельсин - это Руник, то мандарин - это Гельмо🌼 Вроде мягкий, вкусненький, добренький такой. А вроде может быть и кислым, и страну чью-то продать... Но основная ассоциация, наверное, всё же из-за цвета” ❎ Неанон ВиселицаНада 🐈: Какого по-вашему мнению вайбы фрукта имеет Гельмо? Обсудить данный вопрос можно в комментариях, либо продолжить обсуждение в форме тейка♥️Т
Signed ВиселицаНадаOWS™
#админтейк #пикча #Санчез 🤩 ⲀⲤⲤⲞЦⳘⲀЦⳘЯ 🤩 ✅ “Британская короткошёрстная кошка. Звучит понтово? Эти кошки очень красивы, грациозны и привлекательные. А ещё наглые и моментами ленивые. Отрицать красоту внешнего вида нельзя, но красоту внутреннего мира признать самой лучшей можно с трудом.” ❎ Неанон ВиселицаНада 🐈: Какого по-вашему мнению вайбы кота присутствуют у Санчеза? Обсудить данный вопрос можно в комментариях,…
#админтейк #пикча #Джаст 🤩 ⲀⲤⲤⲞЦⳘⲀЦⳘЯ 🤩 ✅ “Обычный серый дворовой кот в деревне. Его взяли в дом, но дома он проводит только удобное для себя время - в другое он кайфует на улице. Хозяева часто спорят какой породы их же кот, но это навечно останется загадкой - сущность Джаста тоже довольно загадочна. Кличку этому коту в семье давали дети, потому она кажется странной. Дворняшка ненавидит воду... Речь не про кота.” ❎…
#тейк #соо #БЛС 🤩 ⲀⲤⲤⲞЦⳘⲀЦⳘЯ 🤩 ✅ “Хало, всегда BLS ассоциируется с песнями NoizeMC. Особенно с "Утрой дестрой".” ❎ Анон 🐈: Какие по-вашему мнению вайбы песен NoizeMC присутствуют у БЛС'а? Обсудить данный вопрос можно в комментариях, либо продолжить обсуждение в форме тейка♥️ТЕЙК
#админтейк #пикча #СирПилигрим 🤩 ⲀⲤⲤⲞЦⳘⲀЦⳘЯ 🤩 ✅ “С недавнего времени у меня довольно сильная ассоциация Пилигрима с пиратами. По большей части из-за превью по ролику Криэйта - с отсылкой на капитана Джека Воробья. А после мне бросились в глаза детали: у Пили отсутствует один глаз - как часто скрыт один глаз у пиратов; у руки есть неестественное покрытие - как импланты/крюк у пиратов.” ❎ Неанон ВиселицаНада 🐈: Как…
#админтейк #пикча #Алфёдов #Альцест #БЛС #Клайд #Альцест_Алфёдов #БЛС_Клайд 🤩 ⲀⲤⲤⲞЦⳘⲀЦⳘЯ 🤩 ✅ “Биби был создан Пином, а Алфёдов ожил благодаря Альцесту. Также они люто по вайбам напоминают Биби и Пина из первых серий, где Пин проста любящий батька. Пин может ругать Биби, но по голове никогда не даст. Дядя Альцест, по отношению к Алфёдову, точно также :3 Ёжик и Крош - лучшие друзья. Один более менее спокойный, а у вт…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @associationssscf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 696,003 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[ МШ Ассоциации ] cf” (@associationssscf), 19 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/associationssscf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.