Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بين السماء والفكر.

Channel

بين السماء والفكر.

@asaralilm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

132subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003890798265
TypeChannel
Username@asaralilm
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/asaralilm

Growth

1301321317 August 2026 — 130 subscribers9 August 2026 — 130 subscribers14 August 2026 — 132 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 130–132 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:47132+2
9 Aug 2026, 01:15130no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:03130first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.6%
avg views ÷ 132 subscribers
Avg views / post
49.7
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held19 (6 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total944
Reactions total124
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 01:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

124 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4536.3%
💘2923.4%
💔2721.8%
🔥2318.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC21 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ну мало ли что, руки тоже замазываю

3💘3🔥2

8 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC41 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ибн Раджаб сказал Поистине Аллах любит, когда у него просят и гневается на того, кто не просит. Поистине, Он желает, чтобы Его рабы просили у Него, и вызвали к Нему и нуждались в Нем, и Он любит тех, кто проявляет настойчивость в своих мольбах. 📚 Завещание Пророка ﷺ ибн Аббасу стр 65

5💔5🔥5💘1

8 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC132 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ибн Раджаб сказал "Есть надежда, что для того, чьим собеседником во время уединения в этом мире был Аллах,Он будет собеседников в могильной тьме". 📚 Завещание Пророка ﷺ ибн Аббасу стр 57

3💔3🔥3

8 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC43 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

На днях начал читать эту книгу. Книга буквально наполнена наставлениями и их здесь действительно очень много. При этом она написана настолько легко и доступно, что читается незаметно. Страницы пролетают одна за другой, и даже не замечаешь, сколько уже прочитал. Сегодня ради интереса решил посмотреть, сколько книг мне удалось прочитать за последние 2 месяца как с устазами, так и самостоятельно. Честно говоря, резуль

🔥4

8 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC40 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Рашид ибн Саад сказал "Некий человек сказал Абу Дарде "Дай мне совет",на что тот ответил:" Поминай Аллаха в радости, и Он поменят тебя в печали". 📚 Завещание Пророка ﷺ ибн Аббасу стр 56

2🔥2

8 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC46 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Да не, уже все. Канал умер.

💔7

8 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC44 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Удивительно не так ли? А что ещё нужно?

💘5

8 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC44 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Первые мгновения в Раю Первые мгновения в Раю будут очень впечатляющими. Когда мы увидим реки, дворцы, фрукты, шатры, золото, жемчуг и шёлк. Когда мы встретим близких, которые давно умерли и ушли от нас. Когда праведный сын встретит свою мать, а отец свою дочь. Когда мы увидим исцелившегося больного, страдающего от неизлечимой болезни. Когда мы встретим пророков, поприветствуем сподвижников, познакомимся с учён

6💘2

8 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC34 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @bloknotik_muslima

Действителен ли развод в состоянии алкогольного или иного опьянения? 🪶 Имам Ибн Накиб аль-Мисри аш-Шафии [702-769х] (да смилуется над ним Аллах), пишет: «Если человек утратил свой разум по причине, которая не является оправданием — например, из-за алкогольного (или наркотического) опьянения; или из-принятия лекарств, устраняющих разум, без на то необходимости, — то его развод считается действительным (ведь он сам

4💔2💘2

7 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC45 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Как нибудь я вернусь к этой книге и дочитаю ее ин Ша Аллах1

4💘2🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC45 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Сказал Абу Хатим Разумному человеку не следует предаваться печали, ведь печаль не приносит пользы, а её избыток умаляет разум. И не следует ему скорбеть, ибо скорбь не возвращает утрату, а её постоянство ослабляет разум. 📚Равдатуль Укаля стр 20

5💘3💔2

7 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC40 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ar_rrayaan

имам Газали пишет в «Ихья», что тот, кто помнит смерть, перестаёт бояться бедности, потому-что понимает, что единственная настоящая бедность это прийти к Аллагьу с пустым сердцем.

💔3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @asaralilm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 554,455 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بين السماء والفكر.” (@asaralilm), 132 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asaralilm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.