4 measurements spanning 10 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57–117 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 10:20
108
-2
10 Sept 2026, 15:22
110
no change
10 Sept 2026, 14:38
110
+46
8 Sept 2026, 03:47
64
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
56.9%
avg views ÷ 108 subscribers
Avg views / post
61.5
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held
20 (8 September 2026 – 10 September 2026)
Views total
1,230
Reactions total
22
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Sept 2026, 15:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
22 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
21
95.5%
🔥
1
4.55%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🪙 استلار میزبان نخستین انتقال واقعی یواس بانک با استیبلکوین اختصاصی
🔺بانک آمریکایی «یواس بانک» نخستین آزمایش عملی استیبلکوین اختصاصی خود، یواسبیدیسی، را با موفقیت روی شبکه عمومی استلار انجام داد و انتقال واقعی پول میان شعب آمریکا و اروپا را آزمایش کرد. این سامانه با مدیریت ریسک بانک یکپارچه است و امکان مسدودسازی یا بازگرداندن وجوه را فراهم میکند.
🔺مدیرعامل بانک اعلام کرد این فناوری امکان انتقال سرمایه میان…
🟡 طلای ۱۸ عیار رکورد جدید زد؛ موج صعودی طلا ادامه دارد
📈بازار طلا بار دیگر سقف تاریخی تازهای ثبت کرد.
قیمت هر گرم طلای ۱۸ عیار با ادامه روند صعودی، به سطوح جدیدی رسیده و رکورد تازهای را در بازار داخلی ثبت کرده است.
📊 رشد همزمان اونس جهانی طلا و نرخ ارز در بازار داخلی از مهمترین عوامل تقویت قیمت طلا در روزهای اخیر بودهاند.
📈 از مهمترین عوامل اثرگذار بر این روند میتوان به این موارد اشاره کرد:
🔹 رشد قیمت اونس …
🛢 چرا نفت دوباره ۱۰۰ دلاری شد؟
💭 قیمت نفت برنت دوباره از ۱۰۰ دلار در هر بشکه عبور کرد؛ سطحی که از ماه جولای دیده نشده بود. اما دلیل این رشد، افزایش تقاضای جهانی نیست؛ بازار بیشتر نگران اختلال در عرضه نفت است.
🚨 تنشهای جدید در خاورمیانه و نگرانی درباره مسیرهای انتقال انرژی، باعث شده معاملهگران احتمال کاهش عرضه را جدیتر بگیرن. تنگه هرمز که یکی از مسیرهای مهم انتقال نفت جهانه، دوباره زیر ذرهبین بازار قرار گرفته و …
تحلیل کوتاه طلا
طلا پس از بازیابی از محدوده ۴,۳۴۰ دلار، اکنون در قیمت ۴,۴۱۰ دلار معامله میشود. سناریوی اصلی برای امروز ابتدا ادامه حرکت صعودی و نفوذ به محدوده ۴,۵۰۵ دلار و سپس مشاهده چرخش و تاییدیه نزولی جهت ورود به معامله فروش به مقصد اهداف ۴,۴۰۰، ۴,۳۶۰ و در نهایت نقدینگی ۴,۳۴۰ دلار. تثبیت کندل یکساعته بالای سطح ۴,۵۰۵ دلار، این سناریوی چرخش نزولی را کاملاً باطل میکند.
@Arz_dan
⭕️ بازار امروز در یک نگاه | چهارشنبه ۱۸ شهریور
🔻 خلاصه سریع:
بیت کوین با وجود جهش قیمت نفت و فشارهای ژئوپلیتیک، حمایت ۷۸,۰۰۰ دلار رو حفظ کرد و بازار همچنان در وضعیت انتظار باقی مونده.
📌 ۳ نکته مهم:
۱. اعتراف سرکرده شبکه سرقت ۲۴۵ میلیون دلاری کریپتو به جرم خود در آمریکا.
۲. خرید شرکت تازاپی توسط سرکل برای گسترش شبکه پرداختهای بینالمللی با استیبل کوین.
۳. توقف موقت خریدهای بیت کوین شرکت استراتژی برای بازخرید ۱۷۶ می…
🛢 نفت به مرز ۱۰۰ دلار رسید
🔺 نفت برنت امروز تا نزدیکی ۹۹ دلار بالا رفت؛ چهارمین روز متوالی رشد قیمت نفت.
عامل اصلی این حرکت، تشدید درگیریهای خاورمیانه و نگرانی درباره اختلال در عرضه انرژی است.
❓اما سوال مهم بازار این است:
آیا نفت واقعاً میتواند از ۱۰۰ دلار عبور کند؟
چون برخلاف شوکهای قبلی، هنوز بخشی از عرضه جهانی ادامه دارد و بازار منتظر این است که ببیند آیا اختلالها موقتی هستند یا طولانیمدت.
💡 اگر نفت بالاتر…
صندوقهای نقره با مثبت 3/5 درصد و صندوقهای طلا با مثبت 2 درصد کار خودشون رو شروع کردن‼️
طلا 18 عیار: 24/000/000 تومان
نقره 925: 457/000 تومان
تتر: 229/850 تومان
اونس جهانی طلا: 4/400 دلار
بیت کوین: 79/640 دلار
@Arz_dan
شروع بازار بورس با پیش گشایش ۳۲ همتی‼️
تقریبا ۷۰ درصد بورس مثبت باز شد
@Arz_dan
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @arz_dan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ارز دانARZ DAN” (@arz_dan), 108 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arz_dan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.