Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Art Studiolo • гид по искусству

@artstudiolo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

219subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001167047732
TypeChannel
Username@artstudiolo
Descriptionпознакомлю с историей искусства 🫶🏼 помогу раскрыть секреты картин 🔍 проведу по музейным коллекциям 🏛 💌 hello@artstudiolo.com artstudiolo.com Автор проекта Арт Студиоло: искусствовед Валерия Мачнева
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/artstudiolo

Growth

2197 Aug 2026, 06:07 — 219 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 06:18 — 219 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 06:077 Aug 2026, 06:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 218–220 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 06:18219no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:07219first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 2 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,710
Videos
3
Links
204

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

108 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7266.7%
😢109.26%
custom 528278213167050466487.41%
😱87.41%
👍54.63%
🔥32.78%
👌10.926%
👏10.926%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2025 to 2 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2025, 10:40 UTC261 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @artguide_comPhoto

Амстердамский Музей Ван Гога может закрыться из-за недостатка финансирования Институция утверждает, что будет вынуждена закрыться, если правительство Нидерландов не выделит дополнительные средства на реконструкцию здания. По заявлению музея, правительство «не выполняет обещание», данное Фонду Винсента Ван Гога в 1962 году. По соглашению 1962 года, подписанному после того, как потомки художника решили передать сотни

😢10😱8

22 Aug 2025, 14:48 UTC232 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня в книжном клубе мы обсуждаем творчество Густава Климта. Если хотите поделиться своими впечатлениями от его картин – буду рада их прочитать в комментариях под этим постом 💛 Эфир о модерне в Австрии проведу в понедельник, 25 августа ☺️ а уже в среду мы обсудим произведения Альфонса Мухи.

custom 528278213167050466482

13 Aug 2025, 16:28 UTC252 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Запись прямого эфира "Модерн в Испании" Если остались вопросы — задавайте их в комментариях к этому посту ❤️

6🔥3

12 Aug 2025, 12:38 UTC216 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

А хотите я завтра в 18:30 проведу здесь прямой эфир об испанском модерне? Ведь не только Гауди творил на рубеже XIX-XX веков и не только в Барселоне можно увидеть примеры модерна.

  1. Да, хочу!53%
  2. Возможно посмотрю в записи47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2025, 11:55 UTC187 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Фотографиями Саграды Фамилии двухнедельной давности заманиваю вас на обсуждение творчества Антонио Гауди в нашем книжном клубе. Присоединяйтесь по ссылке

7

3 Aug 2025, 12:19 UTC199 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Друзья! После долгого перерыва возвращаюсь к вам с анонсом нового книжного клуба❣️ Предлагаю в августе прочитать легкую книгу о прекрасном модерне, а также дополнить наши чтения онлайн-встречей в конце месяца. На эфире расскажу о том, где искать модерн в Вене, Барселоне и Париже, какие книги и другие ресурсы можно будет дополнительно изучить по этой теме ❤️ Все обсуждения будем вести в книжном клубе по этой ссылке

8👌1👏1

12 Jun 2025, 11:30 UTC292 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tizikovaPhoto

Смотрите каких художников для похода с детьми в музей мы сделалали с подругой моей мамы! Моне, Ван Гог и Пикассо ❤️ Пикассо конечно со своей любимой таксой -Лумпом, Моне в узнаваемой шляпе, а Ван Гог с рыжей бородой) Я как -то увидела подобные игрушки в музее и подумала, а как бы тоже таких сделать…) и вот что получилось) Мы сделали только троих, если кто хочет такого музейного друга своему ребенку, пиши

17

12 May 2025, 09:46 UTC323 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @artstudiolobooksPhoto

Книга мая-июня. Габсбурги: власть над миром История могучей династии, господствовавшей в Европе на протяжении почти тысячи лет, а также ее самобытной вселенной, которую она сама и создала, чтобы затем утратить на заре XX столетия. Начав скромными швабскими феодалами, в XV веке Габсбурги добились владычества над Священной Римской империей, а потом, за несколько десятилетий, — над огромной частью земного шара, от Вен

5👍3

2 May 2025, 09:08 UTC274 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, о Давиде На Amazon Prime месяц назад вышел новый сериал House of David (Дом Давида). Сериал может и не претендует на кинематографический шедевр и конечно не претендует на статус «100% достоверная история» (мы вообще такое можем сказать о Ветхом завете?), но с точки зрения картинки и сюжета, смотреть было интересно. Так что если интересует иллюстрация легенды о том, как Давид победил гиганта Голиафа камнем,

7👍2

2 May 2025, 08:58 UTC206 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Это Рембрандт?

  1. Да37%
  2. Нет63%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @artstudiolo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2025, 12:38 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

А хотите я завтра в 18:30 проведу здесь прямой эфир об испанском модерне? Ведь не только Гауди творил на рубеже XIX-XX веков и не только в Барселоне можно увидеть примеры модерна.

  1. Да, хочу!53%
  2. Возможно посмотрю в записи47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 May 2025, 08:58 UTCAnonymous Quiz38 voters

Это Рембрандт?

  1. Да37%
  2. Нет63%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 May 2025, 08:57 UTCAnonymous Quiz36 voters

Это Рембрандт?

  1. Да69%
  2. Нет31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 May 2025, 08:56 UTCAnonymous Quiz38 voters

Это Рембрандт?

  1. Да37%
  2. Нет63%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2025 to 2 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 472,433 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Art Studiolo • гид по искусству” (@artstudiolo), 219 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artstudiolo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.