Channel
@artemkushnir
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
532subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001143438705 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @artemkushnir |
| Created | 13 August 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/artemkushnir |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 532 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 531 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 531 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
258 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 50 | 19.4% | |
| 🔥 | 44 | 17.1% | |
| 👍 | 43 | 16.7% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 9.30% | |
| 💯 | 20 | 7.75% | |
| 🍌 | 19 | 7.36% | |
| 🤔 | 12 | 4.65% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 3.10% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 2.71% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 2.33% | |
| 🎄 | 4 | 1.55% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 1.55% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 1.55% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 1.16% | |
| 🎅 | 3 | 1.16% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.775% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.775% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.388% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.388% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.388% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 258reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2025 to 23 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
про "смерть автора" и Франсуа Озона -- на своём 24 по счёту (кажется) фильме Франсуа Озон наконец проникся идеями Ролана Барта и явил миру художественное высказывание, в котором самого Озона - того, которого мы любим, знаем и вожделеем - по сути и нет. ну не считать же пару гомосексуальных кадров и могилку араба в конце, слишком мелкие и незначительные детали - вот тем самым довлеющим надо всем автором? потому что р…
❤6🔥4🌭1👍1👏1
Ушел из жизни Сергей Шерегов. В последнее время он был более известен как первый председатель Счетной палаты Тюменской области, что, безусловно, не отражало его реальную роль в региональной политике 90-х годов. Счетная палата была потом, в 1997 году, а до этого Сергей Шерегов возглавлял Ленинский район Тюмени. Надо ли говорить, что район тогда и управа сейчас это принципиально разные административные единицы, которы…
👍7❤1🍌1
SUMMARY по замедлению Телеги, продвижению MAX и вот этому всему Ну вы все знаете, что происходит в последние 3 дня. Как-то так совпали сразу много событий, которые чисто по теории вероятности не должны совпасть в одной точке: 1) происходит что-то непонятное с Телеграмом 2) появилась возможность для всех создавать каналы в MAX 3) появились рассылки админам каналов в Телеграме, что надо создавать каналы в MAX 4) на эт…
💯5👍4🤔4❤1🍌1👌1🙏1
Роскомнадзор давно не выдавал классных инфоповодов и сегодня ему это удалось — я про блокировку Телеграма. И тут в общем-то можно паниковать, а можно посмотреть на ситуацию объективно: о блокировке Телеграма мы узнаем из Телеграма и обсуждаем её в Телеграме. И тут 2 вывода: 1. Никакой альтернативной по охвату и скорости распространения информации площадки в стране нет. Убить её — значит убить крупные политические…
💯7👍4🔥3🍌1🤔1
Кажется, понял суть своего внутреннего бунта против искусственного интеллекта. Мне нравится работать головой. А кажется, как раз это моё любимое занятие у меня пытаются отобрать. Но нет, я своё не отдам )))
👍12💯6🍌1
Дисклеймер от меня: я провёл лучший день рождения за много лет (43-й по счету) и даже получил вот это лучшее поздравление на этот счёт ))) Автор текста Данила Фатин: Сначала мне по него Литкевич рассказывал. "Ты чо, это такой классный чувак! Вам обязательно надо познакомиться!". Потом мы с этим классным чуваком как-то зафрендились в ЖЖ. Он первым обратил внимание на мой current music и сказал, что он крутой. Спуст…
🔥17❤9❤🔥3👍2🍌1
👆👆👆 Вот я что-то такое подозревал, увидев сегодня в лентах обилие прогнозов от персонажа
🍌1
Хедлайнер борьбы с иностранными интернет-сервисами Андрей Свинцов Госдумы (ЛДПР), ежедневно дающий прогнозы то на блокировку (WhatsApp), то на отказ от этой идеи (Telegram), в действительности плохо владеет ситуацией и высказывает в СМИ исключительно личное мнение. Его резонансные заявления, сделанные по принципу «лишь бы процитировали», направлены на одного адресата – лидера ЛДПР Леонида Слуцкого, который места Свин…
🍌1
Да что они знают о снеге в своём Эльзасе? Эту Бугатти бы к нам во дворы сейчас )
🔥5🍌1
А вы как оцениваете уборку снега этой зимой?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🍌1
Пришла пора вспомнить про снег. Потому что его в этом году очень много. И вот что радует — за многие снежные зимы его наконец убирают! Да, обилие техники порой мешает передвижению, но душа радуется, снежных колдобин почти нет, все шуршат, работают, дороги чистые )
❤4🎄4🎅3🍌1
Мысли вслух. Мошенники используют алфавит и буквы, видимо пора принимать радикальные меры. Давайте запретим алфавит, так как наша борьба с мошенниками не очень эффективна. А так мы их точно победим.
😁17👍3❤🔥2💯2🍌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @artemkushnir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А вы как оцениваете уборку снега этой зимой?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2025 to 23 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 737,323 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Артём Кушнир” (@artemkushnir), 532 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artemkushnir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.