Channel
@art_of_dev
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
127subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002004571277 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @art_of_dev |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/art_of_dev |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 127 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 129 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 129 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 14 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
132 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 56 | 42.4% | |
| 😁 | 20 | 15.2% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 14.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 5.30% | |
| 🦄 | 6 | 4.55% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 3.79% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 3.03% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 3.03% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 1.52% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.52% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.52% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 1.52% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.758% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.758% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.758% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2025 to 17 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @art_of_dev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 October 2025 to 17 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
AI Personality Tests: Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude Researchers at the University of Luxembourg ran standard personality and mental-health tests on major LLMs. 🧠 Grok: most extroverted and overall psychologically healthy – not perfect, but the most stable. 🌀 Gemini: tortured soul, with the most severe issues: high neuroticism, depression, autistic traits, and OCD. 🤖 ChatGPT landed in the middle: fewer proble…
👍5😁5
Actual english culture 101 😁
Culture shock is when I call a clinic to make an appointment, and they kindly say, "Our reception is busy, give us your number, and we'll call you back." After a while, I found a translation into Eastern European English, which translates to “Fuck off, we can't help you."
😁8
The latest nano banana pro is just insane.. ᴀʀᴛ, source
🔥4🤩2
Actual map of modern infrastructure sustainability, based on recent months @art_of_dev, source
🔥4😁4
And the biggest thing (at least for me) Anthropic has launched structured outputs in the Claude API 🔥 https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/build-with-claude/structured-outputs This is big for anyone who needs reliable results from LLMs @art_of_dev
🔥7🤗2
Here's another Level 2 opportunity for entrepreneurs! Apple now officially supports Mini Apps within its ecosystem. Developers receive an 85% revenue share. The main catch right now is if there will be some traffic share and visibility for such mini-apps. @art_of_dev #level2 #layer2
🔥4
What a time to be alive! 😅
Photo, posted without a caption
😁3😢2🤷♂1
Mercenaries & missionaries Recently I asked Matteo, the founder of Eightsleep, for his advice on hiring the founding team of Rork. He said: "Learn if a person is a missionary or a mercenary. You don't want to partner with mercenaries." His words struck me as a non-obvious truth. Obviously, you want a team that will stay for the long term. But the idea was that great work comes from missionaries. I always tried to …
🔥7❤2
The volume of AI traffic is tiny (currently at ~0.07% on avg), but growing 100% year-over-year. This tells you two things: → You can’t ignore something doubling every year → On the web traffic is still king (but for how long?) Do you already use any type of AEO/GEO to gain that traffic? @art_of_dev
🤔4🔥3
New Level2 opportunity has just been released Slack work objects is available to everyone – you can now build dynamic, interactive apps on Slack, turning static previews into rich and actionable mini-apps. Each time when you have a huge platform providing distribution among their users, it's a big opportunity, like it was in the early days of Google Play. And now it opens for B2B projects on Slack. What value cou…
🔥5✍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @art_of_dev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Art of Dev” (@art_of_dev), 127 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/art_of_dev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.