Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

аспис

@aspisli

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

946subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001748699762
TypeChannel
Username@aspisli
DescriptionОт печального инди до мрачной альтернативы… Слушать: https://band.link/uB5Zz
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/aspisli

Growth

9468 Aug 2026, 09:35 — 946 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:45 — 946 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:358 Aug 2026, 09:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 945–947 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:45946no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:35946first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.6%
avg views ÷ 946 subscribers
Avg views / post
394
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
20.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held6 (16 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,181
Reactions total244
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
268
Videos
36
Links
40

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 37s
Average length
1m 37s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

477 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 533266384319153305127257.0%
custom 541792835429048423511323.7%
custom 52917640120930318679219.3%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 477reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
102
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 6 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aspisli. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC216 views79 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤍Наконец дошли ручки поделиться фотками с прошедшего канцика в спб 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Кажется, что это была лучшая площадка, на которой нам доводилось выступать 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 За фото благодарим: @chesnokasss

custom 533266384319153305145custom 541792835429048423518custom 529176401209303186716

26 Jul 2026, 12:53 UTC441 views82 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤍Уже через несколько часов! Не забываем покупать билеты (ссыль на постах выше), потому что на входе они будут дороже!!!

custom 541792835429048423539custom 533266384319153305126custom 529176401209303186717

23 Jul 2026, 19:37 UTC524 views83 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤍Парочка дней осталась до нашего концертика в СПБ! Не забывайте покупать билетики! 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Кстати 2/5 группы аспис только вчера вернулись из Шанхая. Отдыхали перед выступлением и скорой записью нового музла

custom 533266384319153305152custom 541792835429048423518custom 529176401209303186713

4 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC968 views67 reactions100 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✨ГРУППА АСПИС ЕДЕТ В ПИТЕР, ПОЭТОМУ ДЕРЖИТЕ АНОНС! Поиграли в Москве, и теперь впервые едем с концертом в Питер ✨Вместе с нами выступят: fetters in use эхополей юдмунд Очень рекомендуем послушать наших друзей! 🥩Начало в 19:00 🥩Где: Клуб «Цоколь» Лиговский пр., 50 корпус 3 🤩За билетами тыкать сюда 🤩

custom 533266384319153305145custom 529176401209303186712custom 541792835429048423510

27 Jun 2026, 15:34 UTC967 views82 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

✝️Фрагмент новой песни, которую сыграли на прошедшем канцике в Москве 21 июня. Звук не очень хороший, но общий смысл понятен

custom 533266384319153305152custom 529176401209303186717custom 541792835429048423513

16 Jun 2026, 16:16 UTC≈1,410 views84 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Аайййоооууу! Уже в это воскресение играем в Москве в клубе «Клуб» 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ✨Вход свободный✨ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Наш выход примерно в 19:30, но советуем придти заранее

custom 533266384319153305152custom 529176401209303186717custom 541792835429048423515

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @aspisli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 602,869 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“аспис” (@aspisli), 946 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aspisli.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.