Channel
@ashekitty
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
25subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002261124939 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ashekitty |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ashekitty |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 25 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 26 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 27 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 27 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 27 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
41 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5350420389044430985 | 22 | 53.7% | |
| custom 5251704164928486850 | 10 | 24.4% | |
| custom 5249386192553669776 | 6 | 14.6% | |
| custom 5010313873178233853 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| custom 5242391881261808521 | 1 | 2.44% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 23 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ashekitty. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 January 2026 to 23 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
𝘴𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘐 𝘩𝘰𝘱𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘐'𝘮 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢 𝘷𝘪𝘳𝘨𝘪𝘯. all this touching 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑜𝑢𝑐ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 аll this touching 𝔞𝔩𝔩 𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔰𝔢 𝔣𝔞𝔠𝔢𝔰 аll this fun is 𝗢-𝗩𝗘-𝗥𝗥𝗔-𝗧𝗘𝗗 аre you cumming? 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚌𝚞𝚖𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚐? тo first, second, 𝕒𝕟𝕕 𝕥𝕙𝕚𝕣𝕕 𝕓𝕒𝕤𝕖𝕤 аll this kissing, french kissing his tongue is 𝗢-𝗩𝗘-𝗥𝗥𝗔-𝗧𝗘𝗗
✷ его жесты. ✷ его цели. ✷ его амбиции. ✷ его интеллект. ✷ его вопросы. ✷ его волнение. ✷ его советы. ✷ его тепло. ✷ его уют. ✷ его мечты. ✷ его рассказы. ✷ его внимание. ✷ его мимика. ✷ его взгляд на жизнь. ✷ его «я рядом.» ✷ его «доброе утро» и «сладкий снов» ✷ его шепот. ✷ его начитанность. ✷ его любопытство. ✷ его таланты. ✷ его объятия. ✷ его поцелуи. ✷ его поведение. ✷ его попа. ✷ его маникюр. ✷ его хобби. ✷ ег…
𝄄 ᛝ 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑙𝑜꯭𝑣𝑒 . . ︶⏝ ᜊ 100 причин любить его.ᜊ ✷ его смех. ✷ его улыбка. ✷ его харизма. ✷ его волосы. ✷ его музыкальный вкус. ✷ его глаза. ✷ его руки. ✷ его характер. ✷ его ревность. ✷ его подарки. ✷ его стеснение. ✷ его ножки. ✷ его губки. ✷ его верность. ✷ его честность. ✷ его чувство юмора. ✷ его чувство справедливости. ✷ его нежность. ✷ его мягкость. ✷ его сюрпризы. ✷ его забота. ✷ его доброта. ✷ его ис…
« ты Кэсси которая позвонила 38 раз или Мэдди которая не позвонила ни разу? » я Максим который забыл калькулятор на экзамен по химии.
custom 52517041649284868505
Photo, posted without a caption
ришк.
custom 52517041649284868504
риши, рэйн, энни, ника, соул. и я. ашие. 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑎𝑙𝑤𝑎𝑦𝑠 𝑏𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑚𝑦 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑡.
custom 53504203890444309858
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52423918812618085211custom 52517041649284868501
я твердил что я люблю себя. но ведь все мы знаем кто для себя становится самой ужасной тварью когда тратит деньги на ненужные вещи.
custom 53504203890444309853
channel wth my b3loved. @asheaiz
custom 52493861925536697763
𝐼'𝑚 𝑠𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑘 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑦𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑓.
custom 53504203890444309854
я был готов разорвать ему глотку, но почему в итоге он гладит меня по голове и говорит что все хорошо?
custom 53504203890444309854
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ashekitty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,293,236 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ashekitty named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑺𝒖𝒉𝒖 𝒎𝒖𝒍𝒍𝒆.” (@ashekitty), 25 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ashekitty.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.