Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Артем Садула

@artem_sadula

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

344subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001928970657
TypeChannel
Username@artem_sadula
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/artem_sadula

Growth

3423443437 August 2026 — 342 subscribers8 August 2026 — 342 subscribers14 August 2026 — 344 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 342–344 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:48344+2
8 Aug 2026, 07:01342no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:45342first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.4%
avg views ÷ 344 subscribers
Avg views / post
101
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held5 (3 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total505
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
0s
Average length
0s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍838.1%
💯419.0%
🔥314.3%
🫡314.3%
29.52%
🆒14.76%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC43 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Продолжаем практику выездных встреч с жителями. На этот раз работали в посёлке Лесные Поляны. Вместе с уполномоченным главы Городского округа Пушкинский Элеонорой Чистяковой, депутатом Совета депутатов Анной Дунаевой, социальным координатором Государственного фонда «Защитники Отечества» Лидией Шавлиновой, представителями администрации и профильных служб обсудили с жителями самые актуальные вопросы. Такой формат поз

👍2

7 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC226 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Поздравили работников строительной отрасли с профессиональным праздником Совместно с главой Городского округа Пушкинский Максимом Валерьевичем Красноцветовым и депутатом Московской областной Думы Михаилом Жданом приняли участие в торжественном мероприятии, посвящённом Дню строителя. Праздник объединил представителей строительного сообщества нашего округа. От имени Совета депутатов Городского округа Пушкинский вручи

👍2

4 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC73 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня вместе с депутатами Совета депутатов Любовью Дмитриевой, Ириной Дурягиной, Василием Коржевым и Владимиром Савенко, социальным координатором Государственного фонда «Защитники Отечества» Лидией Шавлиновой, представителем Общественной палаты Юрием Ковалёвым, представителями МКУ «Тарасовское» и управляющей компании встретились с жителями домов №19, 21 и 23 по улице Богданова. После обращения жителей вместе с ним

🔥3👍2

4 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC72 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Провели встречу с жителями СНТ «Зелёный Бор» в посёлке Лесные Поляны Сегодня вместе с уполномоченным главы Городского округа Пушкинский Элеонорой Чистяковой, депутатом Совета депутатов Яной Гальциной, представителями МКУ «Тарасовское», председателем СНТ и жителями провели выездную встречу. Основной темой обсуждения стали вопросы безопасности дорожного движения. Жители обратились с предложениями по установке искусс

👍2💯2🫡1🆒1

3 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC91 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Провели повторную встречу с жителями на проезде Маяковского, 11 Ранее мы уже встречались с жителями этого дома в рамках серии дворовых встреч. Тогда были обозначены общие вопросы по содержанию дома и прилегающей территории. Сегодня совместно с депутатами Ириной Дурягиной и Василием Коржевым, а также представителем управляющей компании провели повторную встречу, чтобы детально разобрать конкретные проблемные точки.

2💯2🫡2

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @artem_sadula. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 832,709 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Артем Садула” (@artem_sadula), 344 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artem_sadula.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.