2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 483–485 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 14:15
484
no change
28 Aug 2026, 14:00
484
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
18
Links
14
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
111 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
29
26.1%
🤡
21
18.9%
🥰
10
9.01%
👎
9
8.11%
⚡
8
7.21%
🔥
8
7.21%
😢
8
7.21%
🤮
7
6.31%
💋
5
4.50%
💘
3
2.70%
❤🔥
1
0.901%
🕊
1
0.901%
🖕
1
0.901%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @arxanprk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 June 2026 to 3 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Приветствуем!
Это проверка проекта на: флуд по битве экстрасенсов.
И этот проект, наоборот, заслуженно попадает в список лучших.
Почему? Сейчас разберём:
Когда админ зашел сразу запустили калл, многие участники поздоровались,некоторые админы сразу начали получше узнавать админа и чем он интересуется.
Атмосфера во флуде хорошая, там приятно находиться, участники комфортные.
Актив во флуде достаточно хороший, каж…
Ребята! Многие этого ждали: открывается набор в админы. Если хотите быть админом, то жду заявку. Буду рада видеть каждого из вас
https://t.me/+_l3s0x_movNmYmYy
Приветствуем!
Это проверка проекта на:
• флуд
• качество
• ролевую
Проект занимает среднюю позицию.
Плюсы:
• хорошо оформлено инфо
• при входе человека- здороваются почти все.
• кидают актив посты.
•владелец 50/50 справляется со своей задачей
•когда заходит человек делают калл
Минусы:
• я писала много раз во время активности в чат "как вы?, как дела?" мне отвечали два-три человека.При активности 5-6-и.
• плохой …
Приветствуем!
Это проверка проекта на:
• флуд по фд марвел
И этот проект, наоборот, заслуженно попадает в список лучших.
Почему? Сейчас разберём:
Проект хорошо организован и оставляет положительное впечатление. С первых минут заметна активность участников и нормальное взаимодействие между ними. Общение проходит спокойно, без лишнего негатива, а новые участники быстро вовлекаются в процесс.
Администрация адекватна…
Приветствуем!
Это проверка проекта на:
Флуд по битве экстрасенсов.
Проект занимает среднюю позицию.
Плюсы: когда админ зашел во флуд сразу запустили калл, так же многие ребята поздоровались, спросили как дела, сказали свои роли.
Актив во флуде хороший, много кто общается, к вам хорошо относятся.
В инфо все достаточно аккуратно, жаль что без навигации.
Минусы:
Когда админ попросил помочь влиться владелец написал п…
Приветствуем!
Это проверка проекта на:
• флуд по бэ/битве экстрасенсов
Проект занимает среднюю позицию.
почему? сейчас расскажу:
Приняли достаточно быстро и приветливо. Влд ответственная и равнодушная.
Инфо оформлена не очень: всё наляписто, правила и роли свои, и это видно. Когда я зашла во флуд, то со мной поздоровались некоторые участники, многие задали базовые вопросы, и всё. Вливать сильно меня никто не стал.…
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение!
У тя отписки ебашат каждый день. Тебе самой не жалко свой труд, который ты еле буквально высираешь? Даже коммы удалила, тупо ебанутая
⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.
❤2
Signed ненавистная.
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @arxanprk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@arxanprk named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@informationfloodghostlyshadow named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
@nihonwakakkoidesu named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nenavistnai proverka” (@arxanprk), 484 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arxanprk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
