Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ارزدیجیتال_آموزش

Channel

ارزدیجیتال_آموزش

@arzdigital_amoozesh

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

673subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001292019380
TypeChannel
Username@arzdigital_amoozesh
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/arzdigital_amoozesh

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6736836786 August 2026 — 683 subscribers6 August 2026 — 683 subscribers14 August 2026 — 681 subscribers21 August 2026 — 680 subscribers27 August 2026 — 678 subscribers3 September 2026 — 676 subscribers12 September 2026 — 673 subscribers6 August 202612 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 672–685 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 02:41673-3
3 Sept 2026, 11:01676-2
27 Aug 2026, 13:26678-2
21 Aug 2026, 05:17680-1
14 Aug 2026, 03:46681-2
6 Aug 2026, 16:38683no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:41683first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 January 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2247.8%
1430.4%
🤔36.52%
😍24.35%
🤣24.35%
🎃12.17%
👎12.17%
🥴12.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2023 to 14 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Mar 2025, 23:32 UTC346 viewsread 6 August 2026

@mghaffari_analysis 👆اونایی که منو یادشون رفته ... ما الان سه ساله تو این کانالیم چرا نیومدید ؟

14 Mar 2025, 23:30 UTC338 viewsread 6 August 2026

وقتی بوی گوشت سوخته پر کرد هوا رو دیدم منقار لاشه خوار کلاغا رو… دلم واسه مردم این ده که نسوخت هیچ یه آتیش کوچیک روشن کردم ♪♩ و تماشا کردم زیبایی انتهارو

18 Oct 2023, 22:03 UTC≈1,180 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mghaffari_analysisPoll

استخدام تریدر توسط حساب دمو، با هزینه ثبت نام! به نظرتون منطقیه که ریسک بشه برای پاس کردن این چالش؟

  1. آره بابا25%
  2. نه😐عمرا42%
  3. ببینم بقیه چی گفتن😏33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍4🥴1

18 Oct 2023, 22:03 UTC533 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mghaffari_analysis

تو پست اسلایدی امروز ظهر و استوری‌های مربوط به اون، راجع به چالش پراپ مفصل صحبت کردیم! پراپ‌فرم‌ها یا برگزار کننده‌های چالش‌های پراپ در ازای دریافت مبلغی به شما شانس شرکت در یک چالش ترید رو میدن!!

18 Oct 2023, 22:03 UTC696 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mghaffari_analysis

✅ که اگر اون رو پاس کنید ازشون بودجه‌ی چندهزار‌دلاری تا چند‌صد‌هزار دلاری برای ترید دریافت میکنید! ‼️ نکته اینجاست که برای پاس کردن چالش یا حتی بعد از دریافت بودجه شما باید براساس یکسری قوانین و محدودیت‌ها ترید کنید که توی هر پراپ‌فرم میتونه متفاوت باشه ⚠️ مثلا میزان ضرر شما در یک روز یا ضرر کلی شما روی حساب محدودیت داره برای محدودیت زیان بعضی‌ها از ضرر رو از بالانس فعلی حساب و بعضی‌ها نسبت به بالانس اولیه در نظ

👍2

18 Oct 2023, 22:03 UTC807 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mghaffari_analysis

❌❌❌ ترید در تایم خبر در بیشتر چالش‌ها ممنوعه!! و باز هم چنین محدودیتی از دید من منطقی نیست‼️ 🔰 چون بعنوان مثال استراتژی «بیگ‌آلارم» خودمون بارها در تایم خبر بهمون محدوده‌های برگشتی رو داده و تو تایم خبر که نوسان بیشتر هست بازدهی خوبی برامون ایجاد میکنه!

18 Oct 2023, 22:03 UTC958 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mghaffari_analysisPhoto

✅ طبق داده‌های مجله Prop Journalist تنها ۰/۲۸٪ از تریدرها از پراپ‌ها درآمدزایی میکنن! یعنی به ازای هر ۲۸ نفر بین ۱۰,۰۰۰ نفر (۲/۸ بین ۱,۰۰۰ نفر و ۱ یین ۳۶۲ نفر)

18 Oct 2023, 22:03 UTC≈1,090 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mghaffari_analysis

یک نفر از هر ۱۸۰ هزارو ۶۳۸ دلاری که پراپ فرم‌ها درآمدزایی میکنن، این چالش رو پاس میکنه! و ۱۰۰ دلار به بالایی که، هزینه ثبت نامه؛ چیزی حدود ۵ میلیون الی چند ده میلیون درآمد پراپ فرم میشه!!!

👍2

18 Oct 2023, 21:59 UTC576 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mghaffari_analysisPhoto

https://www.instagram.com/p/CyiBu0ioA5N/?igshid=MTc4MmM1YmI2Ng==

👍1

9 Sept 2023, 23:48 UTC719 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

زندگی بازی فردی نیست یه بازی گروهیه مثل فوتبال یا والیبال ،،، باید جامعه خوبی داشته باشی و بدونی با یارات چجوری پاسکاری کنی با تکروی به جایی نمیرسی ❤️

👍3

1 Sept 2023, 09:13 UTC828 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

به نظر من چند روز میانگین ضریب هوشی کشور چند واحد افزایش پیدا میکنه از الان تا چند روز دیگه ،،، و از هفته بعد دوباره رفته رفته کاهشی میشه ،،، دلیلشم شخصیه نمیتونم بگم

👍4🤔3🤣21🎃1👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @arzdigital_amoozesh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Oct 2023, 22:03 UTCAnonymous Poll153 voters

استخدام تریدر توسط حساب دمو، با هزینه ثبت نام! به نظرتون منطقیه که ریسک بشه برای پاس کردن این چالش؟

  1. آره بابا25%
  2. نه😐عمرا42%
  3. ببینم بقیه چی گفتن😏33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2023 to 14 March 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ارزدیجیتال_آموزش” (@arzdigital_amoozesh), 673 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arzdigital_amoozesh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.