Channel
@artorgasmspls
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
117subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003622198210 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @artorgasmspls |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 26 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/artorgasmspls |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 00:35 | 117 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 120 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 122 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 122 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
212 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 110 | 51.9% | |
| custom 6001427561559628365 | 29 | 13.7% | |
| custom 5303230011405266239 | 27 | 12.7% | |
| custom 5873067168223991669 | 20 | 9.43% | |
| custom 5303204323205869772 | 10 | 4.72% | |
| custom 5188521858814740903 | 8 | 3.77% | |
| custom 5283216636331970513 | 3 | 1.42% | |
| custom 5303094397812896169 | 3 | 1.42% | |
| custom 5366087085415492271 | 2 | 0.943% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 212 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
я ненавижу, когда при выборе новой вещи приходится думать о том, с чем сука ее носить. так мало вещей, которые ты надела и открылись врата подиума. неужели обязательно нужно думать об этом собирательном образе сергея зверева(((💦💦
❤10custom 51885218588147409034custom 52832166363319705133
если даша корейка и володя ххл правда начали встречаться, то это ну полный пурпурный брабус
❤9custom 51885218588147409034custom 60014275615596283653custom 53660870854154922712
150к часов на валберисе
❤12custom 53032043232058697723custom 53032300114052662393
will you still love me when I'm возвращаюсь домой с работы в 11 вечера и ем холодные макароны из кастрюли руками
❤9custom 60014275615596283656custom 53030943978128961693
Photo, posted without a caption
❤8custom 53032300114052662393custom 60014275615596283653
бля худшее что может произойти утром, это проснуться в выходной с ощущением того будто бы ты вчера бухала непросыхая
❤9custom 53032300114052662394custom 58730671682239916694
мне не стыдно за свой цифровой след 🪬🦋
❤8custom 53032300114052662395custom 60014275615596283654
мне срочно нужна любая вещь цвета тиффани в гардеробе
custom 53032300114052662394custom 58730671682239916694❤2
я не понимаю, точнее не хочу понимать, людей, которые не не верят в «навсегда», все квартиры считают временными, не приносят фикус и чашку на работу, не пытаются подружиться с одногруппниками, не вешают фотографии над кроватью, пытаясь создать атмосферу дома, у них нет «своего» бара в городе. бля зачем вы вообще, если вы не надолго тут?
❤7custom 58730671682239916696custom 60014275615596283654
никогда не вела инстаграм, но начать вести его в 2026 оч нишего? или про данную помойку забыли?🤔🤞🤞
❤9custom 53032043232058697724custom 53032300114052662393
мое любимое фото в интернете
❤8custom 60014275615596283655custom 58730671682239916694
‼️‼️лайфхак как найти хорошего мужика для тех, кто еще не нашел. собираем поисковый отряд, оцепляем новый участок, идем взявшись за руки, сужая радиус поиска. вперёд выпускаем собак
❤8custom 53032043232058697723custom 58730671682239916692
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @artorgasmspls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“s(ex) подтекст” (@artorgasmspls), 117 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artorgasmspls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.