Channel
@asfalt_i_bolota
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
114subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002572297537 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @asfalt_i_bolota |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/asfalt_i_bolota |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:42 | 114 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 113 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 110 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 110 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
193 reactions across 9 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 25.4% | |
| 🔥 | 46 | 23.8% | |
| 👍 | 40 | 20.7% | |
| 😁 | 20 | 10.4% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 7.25% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 3.63% | |
| custom 5391320026869408028 | 4 | 2.07% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 2.07% | |
| custom 5271773396051442958 | 3 | 1.55% | |
| custom 5224200886581992369 | 2 | 1.04% | |
| custom 5341537563452647562 | 2 | 1.04% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.518% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.518% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
За 400м до финиша понимал, что команда на 3 или 4 месте. Вижу, парень активно бежит, думаю, наверное, на финиш. Догоняю. Далее диалог: Я: "эстафета?" Он: "да" Я: "смешанная?" Он: "да! а ты?" Я: "тоже" . Я сразу же даю по газам и слышу сзади: "бля" Оказалось, мы 2е 😁
😁20👍3🔥2🎉1
Бывают еще оказывается плотно наполнненые разными штучками стартовые пакеты ( рюкзаки ) участника
🔥7👍2❤1custom 52242008865819923691custom 52717733960514429581custom 53415375634526475621
Вот она победа ✌️
❤10👍10🏆7custom 53913200268694080282custom 52242008865819923691
Сегодня забежал AMAZING RED Изначально думал размяться на пятёрке. А выдать все на одном километре, но что то разогнался по ходу и уже доделал это дело Вся информация по челленджу тут
🔥16👍3custom 53913200268694080282custom 52717733960514429581custom 53415375634526475621
Из последнего: появилась дома вот такая штука, пока будет только пыль собирать. Так как основной агрегат даже не заказан. И второе, сегодня в конце работы показал на отрезке 200м личный рекорд 27:04. Получается, в течение недели рекорд от марафона до 200м Бывает же такое
❤10👍6⚡4custom 52717733960514429581
В прогнозе результатов, на моё удивление, большинство были очень рядом, но ближе всех оказался @JeanMarkPopov Всего одна секунда до идеального попадания. Так как приза было два, думаю, справедливо второй вручить @Grusha_vrn , он ошибся всего лишь на 2 секунды. Поздравляю победителей!!!
👏14❤2
Добрался до разбора статистики и фотоматериалов. По трассе и погоде в сравнении с прошлым годом было чуть душновато, но не критично. Ветер был, но не такой, как в том году, мне кажется. Как и в прошлом году бежал в основном один, периодически получалось вставать за экиденщиками и отставшим африканцем. Первую половину начал, казалось, хорошо, но судя по темпу после 25 км, нужно было начинать тише, как рекомендовал тр…
❤19🔥19👍6❤🔥1
В преддверии марафона, а к тому же к юбилею данного канала (1 год!), делаем розыгрыш🤩 Кто в комментариях к этому посту укажет наиболее точный прогноз моего результата по чип-тайм в формате "2:28:48 " получит на выбор: 1) набор" Openface" или 2) футболку (майку) СберПрайм марафона «Белые ночи» ( размера М). Если будет два одинаковых прогноза, то приоритет у того, кто раньше оставил комментарий. Комментарии принимаю…
❤7👍3
9/10 (22.06-28.06) 151 км На этой неделе бежали эстафету "Максима Кросс" от Zelrun с Костяном. 5км круг с различным ландшафтом (песок, трава, вода). Ожидал спокойной гонки, но пришлось упираться, Дима Сафронов дал хороший бой, только на последнем километре смог привезти 3-5 секунд форы для Кости. Она ему особо оказалась не нужна, победили с более чем минутным преимуществом. ПН - 30 км ( утро /вечер кросс) ВТ - 6*…
👍7🔥2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @asfalt_i_bolota. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Истории с асфальта и болот” (@asfalt_i_bolota), 114 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asfalt_i_bolota.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.