Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for San'at tanqidchisi kundaligi(non-conformist)

Channel

San'at tanqidchisi kundaligi(non-conformist)

@artjingo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

780subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001472477902
TypeChannel
Username@artjingo
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/artjingo

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7697857776 August 2026 — 777 subscribers6 August 2026 — 777 subscribers15 August 2026 — 769 subscribers23 August 2026 — 774 subscribers31 August 2026 — 785 subscribers10 September 2026 — 776 subscribers19 September 2026 — 780 subscribers7806 August 202619 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 44 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 767–787 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 14:40780+4
10 Sept 2026, 06:01776-9
31 Aug 2026, 00:42785+11
23 Aug 2026, 16:22774+5
15 Aug 2026, 02:34769-8
6 Aug 2026, 20:03777no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:52777first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

42 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1740.5%
1023.8%
🔥921.4%
🤔511.9%
👎12.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @artjingo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 19:12 UTC222 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

She'r ko'p, lekin bironta shoir yo'q. Fojea shunda @artjingo

🔥62👎1

Signed Samandar Egamberdiyev

29 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC232 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Misrdagi Siyovush kanali qurilishiga borgan fransuz ishchilarining ruhiyatini ko'tarish uchun yozilgan she'r ekan. muallifi shoir Bornier bu she'ri uchun Fransiya Akademiyasi tomonidan mukofatlangan. She'rni o'qing, imperialistlar sharqni qanday tasavvur qilganiga guvoh bo'lasiz. Edward Saidning "Orientalizm" kitobidan @artjingo

🔥31

Signed Samandar Egamberdiyev

26 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC304 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

2

Signed Samandar Egamberdiyev

26 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC384 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Rostan nega go'zallik haqida quyg'urmay qo'ydik? @artjingo

3

Signed Samandar Egamberdiyev

24 Jul 2026, 05:18 UTC275 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Emir Kusturicadan nega doim tsiganlar haqida film suratga olasan deb so'rashganida uning javobi tahminan shunday: haligacha dunyoda tsiganlardek erkin, samimiy va o'z fikrini ochiq aytadigan xalqlarni uchratmadim deb javob bergan ekan. Quyidagi videoni ko'rib Emir Kusturicaning "Черный кошка, былий кот"(1998) filmidagi tsiganlar mafiyasi boshlig'i Дядя Гырга yodimga tushdi. Videodagi samimiyat esa yo'qori daraja. @ar

🤔5

Signed Samandar Egamberdiyev

23 Jul 2026, 20:17 UTC260 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Soleil O (1970) rej: Med Hondo O'tgan asrning yetmishinchi yillarda bu qadar satirik, anti-colonial va provokatsion film suratga olishi uchun odam rostakam telba bo'lishi kerak. Film muallifini chin san'atkor desak bo'ladi) @artjingo

👍3

Signed Samandar Egamberdiyev

23 Jul 2026, 05:25 UTC287 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Egosentrik shoirlar tarixi haqida Oljas Suleymonovdan ajoyib fikrlar: "XX asr shoirning yangi bir tipini yaratdi. Bu shoir o‘zidan avvalgi barcha shoir tiplariga xos xususiyatlarni o‘zida mujassamlashtirib, umumlashtirdi va ularni bir butun qorishma sifatida inkor etdi. Bu — egotsentrik shoir, chunki u o‘z «men»ini jahon miqyosidagi kurashlar markaziga qo‘ydi. Bunday shoir insoniyat boshidan kechirgan ming yillik na

Signed Samandar Egamberdiyev

15 Jul 2026, 05:11 UTC470 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Rumiy she'rlar bitdi. Abbas Kiorastami undan kino yaratdi. Postmodernist rejissyor Matthew Rankin esa "Universal til"(2024) filmi bilan ikki noyob ijodkorga cheksiz ehtirom ko'rsatdi. Oxirgi yillarda Ruhiy kommunikatsiya haqida o'ta yoqimli film aynan shu bo'ldi men uchun. Tavsiya qilaman. @artjingo

👍8

Signed Samandar Egamberdiyev

11 Jul 2026, 19:37 UTC546 viewsread 6 August 2026

Hukm chiqarish niyatim yo'g'-u, lekin aytmoqchimanki, barcha faylasuflar ham samimiy emas. Ularning-da o'z zamon va makonlari, ya'ni o'z konteksti bor. Biroq manavi fransuz Jak Lacanning falsafasi asosida paydo bo'lgan 3 ta qoida men uchun samimiy tuyildi. Shuning uchun sizlar bilan bo'lishishni lozim topdim. 1.Desire is the desire of the big Other. (Istak bu katta Boshqaning istagidir) 2.Play around with the big Ot

Signed Samandar Egamberdiyev

11 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC446 views8 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Ehtimol, absurdizmning eng muhim sabog‘i shundaki, hayotdagi noaniqlik uni ma’nosiz qilib qo‘ymaydi. Aksincha, vaqtimizning cheklanganligi tanlovlarimiz, munosabatlarimiz va hayotiy tajribalarimizni qadrli qiladigan asosiy omil bo‘lishi mumkin. Sizif o‘z toshini tog‘ cho‘qqisiga ko‘tarishda davom etgani kabi, biz ham oldinga harakat qilishda davom etamiz. Kurashning o‘zi hayot hikoyasining bir qismiga aylanadi. Va,

👍62

Signed Samandar Egamberdiyev

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @artjingo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“San'at tanqidchisi kundaligi(non-conformist)” (@artjingo), 780 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artjingo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.