Channel
@artesh_seyed_ali
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
278subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001728141021 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @artesh_seyed_ali |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/artesh_seyed_ali |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 278 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 278 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
دقیق بخون، دقیق جواب بده. تاکید میکنم که برنده به تعداد رای نیست. مهم اینه کی بتونه جنگ بالای قدرت رو ببره
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed M.M6867
چیکار کردید رفقا؟🙂
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed M.M6867
#انتخابات 🔴 به چه کسی رای دادید؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed M.M6867
به چه کسی رای دادید؟🔥🩸
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed M.M6867
✅ به نظر شما چه کسی فردا رییس جمهور کشورمان میشه؟ (نظرسنجی بصورت ناشناس انجام میشه و کسی نمیبینه شما رأی دادید)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed M.M6867
یک نظر سنجی در مورد اینکه رای دادید یا ندادید
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed M.M6867
رای ؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed M.M6867
امروز من به.......... رای دادم
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed M.M6867
به کدام نامزد رای دادید یا خواهید داد؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed M.M6867
چیکار کردید؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed M.M6867
در دور دوم انتخابات به چه کسی رای میدهید؟!
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed M.M6867
رای شما؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed M.M6867
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @artesh_seyed_ali. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 19 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
دقیق بخون، دقیق جواب بده. تاکید میکنم که برنده به تعداد رای نیست. مهم اینه کی بتونه جنگ بالای قدرت رو ببره
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
چیکار کردید رفقا؟🙂
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#انتخابات 🔴 به چه کسی رای دادید؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
به چه کسی رای دادید؟🔥🩸
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
✅ به نظر شما چه کسی فردا رییس جمهور کشورمان میشه؟ (نظرسنجی بصورت ناشناس انجام میشه و کسی نمیبینه شما رأی دادید)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
یک نظر سنجی در مورد اینکه رای دادید یا ندادید
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2024 to 5 July 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 980,310 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نظر سنجی های انتخاباتی” (@artesh_seyed_ali), 278 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artesh_seyed_ali.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.