Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Aspecs in space

@aspecs_together

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

83subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002322806313
TypeChannel
Username@aspecs_together
DescriptionКанал для знакомств на а-спектре (эйс-, аро-, ароэйс-, апл- итп) original image from @sirompp on Tumblr
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 14 November 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/aspecs_together

Growth

839 Aug 2026, 03:30 — 83 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 17:32 — 83 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 03:309 Aug 2026, 17:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 82–84 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 17:3283no change
9 Aug 2026, 03:3083first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 14 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
22
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

124 reactions across 13 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3326.6%
custom 54201757474677167051915.3%
1612.9%
❤‍🔥118.87%
🍓108.06%
custom 542046906796423058986.45%
86.45%
💋64.84%
🎃54.03%
👍43.23%
🔥21.61%
👻10.806%
💘10.806%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 November 2024 to 22 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 May 2025, 12:40 UTC144 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Если кто вдруг хочет, могу отдать канал в хорошие руки

8 Jan 2025, 17:08 UTC280 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🏳️‍🌈: Привет! Скажите, пожалуйста, в чём выражается аплатоничность? Аплотиничным не одиноко, когда у них совсем нет друзей/подруг, соживущих, регулярно общающихся с ними? Они просто не испытывают плат. симпатии или же вообще не могут нуждаться в ком-то значимой/м, помимо себя? Спасибо! ➿➿➿➿➿ #тейк_просто

8

3 Jan 2025, 19:23 UTC300 viewsread 9 August 2026
File

Welcome to 🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 🔡🔡🔡🔡 🍎 🔡🔡 Этот канал посвящен творчеству Вока-пи NILFRUITS (Niru Kajitsu), а так же творчеству фанатов в виде рисунков, поделок, теорий и прочего 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ▫️🍓😌🔠🤍 🩷🤩🤍👍🔠🍓🍓 🍏Макс (влд) 🤩 Бот для тейков @NilfruitsForEveryDay_bot 🤩ВП пост 🤩Навигация 💞💞💞🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 #️⃣Хештеги #тейк // #адмтейк #вп #важно

17 Nov 2024, 15:15 UTC364 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🦟: ахах, перерывчик подзатянулся, но зато смотрите, какие я нашли флаги красивые эйс-спектра, аро-спектра и апл-спектра Credits ➿➿➿➿➿ #адмтейк

166custom 54201757474677167056🍓1🔥1

14 Nov 2024, 14:03 UTC352 viewsread 9 August 2026

🦟: Я там ещё чучуть планировали, но видимо уже после какого-то перерывчика

14 Nov 2024, 13:56 UTC323 viewsread 9 August 2026

🦟: че-то не влезает иногда в одно сообщение...

14 Nov 2024, 13:55 UTC311 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Термины, сочетающие в себе несколько видов влечений (и не только) 🏳️‍🌈/🏳️‍🌈Ароэйс (aroace) — аромантичные + асексуальные, как и в случае с этими терминами, может использовать как самостоятельный термин (в таком случае чаще всего рассматривается как полное отсутствие романтического и сексуального влечений), так и как зонтичный термин, включающий в себя ориентации ароэйс-спектра 🏳️‍🌈Ароэйс-спектр (aroace-spec) — аро-

4custom 542017574746771670531

14 Nov 2024, 13:55 UTC326 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Воидпанк (voidpunk) — субкультура и идентичность для тех, кто по каким-либо причинам часто чувствует себя отвергаемым в обществе и дисконнект с человечностью. Эта идентичность часто связана с персонами на а-спектре, так как часто в обществе говорят о том, как секс, романтика, дружба, любовь итп — это "то, что делает нас людьми". Но также сюда входят такие группы, как нейроотличные, персоны с инвалидностью, небинарные

3custom 542017574746771670521

14 Nov 2024, 12:37 UTC273 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Третичные влечения Помимо романтического и сексуального влечений существуют и активно используются как в а-спек сообществе, так и даже вне него ещё множество других видов влечения. Их называют третичные влечения. В этих влечениях, как и в романтическом и сексуальном, используются ориентации, и в том числе ориентации а-спектра для описания бесконечного множества различного опыта, связанного с ними Виды третичных вле

🍓6🔥1custom 54201757474677167051

14 Nov 2024, 11:55 UTC207 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Находитесь ли вы на аро-спектре, и используете ли вы термины, описанные в предыдущем посте?

  1. Да, я на аро-спектре, и использую термин/ы с предыдущего поста78%
  2. Да, я на аро-спектре, и использую и термин/ы с предыдущего поста, и те, которых там нет8%
  3. Да, я на аро-спектре, но я использую термин/ы, не описанные в предыдущем посте5%
  4. Нет, я аллоромантичны10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🎃3

14 Nov 2024, 11:47 UTC233 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Аромантичность — романтическая ориентация, определяемая отсутствием или же близостью к отсутствию романтического влечения. Может использоваться как самостоятельная ориентация (в таком случае чаще всего подразумевается как полное отсутствие романтического влечения), либо же как зонтичный термин для всех ориентаций аромантического спектра в зависимости от контекста Аромантический спектр (aro-spec) — спектр романтическ

3custom 54201757474677167052

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @aspecs_together. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Nov 2024, 11:55 UTCAnonymous Poll40 voters

Находитесь ли вы на аро-спектре, и используете ли вы термины, описанные в предыдущем посте?

  1. Да, я на аро-спектре, и использую термин/ы с предыдущего поста78%
  2. Да, я на аро-спектре, и использую и термин/ы с предыдущего поста, и те, которых там нет8%
  3. Да, я на аро-спектре, но я использую термин/ы, не описанные в предыдущем посте5%
  4. Нет, я аллоромантичны10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Nov 2024, 10:49 UTCAnonymous Poll55 voters

Находитесь ли вы на эйс-спектре и используете ли вы термины, описанные в предыдущем посте?

  1. Да, я на эйс-спектре, и использую термин/ы с предыдущего поста76%
  2. Да, я на эйс-спектре, и использую и термин/ы с предыдущего поста, и те, которых там нет13%
  3. Да, я на эйс-спектре, но я использую термин/ы, не описанные в предыдущем посте7%
  4. Нет, я аллосексуальны4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 November 2024 to 22 May 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 814,435 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Aspecs in space” (@aspecs_together), 83 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aspecs_together.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.