Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Мифический редактор

@asevella

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,894subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001642665619
TypeChannel
Username@asevella
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/asevella

Growth

1,8941,8961,8956 August 2026 — 1,896 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,895 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,896 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,894 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,894–1,896 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:361,894-2
10 Aug 2026, 12:251,896+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:511,895-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:181,896first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 11 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

509 reactions across 9 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23446.0%
❤‍🔥7815.3%
🔥7815.3%
👍285.50%
💯173.34%
🥰152.95%
😱132.55%
🤩112.16%
101.96%
😁91.77%
🌚81.57%
💔30.589%
🎉20.393%
👏20.393%
😢10.196%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 509reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2025 to 22 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Apr 2026, 14:24 UTC830 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

То, о чем я думаю целый день, - Оля уже написала 🙏 Очень уж часто переполненность ниши путают с «трендом».

13

22 Apr 2026, 14:24 UTC853 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kabinet_izdatelyaPhoto

О трендах, пчелах и переполненных нишах ✨ Всем привет! Весна — сезон новостей, и отовсюду летят слова «тренд», «тренд», «тренд». Хочу сказать одну важную вещь, которую часто упускают. Тренд и популярность — это разные вещи. Тренд — это изменение. Заметное движение в какую-либо сторону: вверх или вниз. А если движения нет — это не тренд, это просто текущий уровень популярности. Полка, на которой все стоит. Почему

🔥21💯1712❤‍🔥1

21 Jan 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,450 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дорогие писатели, успевайте поучаствовать в нашем кладбищенском сборнике 🪦⚰️⚰️⚰️

10👍3

21 Jan 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,550 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mifprozaPhoto

Друзья, напоминаем про наш опен-колл для сборника мистических рассказов МИФ x Шуфлядка Писателя. Ждём ваши работы до 25 января, все подробности в этом посте 💕

10🔥5🤩4

18 Dec 2025, 16:52 UTC≈1,800 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @delaemknigi

🧚‍♀️Шеф-редактор направления «Современная жанровая художественная литература» #ищут в издательство «МИФ» Задачи: 👌наполнение портфеля по своему направлению - поиск, отбор, утверждение проектов, запуск в работу, распределение по матрице и маркетинговая упаковка переводных и русскоязычных книг в соответствии со стратегией редакции; 👌вывод новых книжных направлений на рынок; 👌разработка и ежеквартальная корректировка с

😱1310🌚4💔3🔥32🎉2😢1

10 May 2025, 13:30 UTC≈3,790 views98 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Айфон напомнил, что я выпустилась из Вышки 8 лет назад 🫣 Интересный опыт это был, конечно, повторить не хочу 😂

60🔥25😁9🤩3🌚1

29 Apr 2025, 18:42 UTC≈3,040 views80 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mifprozaPhoto

Какая чудесная новость! Книги двух наших авторов, Марии Аксёновой («Дитя леса») и Алёны Селютиной («А леса у нас тихие») попали в длинный список премии «Лицей» 2025 года! Всего в этом году на соискание премии «Лицей» было подано 2028 заявок от авторов из 298 городов России и 28 стран мира (1271 — в номинации «Проза», 757 — «Поэзия»). Обнимаем и гордимся ♥️

44🔥20👍16

11 Apr 2025, 20:14 UTC≈3,080 views127 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На выставке нонфикшн весна в самом разгаре, издательства в этот раз привезли невероятно красивые стенды 😍 Наш тоже классный, правда? Особенно приятно мне было узнать, что лучшие продажи на нашем стенде — у русскоязычных авторов. Горжусь вами 💜 Делитесь фото с выставки 📸

❤‍🔥7724🥰15🔥4🤩4👏2🌚1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @asevella. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,077,761 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мифический редактор” (@asevella), 1,894 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asevella.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.