Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for تحلیل وقایعی از عرفان حلقه

Channel

تحلیل وقایعی از عرفان حلقه

@aslahane_96

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

266subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001099839964
TypeChannel
Username@aslahane_96
CreatedBetween 1 October 2016 and 30 November 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aslahane_96

Growth

2562682626 August 2026 — 256 subscribers7 August 2026 — 256 subscribers14 August 2026 — 266 subscribers21 August 2026 — 268 subscribers27 August 2026 — 266 subscribers2666 August 202627 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 254–270 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 11:46266-2
21 Aug 2026, 01:14268+2
14 Aug 2026, 00:37266+10
7 Aug 2026, 02:02256no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:29256first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.3%
avg views ÷ 266 subscribers
Avg views / post
59.4
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held13 (4 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total772
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 23:13 UTC19 viewsread 7 August 2026

پاسخی از سعید یسائی به بخشی از سخنان مطرح شده خانم بهار الماسی در لینک زیر: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbtLyl0BDGq/?igsh=YzNqeWFldmJkdG9v خانم الماسی، آنچه در ویدئوی شما درباره رفتار فرقه‌ای هواداران عرفان حلقه مطرح شد، با متنی که اخیراً محمدعلی طاهری در لینک زیر منتشر کرده است، https://t.me/aslahane_96/7517 معنای روشن‌ تری پیدا می‌کند. در آن متن، مجددا توسط طاهری، منتقدان و پرسشگران به‌جای دریافت پاسخی مستدل

6 Aug 2026, 22:57 UTC15 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mataherinews2

📌عدم پاسخ به مزدوران فضای مجازی 🟢به دنبال از سرگرفته شدن فعالیت تشکل نجات از اعتیاد بین الملل مکتب عرفان کیهانی حلقه مشاهده شده که در روزهای اخیر برخی از عوامل مشکوک و مزدوران فضای مجازی جریان های متعددی را بر علیه مکتب عرفان کیهانی حلقه به راه انداخته و به شعور جمعی این خانواده بزرگ توهین می کنند (که البته موضوع جدیدی نیست ). این افراد قصد دارند ضمن لجن پراکنی و نشان دادن شعور نداشته خود از مکتب عرفان کیهانی حلقه

6 Aug 2026, 21:27 UTC22 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @soozanbkhodPhoto

در ارتباط با آخرین پست کانال لازم دیدم مطلبی عرض کنم: جناب استاد معظمِ عرفان ،آینه چون نقش تو بنمود راست خود شکن آیینه شکستن خطاست آنکه بدنبال پیشرفت است حرمت نقادان را نگه می‌دارد چرا که منتقد عیوب را آشکار می‌سازد و مسبب رفع عیوب می‌گردد این خشم و بدزبانی جنابعالی احوالات مستاصل و بیچارگی را عیان می‌کند مطلب دیگر آنکه کدام تشکل بین الملل؟ در هر جای دنیا وقتی یک جماعتی بطور رسمی بخواهند فعالیتی بکنند بایستی در ر

6 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC32 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @soozanbkhodPhoto

از نگاه محمدعلی طاهری، رییس فرقه حلقه هر منتقدی لجن پراکن و عوامل مشکوک و امتیاز بگیر است. پاسخ نقد اینگونه متن‌ها نیست! در جامعه ای زندگی می‌کنیم که هر انسانی حق اظهار نظر و بیان حقیقت را دارد، اگر پیروان تو حرفی برای گفتن دارند به آنها اجازه صحبت بده، اما رییس فرقه حتی در‌این خصوص هم نظر داده که اعضای فرقه حتی حق پاسخ هم ندارند!!!! و درست مثل دوره های کودکی در دبستان با «جواب ابهان خاموشی است» سعی در ساکت کردن جو د

6 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC67 viewsread 7 August 2026

طاهری و دروغ «اپوزیسیون دست‌نشانده»؛ پیشگویی‌ای که چند ماه هم دوام نیاورد! پنجاه سال سکوت طاهری درباره دست‌نشانده‌های واقعی؛ فریاد فقط علیه «اپوزیسیون»! https://t.me/aslahane_96/7510 همان‌طور که در این اسکرین شات ها و ویدیوها، که در چندین فایل مشابه دیگرِ طاهری هم تکرار شده می‌بینیم، طاهری در راستای حفظ حکومت و نگه داشتن مردم پشت حکومت، و جا انداختن اینکه اینها برن کی بیاد، در زمان جنگ خیلی روی این پروپاگاندای حک

5 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC67 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

دو همکار، دو همراه؛ آنقدر هماهنگ که حتی صدها تزریق فیلر و بوتاکس را هم با هم انجام داده‌اند ظاهراً حکومتی ها مردهای این شکلی پف‌کرده و مصنوعی میپسندد. اینها هم خودشون رو براشون اینطوری خوشگل میکنند. میبینیم که حکومت برای تحریف وقایع ۱۸ و ۱۹ دی، یکی‌یکی مهره‌هایش را به میدان میفرستد و میسوزاند. طاهری نیز بارها در فایلهای صوتی و نوشتاری خود ادعا کرده که چهل هزار کشته چون طرفدار اسرائیل بوده‌اند و به جای روحانیت، از

5 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC68 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

پیا‌م‌های دریافتی @AD1_review @aslahane_96

5 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC79 viewsread 7 August 2026

این هم یکی دیگر از تجمعات دهها هزار نفره «نه به جنگ، تف به اپوزیسیون، آری به سفیدشویی رژیم، دشمن ما خارجه نه این که داخله» فرقه ی طاهری؛ این بار در #منچستر انگلیس.👇 https://t.me/aslahane_96/7500 در ادعا و روی کاغذ، جمعیت این فرقه میلیونیست، در عمل، تعدادشان اینه. در فضای مجازی که میشود لایک، ویو و فالوور خرید و هر کدام هم دهها اکانت میسازند، چون داشتن چندین اکانت جزو شرایط ماندن در فرقه است ــ چندین هزار نفر اند،

4 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC88 viewsread 7 August 2026

این عکس ها و ویدیوها را ببینید. آیا طاهری با پادشاهی مخالف است، یا این همه جلز و ولز برای این است که می‌خواهد خودش پادشاه ایران باشد؟ https://t.me/aslahane_96/7492 از دیدار حضوری تا آنلاین؛ جا انداختن فرهنگ فرقه‌ایِ تقدیس طاهری؛ تعظیم، دست‌بوسی و نمایش اطاعت. می‌بینیم که دارند این رفتارهای سلام نازی و «هایل هیتلر» و تا کمر خم شدن برای بوسیدن دست طاهری را در فرقه به‌تدریج به یک رسم عادی و قابل‌قبول تبدیل می‌کنند.

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @aslahane_96. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 304,623 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تحلیل وقایعی از عرفان حلقه” (@aslahane_96), 266 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aslahane_96.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.