Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 43 days, net +866. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,801–18,987 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 11:02
18,835
+17
17 Sept 2026, 03:21
18,818
+6
15 Sept 2026, 05:21
18,812
-38
13 Sept 2026, 11:38
18,850
+35
11 Sept 2026, 18:57
18,815
+111
9 Sept 2026, 03:58
18,704
+179
5 Sept 2026, 20:41
18,525
-19
3 Sept 2026, 16:39
18,544
-4
2 Sept 2026, 07:24
18,548
-12
1 Sept 2026, 08:28
18,560
+44
31 Aug 2026, 05:57
18,516
+82
30 Aug 2026, 06:44
18,434
+98
29 Aug 2026, 06:35
18,336
-12
28 Aug 2026, 07:57
18,348
-1
27 Aug 2026, 10:09
18,349
+4
26 Aug 2026, 10:12
18,345
+22
25 Aug 2026, 08:56
18,323
+16
24 Aug 2026, 06:48
18,307
+73
22 Aug 2026, 12:27
18,234
+92
21 Aug 2026, 01:53
18,142
first reading
Engagement
56 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.41%
avg views ÷ 18,835 subscribers
Avg views / post
643
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 56 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
56 (2 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
16,069
Reactions total
194
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 02:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 30s
Average length
1m 08s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
427 reactions across 39 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
201
47.1%
👏
57
13.3%
🙏
52
12.2%
💯
46
10.8%
🔥
41
9.60%
👍
9
2.11%
🏆
7
1.64%
🕊
7
1.64%
custom 5435957248314579621
2
0.468%
custom 5440354006335495210
2
0.468%
🎉
2
0.468%
custom 5467597172872584200
1
0.234%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 427 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
5 НОВЫХ ЭКОГИДОВ УЖЕ В ПРЕДПРОДАЖЕ СО СКИДКОЙ НА САЙТЕ 🩷 УСПЕЙТЕ КУПИТЬ 🌿
✅ рекомендации на разный бюджет, доступные в РФ и за рубежом по миру
✅ самые безопасные, экологичные и эффективные рекомендации согласно актуальным международным исследованиям
✅ удобный формат в pdf-файле
✅ косметические средства удобно распределены блоками по активным действующим компонентам
Ссылка на сайт с экогидами 👉 https://celestebrand.…
СЕНТЯБРЬ 2026
6 Сентября уход за зонами выдающими раннее старение (шея, декольте, локти, руки)
17 Сентября мужской уход
Дорогие, в клубе биохакинга красоты уже выложены средства месяца, также анонсированы даты выхода тем месяца, также уже в продаже архив Августа, присоединяйтесь к Сентябрьскому клубу и приобретайте уникальные готовые уже сформированные в папки и файлы для использования онлайн и офлайн.
Ссылка на …
мамы и папы девочек подростков, ценнейший подарок для Вас, экогид по безопасной и эффективной декоративной косметике , мы не минуем соц. сети, тренды на косметику и быть с макияжем, а ругать бесполезно, накраситься в школе тем, что подруга принесла, после смоет в туалете мылом… лучше своя, но здоровая косметичка под Вашим контролем 🌿🌷 и с любовью, себе поменяли и дочкам здоровую декоративную косметику, экогид к 1 Сен…
Как обезопасить себя при выборе косметики и уходов, чтобы она была исключительно безопасной и эффективной, что делать если пострадали от косметики. Прямой эфир с Богданой, которая получила последствия при использовании косметики известного на рынке России бренда состоится сегодня, в 16.00 по МСК, тут 👉 открытый канал с прямыми, эфирами.
Приходите на эфир задать свои вопросы и услышать ценнейшую информацию, которая о…
Интересно различие между натурально, экологичной и безопасной и эффективной косметикой?! Почему эко и био это ни про безопасность и красоту с хорошим эффектом?
Да, очень интересно.81%
Уже знаю.23%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
ПОВЫШЕНИЕ ЦЕН НА ВСЕ ЭКОГИДЫ С 1 СЕНТЯБРЯ 🔔
Дорогие, успевайте купить экогиды по текущим ценам!
Также напоминаю, что через несколько часов на экогид «Акне, постакне» закончится спец.условия со скидкой по предпродаже
Ссылка на официальный сайт 👉 https://celestebrand.ru
Тех.поддержка по всем вопросам 👉 https://t.me/celestebrand
Администратор канала Данила.
В экогиде размещены контакты специалистов офлайн и онлайн по всему Миру, клиник, СПА, бань, центров здоровья, которые отобраны с учётом высочайшей экспертности специалистов, безопасности, эффективности, качества процедур и клиентского сервис.
Направления деятельности:
• стоматология и ортодонтия
• умный фитнес и функциональная коррекция тела, паттерна шага
• коррекция лица, челюсти, прикуса для подготовки к ортод…
1. Зубы мудрости, почему не нужно удалять, могла ли природа придумать что-то лишнее? Что делать, если удалили?
https://t.me/arsiceleste_official/2678
2. Есть ли в России и в Мире специалисты и клиники,где лечат кариес без умерщвления нервов, а значит и самого зуба, что опасно и приводит к его высокой токсичности для организма, вплоть до запрета рожать, пока такой зуб есть во рту
https://t.me/arsiceleste_official/2…
Брекеты — это самая огромная боль минимум уже 3 поколений⚠️ не приводящая к здоровью и красоте манипуляция, нет они не выравнивают прикус… нет, это не красиво и не здорОво.
Ретейнер ни в коем случай нельзя позволять ставить ❌ а если он уже стоит, надо снимать, да естественно зубы разъедутся, потому, что ретейнер не решает никаким образом здоровую и функциональную для самой челюсти и тела постановку зубов, ей занимаю…
Спасибо за голосование. Обязательно добавится научная информация в экогид для родителей (уходы для детей). Экогид планируется в продаже в Сентябре.
Возможно также, как с экогидами, которые анонсированы сегодня, будет предпродажа открыта на более выгодных условиях на сутки.
Администратор канала Данила.
Открыты продажи 3 новых экогидов 👏
Каждый экогид доступен в 2 тарифах: с обновлениями и без
28 и 29 августа в связи с открытием продаж дарим скидку:
- 1000 руб. на тариф без обновлений
- повышенную скидку 6000 руб. на тариф с обновлениями
Все средства и рекомендации, размещенные в экогидах, доступны на разный бюджет, как в РФ, так и в СНГ, по всему миру (указаны прямые ссылки на товары: сайты производителей в РФ и…
❤2🏆2🔥2🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @arsiceleste_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@arsiceleste_official edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
23 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Интересно различие между натурально, экологичной и безопасной и эффективной косметикой?! Почему эко и био это ни про безопасность и красоту с хорошим эффектом?
Да, очень интересно.81%
Уже знаю.23%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Уходы для тела (взрослые) кремы, гели для душа, мыло31%
Современные модные аппараты для домашнего использования25%
Витамины/минералы44%
The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Экогид с безопасными и эффективными уходами для какой кожи опубликовать на днях?
для нормальной кожи14%
для кожи с акне26%
для кожи с морщинами52%
для сухой/жирной кожи36%
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Арси Целесте | Официальный канал” (@arsiceleste_official), 18,835 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arsiceleste_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.