Π ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊ Π΄Π»Ρ Π±Π»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΡΠ° @Boroda44tv π
π₯4π1π1π1
![Telegram profile photo for π₯[D.GRAMM]π¨](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/dd/ddb4698f40aab055ac5330de0ead4322c483dfe91949532e83707010e607bb69.jpg)
Channel
@artdenisgramm
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
239subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001667150011 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @artdenisgramm |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/artdenisgramm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 239 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 237 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 237 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
173 reactions across 20 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 62 | 35.8% | |
| π | 23 | 13.3% | |
| β€ | 13 | 7.51% | |
| π | 13 | 7.51% | |
| π» | 9 | 5.20% | |
| π | 6 | 3.47% | |
| π€£ | 6 | 3.47% | |
| π | 5 | 2.89% | |
| π | 5 | 2.89% | |
| π | 4 | 2.31% | |
| π | 4 | 2.31% | |
| π³ | 4 | 2.31% | |
| π | 4 | 2.31% | |
| πΎ | 3 | 1.73% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 2 | 1.16% | |
| π― | 2 | 1.16% | |
| π | 1 | 0.578% | |
| πΎ | 1 | 0.578% | |
| π | 1 | 0.578% | |
| π | 1 | 0.578% | |
| 4 further kinds | 4 | 2.31% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 173 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @artdenisgramm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 April 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Π ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊ Π΄Π»Ρ Π±Π»ΠΎΠ³Π΅ΡΠ° @Boroda44tv π
π₯4π1π1π1
Photo, posted without a caption
π₯3β€2π1
Video, posted without a caption
β€2β€βπ₯2π2π1π₯1
Video, posted without a caption
π₯7π³2π1πΎ1
π
π9π₯7π2
Video, posted without a caption
π₯4π2π2π1π1
ΠΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ) β½οΈ
π₯6π3π»1
ΠΠΈΡΠ²Π° ΡΠΌΠΎΠ² βΎ
π€£4π2π―1π₯1π1
ΠΠΎΠ΅Π·Π΄ΠΊΠ° Π·Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΊΡΡΠ³ πΎ
π₯6β€4πΎ2
Video, posted without a caption
π6π1π―1
ΠΡ ΡΠΆ ΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΈ
π2π2β€1π1
ΠΠΎΠ» ΡΡΠΎ Π»Π°Π²Π° π₯
π₯11β€2π1π»1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @artdenisgramm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ₯[D.GRAMM]π¨β (@artdenisgramm), 239 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artdenisgramm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.