Channel
@artTech_ekb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Declared links · Cite this entry
429subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002431570525 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @artTech_ekb |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/artTech_ekb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 429 | +3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 426 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 427 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 427 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
90 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 58 | 64.4% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 20.0% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 10.0% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.22% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.11% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.11% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Защита учебного проекта после 6 месяцев обучения на дизайнера интерьеров - и вот такой восхитительный, профессиональный, продуманный проект получился у нашей студентки Дарьи @DaryaSokolovaart 🤍
❤11👏2😍1
Продолжаем знакомить вас с нашей командой, а именно с преподавателями - людьми, которые непосредственно взращивают ваш талант, окружая вас своей заботой, и делясь своими знаниями! Итак, знакомьтесь: наша очаровательная Даша Малиновская, преподаватель по UX/UI-дизайну 😍 В видео Даша поделилась своим опытом и миссией 💛
❤10🔥4😍3
Любите рисовать, но не знаете, как это монетизировать? Разобрали пять направлений в иллюстрации - куда можно двигаться, если вы мечтаете сделать свое хобби профессией 💙
❤5🔥3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤10
В тему прошедшего выпускного: хотим поделиться с вами работами наших двух прекрасных UX/UI-дизайнеров: 🪄 https://project23173736.tilda.ws/ - сайт, разработанный Цибиной Катей @sharkoshpitz 🪄https://stretch-accurate-cymophane.tilda.ws/page145541666.html - сайт, разработанный Ходаковской Варварой @hdkvskaya Обе студентки проделали колоссальную работу, и создали такие красивые, качественные, профессиональные сайты, к…
🔥11😍5❤3❤🔥1🤩1🥰1
Еще из важных новостей: Смена поколений… Наш, всеми такой любимый, Бананчелли (названный в честь величайшего художника Сандро Боттичелли) весной дал нам бананы, а теперь отцветает. Такова природа банана… 🌴Он был чудесным, добрым другом в нашей школе, и всегда радостно приветствовал наших гостей и студентов. И так, как мы не представляем нашу школу без банана, то у нас уже есть его преемник - Бананчелли II Которог…
❤19
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @artTech_ekb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 295,125 of 1,629,518 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@artTech_ekb named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“artTech Екатеринбург” (@artTech_ekb), 429 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artTech_ekb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.