Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🔸ART4FRIENDS🔸

@art4friends

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

329subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001795986994
TypeChannel
Username@art4friends
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/art4friends

Growth

3297 Aug 2026, 01:01 — 329 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 11:21 — 329 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:017 Aug 2026, 11:21
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 328–330 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 11:21329no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:01329first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

104 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👀1918.3%
custom 53098878163044498841615.4%
🔥1413.5%
custom 528742017665914737398.65%
custom 532130028743926299487.69%
custom 527641223131405530376.73%
custom 531657101734525994276.73%
custom 531678814082697061976.73%
🗿54.81%
custom 533257068964585608943.85%
🥰43.85%
custom 527597015033027631521.92%
custom 527623123280226653921.92%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 24 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Mar 2026, 19:29 UTC197 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Оборотная сторона картины в раме. Корнелис Норбертус Гисбрехтс 1668—1672 Национальный музей искусств Дании. В XVII веке многие нидерландские художники увлекались иллюзионистским натюрмортом, стремясь изобразить реальность столь достоверно, чтобы нарисованное казалось настоящим. Эта картина была приобретена у Корнелиуса Гисбрехтса Фредериком III для Королевской кунсткамеры. Полотно должно было экспонироваться присл

🔥5👀3custom 53213002874392629942🗿1custom 52759701503302763151custom 52764122313140553031custom 53165710173452599421

23 Mar 2026, 20:03 UTC135 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В мастерской художника Константин Маковский 1881 год Государственная Третьяковская галерея

custom 53098878163044498845custom 53165710173452599422👀1custom 52874201766591473731custom 53213002874392629941

22 Mar 2026, 16:50 UTC123 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Из весёленького🧐 Неизвестный художник второй половины XVIII века Портрет дамы с ребенком Период создания: 1760-1770-е

👀8custom 53167881408269706195custom 53165710173452599423custom 52764122313140553032custom 52762312328022665391custom 52874201766591473731custom 53325706896458560891

21 Mar 2026, 16:21 UTC108 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

На картине…

  1. Утиная семья0%
  2. Девочка88%
  3. Охотничья собака12%
  4. Лошадь0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Mar 2026, 16:18 UTC101 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что там на картине❓

🥰3custom 53098878163044498842👀1custom 52762312328022665391custom 53213002874392629941custom 53325706896458560891

19 Mar 2026, 14:09 UTC99 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Кого не ждали на картине Репина❔

  1. Школьника29%
  2. Священника6%
  3. Политического ссыльного42%
  4. Почтальона23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Mar 2026, 14:07 UTC94 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Не ждали» Илья Репин 1884–1888 Государственная Третьяковская Галерея

👀2custom 52874201766591473732custom 52759701503302763151custom 53213002874392629941

18 Mar 2026, 15:46 UTC101 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Для чего понадобились деньги Брюллову и Жуковскому❔

  1. На покупку мастерской в Риме32%
  2. На постройку «римских» терм в Санкт-Петербурге16%
  3. На выкуп крепостного крестьянина32%
  4. На экспедицию в Египет21%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Mar 2026, 15:38 UTC100 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Этот портрет был создан по инициативе Карла Брюллова и Василия Жуковского. Им срочно понадобились деньги, причем сумма внушительная, поэтому работу предстояло разыграть в лотерее с участием царской семьи. Еще больше интересного в ART4FRIENDS в MAX ✅

🔥2👀1🗿1custom 52764122313140553031custom 53098878163044498841custom 53213002874392629941

17 Mar 2026, 16:20 UTC106 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Кто автор картины❔

  1. Виктор Васнецов48%
  2. Василий Перов17%
  3. Иван Билибин14%
  4. Аполлинарий Васнецов21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Mar 2026, 16:17 UTC104 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ИВАН-ЦАРЕВИЧ НА СЕРОМ ВОЛКЕ 1879, Государственная Третьяковская Галерея

custom 53325706896458560892👀1custom 52874201766591473731

16 Mar 2026, 18:11 UTC101 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Итак, на фотографии…

  1. Валентин Серов17%
  2. Михаил Врубель21%
  3. Константин Коровин33%
  4. Илья Репин29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @art4friends. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Mar 2026, 16:21 UTCAnonymous Quiz34 voters

На картине…

  1. Утиная семья0%
  2. Девочка88%
  3. Охотничья собака12%
  4. Лошадь0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Mar 2026, 14:09 UTCAnonymous Quiz31 voters

Кого не ждали на картине Репина❔

  1. Школьника29%
  2. Священника6%
  3. Политического ссыльного42%
  4. Почтальона23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Mar 2026, 15:46 UTCAnonymous Quiz19 voters

Для чего понадобились деньги Брюллову и Жуковскому❔

  1. На покупку мастерской в Риме32%
  2. На постройку «римских» терм в Санкт-Петербурге16%
  3. На выкуп крепостного крестьянина32%
  4. На экспедицию в Египет21%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Mar 2026, 16:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz29 voters

Кто автор картины❔

  1. Виктор Васнецов48%
  2. Василий Перов17%
  3. Иван Билибин14%
  4. Аполлинарий Васнецов21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Mar 2026, 18:11 UTCAnonymous Quiz24 voters

Итак, на фотографии…

  1. Валентин Серов17%
  2. Михаил Врубель21%
  3. Константин Коровин33%
  4. Илья Репин29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Mar 2026, 09:54 UTCAnonymous Quiz30 voters

Что же я спрятала за смайликом, вспомните❔

  1. Легко, там четвертый мишка43%
  2. Прекрасный пень33%
  3. Очевидно, куст малины10%
  4. Конечно, вход в берлогу13%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 24 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 648,195 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔸ART4FRIENDS🔸” (@art4friends), 329 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/art4friends.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.