File, posted without a caption

Channel
CryptodevPro
@associationbackup
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
62subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001991803202 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @associationbackup |
| Description | Get all your Latest on Airdrop and Crypto Trends |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/associationbackup |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 62 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 62 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 33
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 15
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
99 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 45.5% | |
| 🥰 | 21 | 21.2% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 15.2% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 12.1% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 6.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2026 to 25 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
I will be diving down on an important project that I believe will be the next big thing when the bull run comes. Polybot: A Simpler Way to Trade Faster in Crypto Most people think trading is just about buying low and selling high. But in crypto, speed quietly changes everything. By the time you notice a new token or react to a price move, someone else has already taken position. That gap between seeing an opport…
The market today has really been encouraging and I think I'll be going back to trading. There’s a reason most people lose interest in trading. Not because they don’t understand markets, but because the system feels stacked against them. Too many moving parts, too many ways to get it wrong. @Trylimitless strips that pressure away. You’re not juggling entries, exits, or leverage. You’re simply taking a stance on wha…
There’s a quiet shift happening in crypto. People are starting to care less about complex tools and more about clarity. Most platforms still assume users want more features, when in reality, they just want things to make sense. @Trylimitless leans into that simplicity. It strips trading down to its core, a decision. You’re not managing positions or worrying about sudden wipeouts. You’re simply choosing an outcome a…
Most people think trading is about being right. Reading charts, timing entries, chasing perfect setups… but even then, it still feels uncertain. @Trylimitless shifts that mindset completely. Instead of trying to predict price movements with precision, you’re simply taking a position on an outcome. A clear yes or no. No complex strategies, no hidden risks, just a defined bet with a known result. That simplicity cha…
Another day to talk about what @trylimitless is building in the space and it's impact overall Most people avoid trading not because they don’t want to, but because it feels too complex. Charts, leverage, liquidations… it quickly becomes overwhelming, especially for newcomers trying to understand where to even start. Limitless takes a different approach. Instead of forcing users to master technical analysis, it re…
Good morning, it's another day to preach about @multiplifi RWAs just got better with $Multiplifi Campaign live on @TonsoAIBot Do well to check them out
🔓 Tonso AI Just Became the First Trustless InfoFi Hub on Telegram Yesterday @tonso_ai dropped a massive upgrade: partnership with @cysic_xyz. Now every piece of mindshare, Buzz, Quality and Integrity metric is backed by zero-knowledge proofs — provably correct, without exposing your data or their algorithms. This changes the entire game in 2026. Attention is no longer “trust me bro”. It’s mathematically verifiabl…
🔥2
Sustainable platforms are rarely the loudest. They are the most aligned. @Vault777casino is demonstrating how aligned incentives can shape ecosystem growth without excessive promotion. Rewards are tied to usage, not volume. Contribution is recognized through impact, not visibility. This creates a feedback loop where committed users strengthen the system simply by participating. As participation deepens, liquidity …
❤2
In decentralized finance, momentum often masks fragility. When conditions shift, only systems with internal discipline remain intact. @solstice_tg approaches deployment through calibrated exposure rather than reactive positioning. Capital allocation appears structured around liquidity depth and volatility signals, not narrative cycles. Longevity in DeFi belongs to frameworks designed for stress, not just growth. …
👍2
I've been exploring the tech behind @Getyieldfi and here's what I found out YieldFi V3 feels designed for changing markets, not just favorable ones. Stablecoin yield shifts as liquidity moves and incentives rotate across chains. Instead of forcing users to react manually, V3 adapts allocations automatically. The Openeden campaign benefits from this flexibility because capital can be repositioned toward stronger-p…
❤2👏1
Good morning @vault777Casino campaign will be ending tomorrow, it has been an interesting run of events so far The season 2 will begin immediately, so do well not to fade Vault is demonstrating how aligned incentives can shape ecosystem growth without excessive promotion. Rewards are tied to usage, not volume. Contribution is recognized through impact, not visibility. This creates a feedback loop where committed u…
🔥6❤5👏4👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @associationbackup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 914,223 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@associationbackup named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 4 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptodevPro” (@associationbackup), 62 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/associationbackup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.