Channel
@asodetar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
159subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001826603273 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @asodetar |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/asodetar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 159 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 158 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 937 |
| Reactions total | 69 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
69 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 68.1% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 15.9% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 11.6% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌱 چرا بازی کردن با کودک فقط «وقتگذرانی» نیست؟ شاید برای خیلی از ما بازی کردن با کودک یعنی چند دقیقه عروسکبازی، ماشینبازی یا ساختن یک برج با لگو... اما پژوهشهای جدید نشان میدهند که وقتی والد در بازی کودک واقعاً حضور دارد و با او تعامل میکند، اتفاقهای مهمتری در حال رخ دادن است. ❤️ یک مقاله مروری که در سال ۲۰۲۶ در مجله American Journal of Play منتشر شده، پژوهشهای مربوط به بازی کودکان با والدین و مراقبان را بررس…
❤1👍1
🎾⚽️🏀🏈🥎🎾🏉👆👆👆👆👆👆 نمونه ای از بازی های کانال مامان پلاس🧡🧡 داخل کانال مامان پلاس ✅300 تا بازی ✅گفت و گوی مادرها ✅پشتیبانی رایگان و ✅صدها نکات فرزندپروری داریم ❤️ درمامان پلاس منتظر همه ی مامان هایی که دوست دارند لحظات ناب و با کیفیتی با فرزندشان داشته باشند هستیم❤️
❤2
بازی شماره۶ حفظ تعادل یکی از مهارت های مهم در ایجاد یکپارچگی حسی در کودکان،حفظ تعادل است. مسئله ای که حتی برای من هم عجیب بود این است که یکپارچگی حسی می تواند در فرزند شما نقص در نوشتن،در فهمیدن و....... ایجاد کند و لزوما فقط مربوط به مهارت های حرکتی نیست.عدم یکپارچگی حسی میتواند علائمی مانند ADHD در کودکان ایجاد کند و یا آن ها را دست پاچلفتی و بی تعادل نشان دهد. بازی را برای سن پایین تر به شیوه ای خیلی ساده تر نی…
❤1🔥1
🌱 مامان بودن یعنی همیشه قرار نیست جواب همهچیز رو بدونی... اما میتونی یاد بگیری چطور از سادهترین لحظهها برای رشد فرزندت استفاده کنی. خیلی وقتها لازم نیست اسباببازیهای گران بخری یا ساعتها وقت بذاری؛ یک بازی ساده و درست میتونه فرصتی برای تقویت تمرکز، خلاقیت، حل مسئله،از مهارتهای اجتماعی و خیلی چیزهای دیگه باشه. 🎈درمامان پلاس چی داریم 🎯یک دورهمی عالی مادرانه تا تجاربمون باهم به اشتراک بذاریم 🎯بازی های هدفمند و …
👏3❤1
کانال مامان پلاس پر از بازی های هدفمند ونکته های فرزندپروری مخصوصا برای کودکان پیش از دبستان هست دورانی که بیشترین اثرگذاری را در رشد IQ و EQ کودکان دارد و تنها راه آموزش هم بازی هست. پس چه بهتر هم بازی کنیم هم وقت بگذرونیم و هم آموزش بدیم و فرزندمون یک قدم به رشد بهتر نزدیک تر کنیم امیدوارم مامان های کمی آسوده تر در مامان پلاس دور هم جمع بشوند و همچنین این کانال به آشنایان و دوستان معرفی کنید تا دور هم تابستون پویا…
❤5
💛 اینجا بازی، فقط بازی نیست... اینجا یاد میگیری چطور با چند وسیله ساده و چند دقیقه بازی در روز، به رشد هوش، خلاقیت، تمرکز و مهارتهای کودک کمک کنی. 🎈🧩 👩👧 برای مامانهایی که نمیخوان فقط سرگرمکننده باشند؛ بلکه میخواهند هوشمندانه بازی کنند. ✨ به مامان پلاس خوش اومدی؛ جایی که هر بازی، یک فرصت برای رشد است. 👇 بیا با هم بازیهای ساده، کاربردی و هدفمند رو تجربه کنیم: مامان پلاس 💛 برای کسب اطلاعات بیشتر پیام دهید: ۰…
❤2👏2
مامان پلاس تمام اینا باعث تولد یک گروه شد که خودم خیلی دوستش دارم گروه مامان پلاس مامان پلاس پر از بازی های هدفمند و نکته های فرزند پروری برای بچه ها از لحظه ای که متولد میشوند تا دوره اول ابتدایی ولی قسمت جذاب ماجرا اینکه این بازی ها فقط بازی نیست بازی ها براساس هوش هشتگانه گاردنر طراحی شده و هرکدام به تقویت یکی از ابعاد هوش کمک می کنه یعنی یه پکیج که هم کلاس آموزشیه هم بازی با والدین و هم بچه های ما رو باهوش تر می…
👏4❤1
و گزینه آخر غرغر و کلافگی ,چالش بزرگی که خود من هم با دخترم در تابستون امسال داشتم شنیدن مدام جمله ی «مااااماااان.....حوصله ام سر رفته..»😫
🥰2❤1
نتیجه بعدی که توجه من جلب کرد کلاس های کمک آموزشیبود که نشون میده والدین این کانال چقدر مهارت آموزی فرزندشون و انجام فعالیت های هدفمند براشون مهمه
❤2
ولی نکته جالب تر گزینه ی بازی با والدین بود که هیچی رای نیوورد.درحالی که وقت گذراندن با کیفیت با والدین یکی از مهم ترین عوامل رشد عاطفی و هیجانی و شناختی کودکان است و از آنطرف بدرفتاری ها رو به به شدت کاهش میده.
❤2👏2
سلام به همراهان عزیز کمی آسوده تر: نتایج نظرسنجی پیش رو خیلی جالب بود. خبر خوب این بود که بچه ها خیلی کم با گوشی و تلویزیون حداقل در این کانال درگیر هستند.چون انگار تجربه زیسته ما در اطرافمون نتایج متفاوتی نشون میده🧐🧐
❤2
💛 چرا بازی والدین با کودک اینقدر مهم است؟ بازی فقط سرگرمی نیست؛ یک فرصت طلایی برای ساختن دنیای عاطفی و مهارتی کودک است. وقتی والدین با فرزندشان بازی میکنند: 🌱 پیوند عاطفی عمیقتر میشود کودک احساس میکند دیده و دوست داشته میشود و والدین هم دنیای کودک را بهتر میشناسند. 🌱 اعتماد به نفس کودک افزایش پیدا میکند کودکی که در بازی فرصت انتخاب، اظهار نظر و تجربه کردن دارد، شجاعتر و مستقلتر رشد میکند. 🌱 مهارتهای کلا…
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @asodetar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
حالا که تابستونه.....بیشتر وقت فرزندتون چطور می گذره؟
The shares total 165%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 866,014 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کمی آسوده تر” (@asodetar), 159 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asodetar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.