4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,524–8,553 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 11:53
8,527
-22
7 Aug 2026, 13:36
8,549
-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:01
8,550
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:52
8,550
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
27
Links
32
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,018 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
366
36.0%
❤
309
30.4%
👏
101
9.92%
🤝
85
8.35%
⚡
29
2.85%
🔥
25
2.46%
❤🔥
24
2.36%
😍
19
1.87%
🍾
17
1.67%
👨💻
8
0.786%
😁
7
0.688%
🥰
7
0.688%
🎉
6
0.589%
💘
6
0.589%
🤡
5
0.491%
🤪
2
0.196%
🙈
1
0.098%
🙏
1
0.098%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,018reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2024 to 16 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 20 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @artifusrus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 September 2024 to 16 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚩 Artifus Turns 3 🎉
Artifus — 3 года развития
В этом году сообщество Artifus отметило три года с момента начала разработки проекта — три года идей, экспериментов, роста и совместного создания.
Спасибо каждому, кто с нами на этом пути c первых дней.
За это время Artifus прошёл путь от концепции и первых прототипов до формирующейся Web3-экосистемы с собственными продуктами и технологиями.
То, что начиналось как ид…
🚩 С Новым годом от команды Artifus!
Друзья, спасибо каждому из вас за этот год. Мы искренне благодарны всем, кто поддерживает нас, верит в миссию Artifus и помогает развитию платформы — доверием, участием и вкладом в общее дело. Именно вы даёте нам энергию двигаться вперёд.
Весь прошедший год команда посвятила фундаментальным разработкам сервисов, которые с помощью уникальных технологических решений выводят хайринг…
ArtiTap Airdrop: обновление по получению токенов 🤑RTS
Многие пользователи не знакомы с Web3 и не смогли получить токены через кошелёк. Мы решили упростить процесс:
• Объём токенов, выделенный на аирдроп, остаётся без изменений.
• Пользователи, которые не смогли получить токены, получат их в виде баланса в игре 😏ArtiTap — для покупок внутри игры.
• При желании вы сможете вывести 🤑 токены на кошелёк в любое вре…
Продление получения ArtiTap Airdrop!
Мы рады сообщить, что срок получения токенов RTS продлевается минимум на 2 недели! У вас есть дополнительное время, чтобы забрать свои токены до новой даты окончания.
Если вы ещё не успели забрать свой аирдроп, не упустите шанс! Убедитесь, что вы выполняете все условия для получения токенов.
Следите за обновлениями!
Настоятельно рекомендуем использовать ПК-версию платформы Artifus и ПК-версию вашего браузера для получения эйрдропа. Это уменьшит количество ошибок, которые могут возникать при использовании мобильных версий кошельков.
🪧 Важное объявление!
Для удобства получения токенов через эйрдроп, мы решили покрыть комиссию, необходимую для получения ArtiTap Airdrop пользователями, которые соответствуют критериям.
Чтобы воспользоваться этой возможностью, нужно пройти проверку check eligibility в разделе эйрдроп. Те, у кого есть баланс эйрдроп поинтов больше 0, могут обратиться в техподдержку с просьбой получить токены сети Polygon для оплаты …
Важное объявление!
🚩 Artifus Labs выделила 10 000 000 утилити-токенов $RTS🤑 для распространения среди пользователей игрового проекта Web3 ArtiTap в поддержку развития проекта. Этот проект станет первым в очереди на размещение на сервисе Artifus Play — платформе каталога для приложений Web3, веб-приложений и мини-игр, которая позволяет запускать игры и приложения непосредственно на платформе Artifus.
Airdrop проводи…
🤘 Артифусу исполняется 2 года!
Два года инноваций, роста и сообщества!
За последние два года мы стали больше, чем просто идеей, больше, чем черновиком, больше, чем MVP и больше, чем демо-версией. Мы превратились в многогранную экосистему, построенную на наших собственных продуктах, разработав уникальную сеть фирменных смарт-контрактов, которые наделяют Artifus собственными функциями Web3 . Эти инновации упрощают воз…
🎄✨ С Рождеством и Новым 2025 годом! ✨🎄
Дорогие друзья, партнеры и пользователи,
Прошедший год стал для Артифус Лабс годом роста и невероятных достижений! Вместе с вами мы расширились, освоили новые горизонты и развили несколько ключевых направлений:
🌟 🤖 ArtiTap — наше Web3 мини-приложение в Telegram, которое покорило сердца более 370 000 игроков на пике популярности, заключило свыше 50 партнерств и даже оказалось …
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @artifusrus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2024 to 16 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,039,179 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@artifusrus named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@wordboox_ru named in 10 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@artifuslab named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@artifuslabs named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Artifus RU” (@artifusrus), 8,527 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artifusrus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.