9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -159. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,983–16,190 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 11:06
16,007
-27
11 Aug 2026, 10:16
16,034
-32
10 Aug 2026, 09:50
16,066
-23
9 Aug 2026, 09:52
16,089
-10
8 Aug 2026, 09:56
16,099
-17
7 Aug 2026, 07:55
16,116
-48
6 Aug 2026, 08:20
16,164
-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:19
16,166
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:24
16,166
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
29
Links
31
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2,243 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
838
37.4%
❤
810
36.1%
👏
166
7.40%
🔥
114
5.08%
🤯
88
3.92%
🥰
70
3.12%
🤝
62
2.76%
😁
37
1.65%
😍
23
1.03%
✍
18
0.802%
❤🔥
12
0.535%
💯
4
0.178%
⚡
1
0.045%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,243reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2024 to 16 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
41
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 18 we hold a reading for · 56%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @artifus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 September 2024 to 16 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚩 Artifus Turns 3 🎉
Three Years of Building
This year, the Artifus community marked three years since the beginning of the project’s development — three years of ideas, experimentation, growth, and building together.
Thank you to everyone who has been with us since the very beginning.
Over this time, Artifus has evolved from an early concept and initial prototypes into a growing Web3 ecosystem with its own produc…
🚩 Happy New Year from the Artifus Team!
Friends, thank you to every one of you for this year. We are deeply grateful to everyone who supports us, believes in the mission of Artifus, and contributes to the growth of the platform through trust, participation, and meaningful involvement. Your support is what gives us the energy to keep moving forward.
Throughout the past year, our team has been fully focused on founda…
🥚Happy Easter from 🚩Artifus Labs!
Wishing you a season full of fresh mints, solid gains, and meaningful connections — on-chain and off.
May your journey through this spring be as rewarding as your favorite drop, and may every block bring new beginnings.
Stay decentralized!
ArtiTap Airdrop: 🤑 RTS Token Claim Update
Many users are not familiar with Web3 and couldn’t claim their tokens via wallet. We’re making it easier:
• The total amount of airdrop tokens remains unchanged.
• Users who didn’t claim their tokens will receive them as in-game balance in 😏ArtiTap, usable for in-game purchases.
• You’ll be able to withdraw 🤑 tokens to your wallet at any time if needed.
• For…
ArtiTap Airdrop Extension!
We’re excited to announce that the RTS token claim period has been extended for at least 2 more weeks! You now have additional time to claim your tokens before the new deadline.
If you haven’t claimed your airdrop yet, don’t miss this chance! Make sure you meet all the eligibility requirements to claim your tokens.
Stay tuned for updates and make sure to claim your tokens before time run…
We strongly recommend to our users to use MetaMask as the main wallet for ArtiTap airdrop claiming, due to the large amount of errors from other wallets like Trust Wallet, Rabby Wallet, or OKx Wallet.
We strongly recommend using the desktop version of the Artifus platform and the desktop version of your browser to claim the airdrop. This will reduce the number of errors that can occur when using mobile wallet versions.
🪧Important announcement!
To make it easier to receive tokens through the airdrop, we've decided to cover the network fee for users who meet the criteria to receive the ArtiTap Airdrop.
To take advantage of this, you need to complete the check eligibility in the airdrop section. Users with a positive airdrop points balance can contact support to request Polygon network tokens to cover the fee for receiving the 🤑RTS …
Important Announcement!
🚩Artifus Labs has allocated 10,000,000 utility tokens $RTS 🤑for distribution to users of the Web3 gaming project ArtiTap in support of the project’s development. This project will be the first in line to be listed on the Artifus Play service—a catalog platform for Web3 apps, web apps and mini-app games that lets you launch games and applications directly on the Artifus platform.
The airdrop …
🤘Artifus Turns 2!
Two Years of Innovation, Growth, and Community!
Over the past two years, we have become more than just an idea, more than a draft, more than an MVP, and more than a demo version. We have evolved into a multifaceted ecosystem built upon our own products, developing a unique network of proprietary smart contracts that empower Artifus with its own Web3 functionalities. These innovations simplify monet…
🎄✨ Merry Christmas and Happy New Year 2025! ✨🎄
Dear friends, partners, and users, this past year has been one of growth and incredible achievements for Artifus Labs! Together with you, we expanded, explored new horizons, and developed several key directions:
🌟 ArtiTap — our Web3 mini-application in Telegram that captured the hearts of over 370,000 players at its peak, established more than 50 partnerships, and even…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @artifus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 850,070 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@artifus named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@artifuslab named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@artifuslabs named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Artifus” (@artifus), 16,007 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artifus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
