Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for артемос и мысли

Channel

артемос и мысли

@artemos1356ch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

26subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003949006140
TypeChannel
Username@artemos1356ch
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 28 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/artemos1356ch

Growth

252625.510 August 2026 — 25 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26 subscribers10 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25–26 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 15:5826+1
11 Aug 2026, 10:0425no change
10 Aug 2026, 22:1525first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
122.2%
avg views ÷ 26 subscribers
Avg views / post
31.8
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held18 (28 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total572
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1076.9%
17.69%
❤‍🔥17.69%
🥰17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC10 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

ладно вот теперь прикольно (стим меняет цвет в зависимости от игры, konsole и gtk меняется после перезагрузки)

🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Этот пост я написал из-за подобных комментариев тиктокоидов, такая же логика: аргументы приходится вытряхивать и так далее Вот и думайте (не забудьте подписаться)

🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC14 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Почему Rust база? Много кто пишет, что Rust говно, потому что он якобы "ведёт человека за ручку" и прочее. Естественно, это говорят люди, что, скорее всего, не освоили сам язык, либо, что ещё более вероятно, просто не знают, как устроена безопасность в языке. Начать стоит с того, что плохого в том, что компилятор не компилирует заведомо небезопасный код и говорит о том, что не так и как это скорее всего исправить.

🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 00:28 UTC20 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Передовые Linux технологии: bcache и bcachefs Недавно я на ночь решил оставить Gentoo компилироваться, но, к сожалению встретился с такой историей: не хватало места на моём маленьком SSD (он 256Гб в себя всего вмещает), зато был HDD на 1Тб (я о нём писал, сейчас всё с ним нормально). Проблема главная была в том, что игра Counter-Strike 2 весит дохуя (55 гигов и ещё 5 гигов из мастерской, 60 гигов в итоге). Я, к сож

❤‍🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC25 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#дауны @ я че то пизжу и спрашиваю, ну например как здесь: "ROCm и ZLUDA чем хуже чем тот же CUDA?" @ мне в ответ высирают клоуна @ я спрашиваю, чем я задел душонку человека: "задел чем то?" @ мне в ответ: ТЫ ВСЕМ ТАК ОТВЕЧАЕШЬ??? ТЫ ВЫСОКОМЕРНЫЙ ТЫ НЕ ПОНИМАЕШЬ!!! Ну и вот как людей даунами не считать? @ThinkLinux_bot.ARTEMOS.ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ

🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC34 viewsread 11 August 2026

Наверное это пост к продолжению поста про яблоко Недавно я столкнулся с такими аргументами: "Яблоко не пройдёт, смысл за него голосовать?", "Даже если оно пройдёт, то что оно сделает?" Начнём с того, что яблоко не проходит по двум причинам: 1. То, что мы живём в РФии, здесь понятно кому отдадут 67% голосов 2. Из-за такой ебнутой логики, вы не голосуете потому что кто-то другой не голосует - это какой то бред. Если

4 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC39 viewsread 11 August 2026

И всё таки я тут очень хорошую мысль сформулировал - приватность есть оружие автономии. Если мы даём меньше информации, например, какому нибудь сайту -> слепок личность не такой точный -> из-за того что слепок личности не столь точный предиктивная модель может ошибаться -> нами сложнее манипулировать и замыкать в инфопузырь. Это работает не только с алгоритмом но и в целом где угодно. В обществе тоже. @ThinkLinux_

4 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC28 viewsread 11 August 2026

а вообще я немного дополнил идеями от своего знакомого, что тоже не любит ранок по +- тем же причинам.

4 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC28 viewsread 11 August 2026

Рынок ПОЛНОЕ ГОВНИЩЕ. Почему? Для меня главной ценностью является свобода как автономность. Из чего истекают и мои другие мысли, например, почему я за Open Source. И почему я считаю, что рынок, то есть рыночная экономика, является угрозой для приватности и автономности. Начну с той мысли, что приватность есть оружие автономности, потому что именно приватностью мы решаем что передавать иным лицам, и чем меньше информ

3 Aug 2026, 23:19 UTC41 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Моя жажда познания. В целом я эту черту и раннее замечал, но сформировал достаточно нормально только сейчас. Это продолжение к первому посту о том, зачем этот телеграмм канал нужен, но не суть. Тут я буду говорить о себе. Мысль только сейчас появилась по поводу этого. Как по мне это довольно нужная шестерёнка, что меня довольно хорошо описывает. Я буду говорить о жажде, жажде познания. Мне всегда не было достаточно

🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @artemos1356ch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,146,055 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“артемос и мысли” (@artemos1356ch), 26 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artemos1356ch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.